Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13531#discussion_r66538048
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategySuite.scala
---
@@ -340,6 +340,40 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10412
**[Test build #60250 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60250/consoleFull)**
for PR 10412 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
Is this a bug fix or performance fix? Sorry I don't really understand after
reading your description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60245/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66537635
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ForeachWriter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
**[Test build #60245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60245/consoleFull)**
for PR 13581 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66537560
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ForeachWriter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13582
**[Test build #60249 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60249/consoleFull)**
for PR 13582 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66537102
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -401,6 +381,53 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
DataFrame)
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13577
Actually thanks for the pr. Got me to do this one:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13582
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13582
[SPARK-15850][SQL] Remove function grouping in SparkSession
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkSession does not have that many functions due to better namespacing,
and as a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60246/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
**[Test build #60246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60246/consoleFull)**
for PR 13371 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13393
Hi @yanboliang , could you maybe take a quick look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13572
Are we breaking past behavior here? I would say we shouldn't change this,
since this is a weird command anyway. I'm actually surprised we have this
command.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66534481
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ForeachWriter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60244/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #60244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60244/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66533974
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -401,6 +381,53 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
DataFrame)
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66533645
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -401,6 +381,53 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
DataFrame)
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13531#discussion_r66533473
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -298,6 +309,28 @@ trait FileFormat {
}
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66533244
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -401,6 +381,53 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
DataFrame)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746
**[Test build #60248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60248/consoleFull)**
for PR 11746 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66532833
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ForeachWriter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66532767
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ForeachWriter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10412#discussion_r66532615
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -399,40 +402,61 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
*/
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66532405
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -401,6 +381,53 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
DataFrame)
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10412#discussion_r66532257
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -399,40 +402,61 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
*/
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10412#discussion_r66532121
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -399,40 +402,61 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
*/
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342#discussion_r66532056
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -401,6 +381,53 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
DataFrame)
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10412
Sure, I will do it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13577#discussion_r66529939
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -346,15 +346,68 @@ class SQLContext private[sql](val sparkSession:
SparkSession)
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
@marmbrus could you take a look once again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
LGTM, pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
> in the PR description
@hvanhovell not PR title...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
**[Test build #60247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60247/consoleFull)**
for PR 13581 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581#discussion_r66527669
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -434,24 +436,21 @@ abstract class
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
Tip: if you put "closes #13522" in the PR description then the subsumed PR
will be automatically closed once this PR is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
LGTM except a minor comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581#discussion_r66525197
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -549,21 +552,22 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581#discussion_r66525010
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -434,24 +436,21 @@ abstract class
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786
@steveloughran
> I suspect that if you get told you are being pre-empted, you aren't
likely to get containers elsewhere
That's very possible. But I'm just trying to point out that
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
**[Test build #60246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60246/consoleFull)**
for PR 13371 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
**[Test build #60245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60245/consoleFull)**
for PR 13581 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
[SPARK-14321][SQL] Reduce date format cost and string-to-date cost in date
functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current implementations of `UnixTime` and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
ping @yhuai @rxin @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13580
I don't have the strong feelings, but I still believe both cases hurt
performance in different ways and in rare cases, and if that's to happen I
prefer the version that yells less at the user. In
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #60244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60244/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60243/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
**[Test build #60243 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60243/consoleFull)**
for PR 13549 at commit
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r66509510
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r66509444
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r66509405
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object
Github user frreiss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155
@rxin I'll have an updated set of changes in tonight
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13573
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13580
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13580
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60241/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13573
I am going to trigger a snapshot build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13580
**[Test build #60241 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60241/consoleFull)**
for PR 13580 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13573
Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13573
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
**[Test build #60243 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60243/consoleFull)**
for PR 13549 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13543#discussion_r66501686
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/MasterArguments.scala ---
@@ -20,18 +20,24 @@ package org.apache.spark.deploy.master
import
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13436
Hi, @rxin .
Could you review this PR and give some opinion when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
**[Test build #60242 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60242/consoleFull)**
for PR 13549 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60242/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13579
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60238/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13569
Yeah I'm looking into how to reproduce this in a unit test. It seems we
have to go through `DeserializeToObjectExec` to reproduce the npe:
```
Execution 'q9-v1.4' failed: Job aborted due
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13579
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13579
**[Test build #60238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60238/consoleFull)**
for PR 13579 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13573
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13573
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60239/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13573
**[Test build #60239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60239/consoleFull)**
for PR 13573 at commit
Github user bomeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13543#discussion_r66493098
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/MasterArguments.scala ---
@@ -20,18 +20,24 @@ package org.apache.spark.deploy.master
import
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13569
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13400
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13400
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60240/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13400
**[Test build #60240 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60240/consoleFull)**
for PR 13400 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13564
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549#discussion_r66491058
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationChecker.scala
---
@@ -43,6 +43,41 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
**[Test build #60242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60242/consoleFull)**
for PR 13549 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13564
This is now sync'd to Maven Central and has passed tests, so I'm going to
merge it into master, branch-2.0, and branch-1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13543#discussion_r66490508
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/MasterArguments.scala ---
@@ -20,18 +20,24 @@ package org.apache.spark.deploy.master
import
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13481
Can this be merged @MLnick ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user bomeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13543#discussion_r66488409
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/MasterArguments.scala ---
@@ -20,18 +20,24 @@ package org.apache.spark.deploy.master
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13580
**[Test build #60241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60241/consoleFull)**
for PR 13580 at commit
GitHub user kayousterhout opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13580
Revert "[SPARK-14485][CORE] ignore task finished for executor lost anâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13572
LGTM
@liancheng anything to add?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13477
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13540
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13400
**[Test build #60240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60240/consoleFull)**
for PR 13400 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13555
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13531#discussion_r66478617
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -298,6 +309,28 @@ trait FileFormat {
}
201 - 300 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
