Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13500
Can you explain more what's going on in this pr description?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
Can you put some data about performance improvements on the pr description?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
Looks like there are some failures ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59968/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59965/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401
**[Test build #59968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59968/consoleFull)**
for PR 13401 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419
@tejasapatil if the nodes where the data was cached go down, the
CacheManager should still consider that data as cached. In that case, the next
time the data is accessed, the underlying RDD
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
**[Test build #59965 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59965/consoleFull)**
for PR 13065 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13501#discussion_r65791157
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala
---
@@ -338,12 +339,20 @@ case class WholeStageCodegenExec(child:
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
Ran some kerberos tests here and all looks good, so I'm merging this (will
also try 1.6.x if there are no conflicts). Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13318
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13501
cc @rxin @marmbrus @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
**[Test build #59974 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59974/consoleFull)**
for PR 13504 at commit
Github user GayathriMurali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176#discussion_r65790125
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1092,14 +1095,11 @@ for more details on the API.
## QuantileDiscretizer
`QuantileDiscretizer`
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13503
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13497
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59960/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13497
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13472
**[Test build #59973 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59973/consoleFull)**
for PR 13472 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13497
**[Test build #59960 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59960/consoleFull)**
for PR 13497 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3063/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3061 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3061/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3062 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3062/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
**[Test build #59972 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59972/consoleFull)**
for PR 13061 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3060 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3060/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3059 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3059/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176#discussion_r65788351
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1092,14 +1095,11 @@ for more details on the API.
## QuantileDiscretizer
`QuantileDiscretizer` takes a
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
The test failures all seem unrelated, but, just in case: retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
**[Test build #59971 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59971/consoleFull)**
for PR 13504 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
**[Test build #59963 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59963/consoleFull)**
for PR 13061 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59963/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
[SPARK-15762][SQL] Cache Metadata.hashCode and use a singleton for
Metadata.empty
We should cache `Metadata.hashCode` and use a singleton for
`Metadata.empty` because calculating metadata
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3064 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3064/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943
Merged to master/branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59967/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #59967 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59967/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13502
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59969/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13502
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13502
**[Test build #59969 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59969/consoleFull)**
for PR 13502 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#discussion_r65786593
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -667,6 +700,90 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#discussion_r65786474
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -278,6 +303,9 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59966/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#discussion_r65786382
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -114,28 +123,45 @@ class HistoryServer(
* this UI with the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
**[Test build #59966 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59966/consoleFull)**
for PR 12889 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13503
**[Test build #59970 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59970/consoleFull)**
for PR 13503 at commit
GitHub user MechCoder opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13503
[SPARK-15761] [MLlib] [PySpark] Load ipython when default python is Python3
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I would like to use IPython with Python 3.5. It is
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9162#discussion_r65785335
--- Diff:
external/docker-integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/DB2IntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -47,19 +49,20 @@ class
Github user lresende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9162
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13502
**[Test build #59969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59969/consoleFull)**
for PR 13502 at commit
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13502
[SPARK-15760][docs] Add documentation for package-related configs.
While there, also document spark.files and spark.jars. Text is the
same as the spark-submit help text with some minor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13472
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13472
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59957/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13472
**[Test build #59957 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59957/consoleFull)**
for PR 13472 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13114
@GuoNing89 please close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
Hmm, weird; let me investigate what's going on with these tests...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12152
Can we close this PR since it's been superseded by #13061?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59942/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3064 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3064/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3061 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3061/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3063 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3063/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3062 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3062/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
**[Test build #59942 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59942/consoleFull)**
for PR 13491 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #59967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59967/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401
**[Test build #59968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59968/consoleFull)**
for PR 13401 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3060 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3060/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3059 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3059/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
**[Test build #59966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59966/consoleFull)**
for PR 12889 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
**[Test build #59965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59965/consoleFull)**
for PR 13065 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59964/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176
**[Test build #59964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59964/consoleFull)**
for PR 13176 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
I'll circle back up with everyone after 2.0 is released.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#discussion_r65780016
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -183,7 +191,7 @@ def getThresholds(self):
If :py:attr:`thresholds` is set, return its
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13490
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13490
m2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#discussion_r65779711
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -183,7 +191,7 @@ def getThresholds(self):
If :py:attr:`thresholds` is set, return its value.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59961/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943
**[Test build #59961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59961/consoleFull)**
for PR 12943 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13490
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13490
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59954/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13490
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#discussion_r65778807
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
---
@@ -284,8 +284,128 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13490
**[Test build #59954 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59954/consoleFull)**
for PR 13490 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13469
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13474
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13422
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13469
Merging to master and branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#discussion_r65778263
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -183,7 +191,7 @@ def getThresholds(self):
If :py:attr:`thresholds` is set, return its value.
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13422
LGTM; merging to master / 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13474
Merging to master and branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13176
**[Test build #59964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59964/consoleFull)**
for PR 13176 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
**[Test build #59963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59963/consoleFull)**
for PR 13061 at commit
101 - 200 of 568 matches
Mail list logo
