Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60567/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
**[Test build #60567 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60567/consoleFull)**
for PR 13684 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13683
@rxin would you mind taking a look? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
**[Test build #60567 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60567/consoleFull)**
for PR 13684 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13683
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13683
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60564/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13683
**[Test build #60564 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60564/consoleFull)**
for PR 13683 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13661
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60563/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13661
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13661
**[Test build #60563 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60563/consoleFull)**
for PR 13661 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #60566 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60566/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60566/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60565/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
**[Test build #60565 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60565/consoleFull)**
for PR 13684 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
**[Test build #60565 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60565/consoleFull)**
for PR 13684 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #60566 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60566/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
[SPARK-15908][R] Add varargs-type dropDuplicates() function in SparkR
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds varargs-type `dropDuplicates` function to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13683
**[Test build #60564 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60564/consoleFull)**
for PR 13683 at commit
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13683
[SPARK-15518][Core][Follow-up] Rename LocalSchedulerBackendEndpoint ->
LocalSchedulerBackend
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch is a follow-up to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13661
**[Test build #60563 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60563/consoleFull)**
for PR 13661 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13682
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13682
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60562/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13682
**[Test build #60562 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60562/consoleFull)**
for PR 13682 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60558/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
**[Test build #60558 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60558/consoleFull)**
for PR 13679 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13681
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60559/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13681
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13681
**[Test build #60559 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60559/consoleFull)**
for PR 13681 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60557/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
**[Test build #60557 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60557/consoleFull)**
for PR 11863 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13636
This passes for me, too. Thank you, @felixcheung .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30
**[Test build #8 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/8/consoleFull)**
for PR 30 at commit
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30
**[Test build #8 has
finished](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/8/consoleFull)**
for PR 30 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13673
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13673
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60555/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13673
**[Test build #60555 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60555/consoleFull)**
for PR 13673 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13678
**[Test build #60552 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60552/consoleFull)**
for PR 13678 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13661
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13661
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60554/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13681
lgtm pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13661
**[Test build #60554 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60554/consoleFull)**
for PR 13661 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13678
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60552/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13678
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
Have a very general question. Based on my understanding, we should
introduce our own `SQLConf` parameter if any `HiveConf` parameter can control
Spark internal behavior. Now, this PR is a very
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60553/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
**[Test build #60553 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60553/consoleFull)**
for PR 13679 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13682
**[Test build #60562 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60562/consoleFull)**
for PR 13682 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13682
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13682#discussion_r67109644
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/BatchEvalPythonExec.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ case class BatchEvalPythonExec(udfs:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13682
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60561/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13682
**[Test build #60561 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60561/consoleFull)**
for PR 13682 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13682
**[Test build #60561 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60561/consoleFull)**
for PR 13682 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679#discussion_r67109509
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SharedState.scala ---
@@ -66,6 +67,30 @@ private[sql] class SharedState(val sparkContext:
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13682
[SPARK-15888] [SQL] fix Python UDF with aggregate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After we move the ExtractPythonUDF rule into physical plan, Python UDF
can't work on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60556/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #60556 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60556/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563
**[Test build #60560 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60560/consoleFull)**
for PR 13563 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60560/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13681
**[Test build #60559 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60559/consoleFull)**
for PR 13681 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563
**[Test build #60560 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60560/consoleFull)**
for PR 13563 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
**[Test build #60558 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60558/consoleFull)**
for PR 13679 at commit
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13681
[SPARK-15960][SQL] Rename `spark.sql.enableFallBackToHdfsForStats` config
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since we are probably going to add more statistics related
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679#discussion_r67107457
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SharedState.scala ---
@@ -66,6 +67,30 @@ private[sql] class SharedState(val sparkContext:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
**[Test build #60557 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60557/consoleFull)**
for PR 11863 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #60556 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60556/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
[SPARK-15962][SQL] Introduce additonal implementation with a dense format
for UnsafeArrayData
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR introduces two implementations for
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
Can we put this in sql/core so it is not Hive specific?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13651
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60551/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13651
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13651
**[Test build #60551 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60551/consoleFull)**
for PR 13651 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13673
**[Test build #60555 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60555/consoleFull)**
for PR 13673 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13668#discussion_r67104751
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LocalRelation.scala
---
@@ -56,10 +57,12 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13661
**[Test build #60554 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60554/consoleFull)**
for PR 13661 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
**[Test build #60553 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60553/consoleFull)**
for PR 13679 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
cc @rxin @gatorsmile @andrewor14 for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13673
I am merging this patch to reduce conflicts. Merging to master and 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13679
[SPARK-15959] [SQL] Add the support of hive.metastore.warehouse.dir back
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the support of conf `hive.metastore.warehouse.dir` back.
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13678#discussion_r67104025
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -179,15 +179,16 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
case _ => false
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13678
**[Test build #60552 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60552/consoleFull)**
for PR 13678 at commit
701 - 789 of 789 matches
Mail list logo
