Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12009#discussion_r58168784
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -45,46 +45,135 @@ abstract class NativeDDLCommand(val sql: Strin
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-204275787
One very minor comment on imports, and think there are now merge conflicts
with latest master that need fixing, subject to those LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12106#discussion_r58168589
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -451,10 +451,10 @@ final class OnlineLDAOptimizer extends LDAOptimi
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12106#discussion_r58168561
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -451,10 +451,10 @@ final class OnlineLDAOptimizer extends LDAOptimi
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039#issuecomment-204275158
Merged and updated the JIRA to make it more specific. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9229
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9229#issuecomment-204274118
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks and sorry for the long delay in code
review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#discussion_r58168089
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/Predictor.scala ---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.mllib.regression.LabeledPoint
import org.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12088
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12078#issuecomment-204273968
I think current Spark code already do care about this race condition issue,
though not so elegant. From the description of JIRA, I think a more broad
problem is how t
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12088#issuecomment-204273771
Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11809#issuecomment-204269003
@sameeragarwal Thanks for reviewing. Waiting for @marmbrus checking this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11995#issuecomment-204268904
ping @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12099#discussion_r58166528
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveExplainSuite.scala
---
@@ -101,4 +101,19 @@ class HiveExplainSuite extends Quer
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12099#discussion_r58166375
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ frameBound
explainOption
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12105#issuecomment-204267311
**[Test build #2721 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2721/consoleFull)**
for PR 12105 at commit
[`6fd07db`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12099#discussion_r58165643
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -237,15 +237,18 @@ case class ExplainCommand(
logicalPl
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12099#discussion_r58165608
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ frameBound
explainOption
-
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12099#discussion_r58165593
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveExplainSuite.scala
---
@@ -101,4 +101,19 @@ class HiveExplainSuite extends QueryTest
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12099#discussion_r58165570
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/debug/package.scala ---
@@ -81,29 +100,11 @@ package object debug {
* WholeStageCodeg
Github user tejasapatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11891#issuecomment-204259326
ping @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-204257179
@kiszk Now I'm inspecting this patch and I noticed some defects so far.
1.
I ran a job like as follows.
```
sc.parallelize(1 to 1, 1).toDF.show
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11978#issuecomment-204255875
@rajeshbalamohan you need to clean `sc.hadoopRDD` too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11978#issuecomment-204255888
**[Test build #54687 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54687/consoleFull)**
for PR 11978 at commit
[`0c53ed2`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11978#issuecomment-204255624
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#issuecomment-204251175
**[Test build #54686 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54686/consoleFull)**
for PR 11517 at commit
[`ef588db`](https://gi
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12103#discussion_r58162424
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -232,6 +233,56 @@ public MapData getMap(int ordinal) {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#issuecomment-204248244
**[Test build #54685 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54685/consoleFull)**
for PR 10794 at commit
[`ebe3c7f`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#discussion_r58161386
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -61,6 +63,14 @@ public long durationMs() {
public abs
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12039#issuecomment-204241139
LGTM. Having some issues with the merge script. I will merge it later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12106#issuecomment-204240413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12106#issuecomment-204240409
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12106#issuecomment-204240344
**[Test build #54684 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54684/consoleFull)**
for PR 12106 at commit
[`38cf0f3`](https://g
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#discussion_r58160147
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -61,6 +63,14 @@ public long durationMs() {
public abs
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12048#discussion_r58160046
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/package.scala
---
@@ -28,37 +28,36 @@ package object state {
implicit c
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12048#discussion_r58160004
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/IncrementalExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apach
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12048#discussion_r58159893
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/utils.scala ---
@@ -261,4 +246,90 @@ object Utils {
finalAndCompleteAg
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#discussion_r58159707
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -61,6 +63,14 @@ public long durationMs() {
public abs
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12048#discussion_r58159654
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StreamTest.scala ---
@@ -224,11 +239,8 @@ trait StreamTest extends QueryTest with Timeouts {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#discussion_r58159480
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -61,6 +63,14 @@ public long durationMs() {
public abs
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#discussion_r58159371
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -61,6 +63,14 @@ public long durationMs() {
public abs
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#discussion_r58158879
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -61,6 +63,14 @@ public long durationMs() {
public abs
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12106#issuecomment-204229682
**[Test build #54684 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54684/consoleFull)**
for PR 12106 at commit
[`38cf0f3`](https://gi
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12106
[SPARK-14322] [MLlib] Use treeReduce instead of reduce in OnlineLDAOptimizer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
OnlineLDAOptimizer uses RDD.reduce in two places where it cou
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12102#issuecomment-204228061
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12105#issuecomment-204228144
Jenkins, OK to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12102#issuecomment-204228059
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12038
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#discussion_r58157898
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -61,6 +63,14 @@ public long durationMs() {
public abs
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#discussion_r58157878
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -61,6 +63,14 @@ public long durationMs() {
public abs
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12102#issuecomment-204227840
**[Test build #54683 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54683/consoleFull)**
for PR 12102 at commit
[`37724be`](https://g
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12038#issuecomment-204227663
Merging to master. Thanks, @liyezhang556520 !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12105#issuecomment-204227649
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user rajeshbalamohan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12105
SPARK-14321. [SQL] Reduce date format cost and string-to-date cost iâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Here is the generated code snippet when executing date f
Github user sethah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#issuecomment-204225070
@yongtang I believe only Spark committers can do that. Maybe @jkbradley
could help?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11517#discussion_r58157092
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -61,6 +63,14 @@ public long durationMs() {
public abs
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204221481
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204221480
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204221322
**[Test build #54682 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54682/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
[`a604078`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204219686
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204219684
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204219598
**[Test build #54681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54681/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
[`fde020f`](https://g
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#issuecomment-204217824
@yhuai OK. Please let me know if any changes are not clear to you. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#issuecomment-204208195
@viirya Thank you for working on it. I think the overall approach makes
sense. Looks like we can adjust how we organize SessionState, SessionCatalog,
and FunctionRegistry
Github user liyezhang556520 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12083#issuecomment-204207886
Hi @vanzin , the memory copy place is given out by @zsxwing , the call
stack is as follows:
```
at java.nio.Bits.copyFromArray(Bits.java:754)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-204204935
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-204204937
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user yongtang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#issuecomment-204204858
Hi @sethah by the way, could you help start a Jenkins test if possible?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-204204607
**[Test build #54679 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54679/consoleFull)**
for PR 11681 at commit
[`3e3356c`](https://g
Github user yongtang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#issuecomment-204204359
Hi @sethah thanks for the review. There are some issues with the regex but
managed to get it done. The test also has been moved to ML. Let me know if
there are any ot
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12102#issuecomment-204204056
**[Test build #54683 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54683/consoleFull)**
for PR 12102 at commit
[`37724be`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#issuecomment-204204179
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#issuecomment-204204182
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036#issuecomment-204203643
**[Test build #54680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54680/consoleFull)**
for PR 12036 at commit
[`05709f0`](https://g
Github user rajeshbalamohan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11978#issuecomment-204200260
Thanks @andrewor14 . Addressed your review comments in latest commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-204199961
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-204199960
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user liyezhang556520 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12038#issuecomment-204199865
@zsxwing , I updated the commit description. Thank you @zsxwing and @vanzin
for reviewing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-204199841
**[Test build #54675 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54675/consoleFull)**
for PR 11570 at commit
[`de594b6`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12047#issuecomment-204197995
**[Test build #2720 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2720/consoleFull)**
for PR 12047 at commit
[`872ecf5`](https://
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12101#issuecomment-204197800
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12101#issuecomment-204197799
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12101#issuecomment-204197711
**[Test build #54672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54672/consoleFull)**
for PR 12101 at commit
[`8cd2a24`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12104#issuecomment-204197089
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user bomeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12104
[SPARK-14323] [SQL] fix the show functions by using catalog listFunctions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The syntax of "SHOW FUNCTIONS" can be found here:
[https://
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12086#issuecomment-204194142
Thanks @bomeng, I will post the PR shortly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9229#issuecomment-204193466
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204193556
**[Test build #54682 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54682/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
[`a604078`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9229#issuecomment-204193464
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12099#issuecomment-204193533
Hi, @rxin .
Could you review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12103#issuecomment-204193375
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12103#issuecomment-204193378
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9229#issuecomment-204193319
**[Test build #54671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54671/consoleFull)**
for PR 9229 at commit
[`94dcec0`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12103#issuecomment-204193208
**[Test build #54676 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54676/consoleFull)**
for PR 12103 at commit
[`a1fe9f8`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204192959
**[Test build #54681 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54681/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
[`fde020f`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204192677
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204192674
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-204192578
**[Test build #54678 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54678/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
[`61920a9`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12099#issuecomment-204191621
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
1 - 100 of 787 matches
Mail list logo
