Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13644
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user markgrover commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953
Yeah, I agree with @koeninger. This PR is pretty out of date, it makes
sense to turn focus on Cody's PR #11863
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13651#discussion_r66880282
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13638#discussion_r66880127
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -155,8 +156,9 @@ private[sql] class CacheManager extends Logging {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13651#discussion_r66879827
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ case class Multiply(left:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13651#discussion_r66879738
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2847,4 +2847,15 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13651
**[Test build #60439 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60439/consoleFull)**
for PR 13651 at commit
GitHub user clockfly opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13651
[SPARK-15776][SQL] Divide Expression inside Aggregation function is casted
to wrong type
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the problem that Divide
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60427/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13338
**[Test build #60427 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60427/consoleFull)**
for PR 13338 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13592#discussion_r66878387
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1650,14 +1646,15 @@ SELECT * FROM jsonTable
## Hive Tables
Spark SQL also supports reading
Github user MechCoder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7963
Bump?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13592#discussion_r66877689
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -604,49 +607,47 @@ JavaRDD people =
sc.textFile("examples/src/main/resources/people.txt").m
});
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13592#discussion_r66877316
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -587,7 +590,7 @@ for the JavaBean.
{% highlight java %}
// sc is an existing
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13592#discussion_r66877088
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -517,24 +517,26 @@ types such as Sequences or Arrays. This RDD can be
implicitly converted to a Dat
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938
What keeps causing this failure? Is it the change in conf.py?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13649
**[Test build #60438 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60438/consoleFull)**
for PR 13649 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3095 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3095/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3093 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3093/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3094 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3094/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13611
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3092 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3092/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3091 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3091/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13649
Wow, weird test failure:
```
Running Spark unit tests
[info] Running Spark tests using SBT with these
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13649
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3090 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3090/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3089 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3089/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #60437 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60437/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13611
**[Test build #60422 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60422/consoleFull)**
for PR 13611 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13611
Thanks. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13638
Seems reasonable. Is this a regression from 1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13638#discussion_r66876008
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -155,8 +156,9 @@ private[sql] class CacheManager extends Logging
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13649
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60434/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13649
**[Test build #60434 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60434/consoleFull)**
for PR 13649 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13649
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13611
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563#discussion_r66875458
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -734,12 +737,14 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
printPipeContext: (String
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13611
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60422/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13592#discussion_r66875336
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -171,9 +171,9 @@ df.show()
{% highlight r %}
-sqlContext <- SQLContext(sc)
+spark
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13592#discussion_r66875208
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -145,10 +145,10 @@ df.show()
{% highlight java %}
-JavaSparkContext sc = ...; // An
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13648
Please create a JIRA ticket.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60421/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13592#discussion_r66874954
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -12,130 +12,130 @@ title: Spark SQL and DataFrames
Spark SQL is a Spark module for structured data
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413
**[Test build #60421 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60421/consoleFull)**
for PR 13413 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650
**[Test build #60436 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60436/consoleFull)**
for PR 13650 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650
cc: @yanboliang @MLnick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13592#discussion_r66873712
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -12,130 +12,130 @@ title: Spark SQL and DataFrames
Spark SQL is a Spark module for structured data
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563#discussion_r66873430
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -734,12 +737,14 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
printPipeContext:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650
**[Test build #60435 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60435/consoleFull)**
for PR 13650 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13482
Ok, I'm fine with this as a work around for now since you don't really know
and this will ensure it, but please clean up the code so that its clear which
sleep is which and add a nice comment
GitHub user MechCoder opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650
[SPARK-9623] [ML] Provide variance for RandomForestRegressor predictions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is useful to get the variance of predictions from the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13592#discussion_r66872913
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -12,130 +12,130 @@ title: Spark SQL and DataFrames
Spark SQL is a Spark module for structured data
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13649
/cc @liancheng for review (since you reviewed the original tests in #11775).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13649
**[Test build #60434 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60434/consoleFull)**
for PR 13649 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13623
@rxin Thanks. Consolidated all the underscore- and dot-files filtering
logic.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13649
[SPARK-15929] Fix portability of DataFrameSuite path globbing tests
The DataFrameSuite regression tests for SPARK-13774 fail in my environment
because they attempt to glob over all of `/mnt` and
Github user njwhite commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12951
@squito is this OK?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
Ohh good point that makes sense re: lost executors. Given that, I agree
that this approach seems like the right one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r66870624
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -280,10 +280,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13637
**[Test build #60433 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60433/consoleFull)**
for PR 13637 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13648
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13593
hi @gatorsmile , do you wanna update it? now both `tryUncacheQuery` and
`uncacheQuery` won't unregister accumulator
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13636
For reference, I was using
```
R version 3.3.0 (2016-05-03) -- "Supposedly Educational"
Copyright (C) 2016 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Platform:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13646
**[Test build #60432 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60432/consoleFull)**
for PR 13646 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13648
**[Test build #60431 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60431/consoleFull)**
for PR 13648 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13645
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60416/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13645
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13648
cc @hvanhovell @liancheng @clockfly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13648
[SQL][DOC][minor] document the contract of encoder serializer expressions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In our encoder framework, we imply that serializer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13645
**[Test build #60416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60416/consoleFull)**
for PR 13645 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13636
I'm still seeing errors after this change in my environment:
```
Failed
-
1. Failure: Check masked
Github user clockfly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13524
@Sephiroth-Lin
I think you can use a simpler case in the description of this PR.
Such as:
```
select sum(4/3)
```
The expected result is:
```
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13623
**[Test build #60430 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60430/consoleFull)**
for PR 13623 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13539
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13539
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60412/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13645
**[Test build #3081 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3081/consoleFull)**
for PR 13645 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13539
**[Test build #60412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60412/consoleFull)**
for PR 13539 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13646
**[Test build #60419 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60419/consoleFull)**
for PR 13646 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13646
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13646
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60419/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13646
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13140
**[Test build #60429 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60429/consoleFull)**
for PR 13140 at commit
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13482
@tgravescs, removing `notifyAll` doesn't solve the problem entirely, it
just removes one path that's causing the `allocate` call to be run too many
times. (Also, I haven't tested delaying loss
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13613
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13444
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13613
Thanks. Merging to master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13644
**[Test build #60428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60428/consoleFull)**
for PR 13644 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
@tdas @zsxwing , what is your comment about this PR? Thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jerryshao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13221
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13221
I'm going to close until I have a thorough fix about this issue, thanks a
lot for your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13444
Thanks! Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13613
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60413/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13613
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13137
@maropu Just had an offline discussion with @yhuai. So this case is a
little bit different from #13444. In #13444, the number of leaf files is
unknown before issuing the job, and each task may
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13613
**[Test build #60413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60413/consoleFull)**
for PR 13613 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13338#discussion_r66862738
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2309,21 +2310,24 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13338
**[Test build #60427 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60427/consoleFull)**
for PR 13338 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13137#discussion_r66862256
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -795,11 +795,15 @@ private[sql] object
301 - 400 of 708 matches
Mail list logo
