Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10664#issuecomment-206720875
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10664#issuecomment-206720880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206720343
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206720335
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10664#issuecomment-206720307
**[Test build #55193 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55193/consoleFull)**
for PR 10664 at commit
[`21f8be5`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206720173
**[Test build #55195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55195/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`7a046fa`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12234#issuecomment-206717851
**[Test build #55196 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55196/consoleFull)**
for PR 12234 at commit
[`eebd2ef`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12234#issuecomment-206717855
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12234#issuecomment-206717854
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12234#issuecomment-206717682
**[Test build #55196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55196/consoleFull)**
for PR 12234 at commit
[`eebd2ef`](https://gi
GitHub user sameeragarwal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12234
[SPARK-14454] Better exception handling while marking tasks as failed
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds support for better handling of exceptions ins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12233#issuecomment-206713199
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12233#issuecomment-206713200
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12233#issuecomment-206713072
**[Test build #55190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55190/consoleFull)**
for PR 12233 at commit
[`8548139`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206711801
**[Test build #2766 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2766/consoleFull)**
for PR 12231 at commit
[`3761737`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206711530
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206711532
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206711525
**[Test build #55194 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55194/consoleFull)**
for PR 12231 at commit
[`3761737`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206711363
**[Test build #55194 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55194/consoleFull)**
for PR 12231 at commit
[`3761737`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206711287
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206711386
**[Test build #55195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55195/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`7a046fa`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12229#issuecomment-206710667
**[Test build #55192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55192/consoleFull)**
for PR 12229 at commit
[`c5de86b`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10664#issuecomment-206710668
**[Test build #55193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55193/consoleFull)**
for PR 10664 at commit
[`21f8be5`](https://gi
Github user yanboliang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9626
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12233#issuecomment-206709148
**[Test build #55190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55190/consoleFull)**
for PR 12233 at commit
[`8548139`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206709150
**[Test build #55191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55191/consoleFull)**
for PR 12231 at commit
[`609e8eb`](https://gi
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12233
[SPARK-13687][PYTHON] Cleanup PySpark parallelize temporary files
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Eagerly cleanup PySpark's temporary parallelize cleanup files rather th
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206708283
Ok. Finally solve weird runtime mirror problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206708042
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206708043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206708039
**[Test build #55189 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55189/consoleFull)**
for PR 12231 at commit
[`54d75a3`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206707861
**[Test build #55189 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55189/consoleFull)**
for PR 12231 at commit
[`54d75a3`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206707371
I don't know -- it's possible but I don't know how often you'd see that ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12232#issuecomment-206707212
**[Test build #55188 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55188/consoleFull)**
for PR 12232 at commit
[`b260790`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12232#issuecomment-206707168
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12232
[SPARK-14452][SQL] Provide ways to specify encoders in Scala without â¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The Scala Dataset public API currently only allows users to specify
enc
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206707062
Is it possible that users want to use one `Aggregator` in different context
with different encoders?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206706739
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206706738
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12230#issuecomment-206706664
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12230#issuecomment-206706667
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206706611
**[Test build #55180 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55180/consoleFull)**
for PR 12161 at commit
[`ff6ebbe`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206706600
**[Test build #55185 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55185/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`7a046fa`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206706622
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206706621
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12230#issuecomment-206706601
**[Test build #55184 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55184/consoleFull)**
for PR 12230 at commit
[`b93c81e`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12229#issuecomment-206706255
**[Test build #55182 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55182/consoleFull)**
for PR 12229 at commit
[`8719c26`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12229#issuecomment-206706338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12229#issuecomment-206706340
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206706205
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206706189
**[Test build #55186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55186/consoleFull)**
for PR 12231 at commit
[`c0379a2`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206706203
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206706059
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206706060
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12061#issuecomment-206706012
**[Test build #55187 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55187/consoleFull)**
for PR 12061 at commit
[`7f1e770`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206705916
**[Test build #55179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55179/consoleFull)**
for PR 12161 at commit
[`cae66fd`](https://g
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-206705518
I think with the changes so far, it might be good to change to a regular PR
from WIP/RFC - any other things people think I should address before that?
---
If your proj
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206705275
**[Test build #55186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55186/consoleFull)**
for PR 12231 at commit
[`c0379a2`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12061#issuecomment-206705299
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231#issuecomment-206705210
cc @marmbrus @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12231
[SPARK-14451][SQL] Move encoder definition into Aggregator interface
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we first introduced Aggregators, we required the user of Aggregators
t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206703334
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206703332
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206703298
**[Test build #55183 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55183/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`60f4ca0`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206701004
**[Test build #55185 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55185/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`7a046fa`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12185#issuecomment-206700636
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12185#issuecomment-206700637
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12230#issuecomment-206699852
**[Test build #55184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55184/consoleFull)**
for PR 12230 at commit
[`b93c81e`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12185#issuecomment-206700094
**[Test build #55176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55176/consoleFull)**
for PR 12185 at commit
[`171389e`](https://g
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12230
[SPARK-13783] [ML] Model export/import for spark.ml: GBTs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added save/load for
GBTClassifier/GBTClassificationModel/GBTRegressor/GBTRegress
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206696333
**[Test build #55183 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55183/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`60f4ca0`](https://gith
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-206696183
Looks like the runtime mirror can't work well with using member method as
udf.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12229#issuecomment-206695925
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-206693926
Close this PR due to it's merged in #12214
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user chenghao-intel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12229#issuecomment-206693877
**[Test build #55182 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55182/consoleFull)**
for PR 12229 at commit
[`8719c26`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12124#issuecomment-206692927
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12229#issuecomment-206692982
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12124#issuecomment-206692961
@jkbradley Ready for reviewing. I'll try to fix trees if there still time
before 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12124#issuecomment-206692925
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12229
[SPARK-10063][SQL] Remove DirectParquetOutputCommitter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch removes DirectParquetOutputCommitter. This was initially created
by Databricks
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12124#issuecomment-206692753
**[Test build #55181 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55181/consoleFull)**
for PR 12124 at commit
[`fd4fc11`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12124#issuecomment-206691767
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12124#issuecomment-206691766
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12124#issuecomment-206691664
**[Test build #55178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55178/consoleFull)**
for PR 12124 at commit
[`cf4df64`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12124#issuecomment-206691541
**[Test build #55181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55181/consoleFull)**
for PR 12124 at commit
[`fd4fc11`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206691544
**[Test build #55180 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55180/consoleFull)**
for PR 12161 at commit
[`ff6ebbe`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206691029
**[Test build #55179 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55179/consoleFull)**
for PR 12161 at commit
[`cae66fd`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12124#issuecomment-206690378
**[Test build #55178 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55178/consoleFull)**
for PR 12124 at commit
[`cf4df64`](https://gi
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12204#issuecomment-206689374
+@rdblue
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12061#issuecomment-206688937
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12061#issuecomment-206688939
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12061#issuecomment-206688923
**[Test build #55177 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55177/consoleFull)**
for PR 12061 at commit
[`7f1e770`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12061#issuecomment-206686578
**[Test build #55177 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55177/consoleFull)**
for PR 12061 at commit
[`7f1e770`](https://gi
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11218#issuecomment-206686765
@MLnick We might be able to provide a standard implementation, but we would
need to use Catalyst's ScalaReflection methods since ```inputType``` is a
Catalyst DataTyp
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12061#issuecomment-206686319
cc @marmbrus , do you have time to take a look? thx!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12185#issuecomment-206684540
**[Test build #55176 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55176/consoleFull)**
for PR 12185 at commit
[`171389e`](https://gi
Github user ueshin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11487#issuecomment-206683823
@squito Thank you for your report.
I executed the test on 2.10 many times while preparing this PR, but I have
not found the failures.
The first one seems the same
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12226#issuecomment-206683776
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12226#issuecomment-206683779
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
1 - 100 of 776 matches
Mail list logo
