Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12131
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12131#issuecomment-205918635
LGTM, thanks for improving the comments. Its much clearer to me what is
happing now!]
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12170
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pravingadakh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12176#issuecomment-205918384
I could document the returned values, but frankly I have no idea what those
values are. I can see the documentation of first returned value `gammad` in the
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12170#issuecomment-205917914
LGTM. Merging to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11419#issuecomment-205916377
Haha OK thanks. I just sent a PR to update this PR:
[https://github.com/zhengruifeng/spark/pull/1]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#discussion_r58582999
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12084
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12166#issuecomment-205914706
**[Test build #55001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55001/consoleFull)**
for PR 12166 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12083#issuecomment-205914342
@liyezhang556520 I like the idea of eargerly copying into a direct buffer,
but understand that might be a lot of code for not much gain. I still think we
should reduce
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12084#issuecomment-205914146
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12166#discussion_r58582117
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -619,6 +651,31 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private[ml] (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12166#discussion_r58582132
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -758,6 +816,10 @@ class LDA @Since("1.6.0") (
@Since("1.6.0")
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12166#issuecomment-205913961
Updated!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12166#discussion_r58582125
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -258,7 +265,30 @@ private[clustering] trait LDAParams extends Params
with
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12175#issuecomment-205913234
Thank you, @srowen !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12175#issuecomment-205910764
I think that's pretty reasonable as a minimally invasive fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12049#issuecomment-205910352
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12049#issuecomment-205910356
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12049#issuecomment-205909806
**[Test build #54994 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54994/consoleFull)**
for PR 12049 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12175#issuecomment-205902962
Hi, @srowen . I minimized the change on master.
* Undo the changes on `common` module.
* Implement `initCap` by the following changes.
```
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#discussion_r58577527
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12175#issuecomment-205902930
**[Test build #55000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55000/consoleFull)**
for PR 12175 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12178#issuecomment-205900906
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12121#issuecomment-205901169
I think this PR also resolves another JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14128 Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12178#issuecomment-205900843
**[Test build #54997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54997/consoleFull)**
for PR 12178 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12178#issuecomment-205900916
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#discussion_r58576642
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-205897396
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-205897404
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-205893057
cc @andrewor14 @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12136#issuecomment-205896645
**[Test build #54999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54999/consoleFull)**
for PR 12136 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12153#issuecomment-205896642
**[Test build #54998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54998/consoleFull)**
for PR 12153 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12116#issuecomment-205896732
@holdenk Thanks for your comments! I will make changes accordingly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12178#issuecomment-205896647
**[Test build #54997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54997/consoleFull)**
for PR 12178 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-205896549
**[Test build #54993 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54993/consoleFull)**
for PR 12138 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#discussion_r58575785
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12178
[SPARK-14407][SQL] Hides HadoopFsRelation related data source API into
execution package
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR moves `HadoopFsRelation` related
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#discussion_r58575623
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#issuecomment-205893715
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-205893818
**[Test build #54996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54996/consoleFull)**
for PR 12081 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#issuecomment-205893720
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-205893108
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#issuecomment-205893381
**[Test build #54995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54995/consoleFull)**
for PR 11989 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-205892839
Thanks for the review! @hvanhovell
Also cc @yhuai @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12157#discussion_r58572140
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/HadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -53,14 +53,22 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{NextIterator,
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12176#issuecomment-205882669
A-ha, understood about `.values`. This looks pretty reasonable. My only
question is, does it make sense conceptually that this method also returns a
list of IDs? it
Github user ajbozarth commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12123#issuecomment-205882481
I'll add it the history server later today then, I didn't re-test on the
history server after the change so I didn't notice.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#discussion_r58569079
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManagerSuite.scala ---
@@ -789,6 +791,51 @@ class TaskSetManagerSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205881415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205881421
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205880601
**[Test build #54990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54990/consoleFull)**
for PR 12087 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12153#issuecomment-205878760
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#issuecomment-205878822
**[Test build #54995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54995/consoleFull)**
for PR 11989 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12117#issuecomment-205878605
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12153#issuecomment-205878765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12117#issuecomment-205878599
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12153#issuecomment-205878364
**[Test build #54988 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54988/consoleFull)**
for PR 12153 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12117#issuecomment-205878276
**[Test build #54987 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54987/consoleFull)**
for PR 12117 at commit
Github user yongtang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#issuecomment-205877757
@sethah Thanks. The import has been removed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12049#issuecomment-205871057
**[Test build #54994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54994/consoleFull)**
for PR 12049 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12049#issuecomment-205869083
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12128#issuecomment-205868721
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12128#issuecomment-205868723
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12128#issuecomment-205868179
**[Test build #54986 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54986/consoleFull)**
for PR 12128 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#issuecomment-205866052
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#issuecomment-205866050
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#discussion_r58563479
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManagerSuite.scala ---
@@ -789,6 +791,51 @@ class TaskSetManagerSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#issuecomment-205865589
**[Test build #54985 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54985/consoleFull)**
for PR 12146 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#issuecomment-205861283
@yhuai Sure, will do it in this PR. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sethah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#issuecomment-205857272
This LGTM other than one small comment about imports. @MLnick could you
make a final pass?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205858120
It looks like Hive might actually need Joda time:
```
- analyze MetastoreRelations *** FAILED ***
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#discussion_r58558671
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForestSuite.scala ---
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-205855786
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-205855791
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-205855383
**[Test build #54983 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54983/consoleFull)**
for PR 12169 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-205853906
**[Test build #54993 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54993/consoleFull)**
for PR 12138 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-205851532
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205850589
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205850592
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205850563
**[Test build #54992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54992/consoleFull)**
for PR 12087 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205848733
benchmark added, the result is included in the benchmark code. I also ran
this benchmark against master branch, the result is:
```
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-205848612
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-205848622
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-205848558
**[Test build #54991 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54991/consoleFull)**
for PR 12138 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205847599
**[Test build #54992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54992/consoleFull)**
for PR 12087 at commit
Github user pravingadakh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12176#discussion_r58553918
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -542,10 +539,11 @@ private[clustering] object
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#discussion_r58553204
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1659,11 +1665,12 @@ object TimeWindowing extends
Github user pravingadakh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12176#discussion_r58553056
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -440,12 +440,9 @@ final class OnlineLDAOptimizer extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-205845316
**[Test build #54991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54991/consoleFull)**
for PR 12138 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11549#issuecomment-205844978
@jkbradley @hhbyyh I can work on this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12123#issuecomment-205844392
Yeah, we can see the user name in the history page and it's gotten using
the REST API.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12089#issuecomment-205843565
@jkbradley Agree, I will update the PR soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12153#issuecomment-205834944
**[Test build #54988 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54988/consoleFull)**
for PR 12153 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12177#issuecomment-205837805
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mchalek commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000#issuecomment-205840895
Bump. Would be nice to get closure on this. I doubt that we were in the
minority in being affected by this (although admittedly, complaints of other
failures seem
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205840164
**[Test build #54990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54990/consoleFull)**
for PR 12087 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#issuecomment-205839654
@gatorsmile Thank you for working on it. I feel changes of DropTable
command should also make this command natively supported by Spark (no
runSqlHive)? If so, we can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205839287
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205839240
**[Test build #54989 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54989/consoleFull)**
for PR 12087 at commit
601 - 700 of 916 matches
Mail list logo
