Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
**[Test build #61347 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61347/consoleFull)**
for PR 13921 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61347/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
**[Test build #61347 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61347/consoleFull)**
for PR 13921 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
I just merged #13927. So please fetch and merge the latest master if you
want to push an update to avoid merge conflict (hopefully none).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
@junyangq oh I got it thanks
@mengxr I just realized the `jekyll build ` is just copying over whatever
under `R/pkg/html/`, thanks for the tip
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13915
@dongjoon-hyun @rxin Is it necessary? `l` and `I` are similar but different
in most monospace fonts. Instead of banning `l`, we should ban using `I` as the
variable name, which is less often. `l` is
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13935
LGTM pending Jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13936
LGTM pending Jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921#discussion_r68693126
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -266,9 +266,9 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apriori,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13936
**[Test build #61346 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61346/consoleFull)**
for PR 13936 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13936
[SPARK-16243][ML] model loading backward compatibility for ml.feature.PCA
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16243
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13935
**[Test build #61345 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61345/consoleFull)**
for PR 13935 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13935
cc @hhbyyh @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13935
[SPARK-16242] [MLlib] [PySpark] Conversion between old/new matrix columns
in a DataFrame (Python)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements python wrappers for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61339/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13934
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61338/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13934
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
**[Test build #61339 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61339/consoleFull)**
for PR 13914 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13934
**[Test build #61338 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61338/consoleFull)**
for PR 13934 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61335/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
**[Test build #61335 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61335/consoleFull)**
for PR 13603 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61340/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
**[Test build #61340 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61340/consoleFull)**
for PR 13603 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68689623
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user avulanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
I used `makeQualifiedPath` from `SessionCatalog` to construct paths. It
uses hadoop's `Path` and `FileSystem`. Each attempt of path construction should
use this approach in order to be consistent
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
**[Test build #61344 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61344/consoleFull)**
for PR 13868 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
**[Test build #61343 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61343/consoleFull)**
for PR 13868 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61343/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
**[Test build #61343 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61343/consoleFull)**
for PR 13868 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930
ping @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13933
**[Test build #61342 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61342/consoleFull)**
for PR 13933 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
I'm already logging at error level a message about serializability /
suggestion to use map first before persist, which seems like the most common
case that will come up. I can do something
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13839
lgtm except that tiny issue
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
**[Test build #61341 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61341/consoleFull)**
for PR 13603 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13839#discussion_r68685732
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -251,7 +253,11 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
case seq: Seq[_] =>
Github user DoingDone9 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13130
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
**[Test build #61334 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61334/consoleFull)**
for PR 13927 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61334/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13858
@tmagrino could you add a simple test here:
Github user richardxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5275
what will be Java equivalent for import org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc._?
Which dependency I need to put in pom.xml? I am not able to find dependency
for maven pom.xml.
---
If your project is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68682430
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
**[Test build #61340 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61340/consoleFull)**
for PR 13603 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13934
**[Test build #61338 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61338/consoleFull)**
for PR 13934 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
**[Test build #61339 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61339/consoleFull)**
for PR 13914 at commit
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13934
[SPARK-16238] Metrics for generated method and class bytecode size
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This extends SPARK-15860 to include metrics for the actual bytecode
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13933
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61333/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61337 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61337/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13933
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13933
**[Test build #61333 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61333/consoleFull)**
for PR 13933 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13712#discussion_r68681679
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -472,6 +472,29 @@ To use a custom metrics.properties for the application
master and executors, upd
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13845
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13845
Sure! Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914#discussion_r68681583
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@ object Unidoc {
// Skip class names containing $ and some internal packages in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61336 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61336/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13845
(Now that this is merged, you'll have to close this PR manually since
GitHub can't auto-close it).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13845
LGTM as well, so I'm going to merge this to branch-1.6. Thanks @HyukjinKwon!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
**[Test build #61335 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61335/consoleFull)**
for PR 13603 at commit
Github user tmagrino commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13858
CCing some people who were involved in previous commits for this part of
the code, @tdas @zsxwing. Does this look good?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
**[Test build #61334 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61334/consoleFull)**
for PR 13927 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
Yeah, I guessed that its not a good idea, but I know some people do that.
So I wanted to understand what actually would happen.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921#discussion_r68679630
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -266,9 +266,9 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61332/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
**[Test build #61332 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61332/consoleFull)**
for PR 13921 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61331/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
**[Test build #61331 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61331/consoleFull)**
for PR 13921 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13933
**[Test build #61333 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61333/consoleFull)**
for PR 13933 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13933
cc @rxin @tdas @koertkuipers
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914#discussion_r68677923
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@ object Unidoc {
// Skip class names containing $ and some internal packages in Javadocs
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13923
@tanshai can you reopen? the history is messed up here. Perhaps you want to
open a pr against master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13933
[SPARK-16236] [SQL] Add Path Option back to Load API in DataFrameReader
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
@koertkuipers identified the PR
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13929
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
LGTM except one minor issue with `predict`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13929#discussion_r68677782
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -841,21 +841,29 @@ class SessionCatalog(
}
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927#discussion_r68677641
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -595,20 +597,14 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13929
LGTM - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
@keypointt For quicker tests, you can run `R/create-docs.sh` and then check
the html doc under `R/pkg/html`. It would be much faster than `jekyll build`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921#discussion_r68677380
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -266,9 +266,9 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apriori,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
**[Test build #61332 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61332/consoleFull)**
for PR 13921 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
**[Test build #61331 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61331/consoleFull)**
for PR 13921 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r68675928
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -135,7 +129,7 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r68675752
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -135,7 +129,7 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r68674971
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -135,7 +129,7 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13624
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13624
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61329/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13624
**[Test build #61329 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61329/consoleFull)**
for PR 13624 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r68674754
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -135,7 +129,7 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13932
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
could you please be more specific on `compact `? like what should be
changed then? I'm not getting it completely
I'm removing the duplicate arguments now
---
If your project is set up
GitHub user shubhamchopra opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13932
[SPARK-15354] [CORE] [WIP] Topology aware block replication strategies
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implementations of strategies for resilient block
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13931
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
101 - 200 of 613 matches
Mail list logo
