Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61709/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61709 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61709/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
[`3e3a794`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14042
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14042
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61711/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14042
**[Test build #61711 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61711/consoleFull)**
for PR 14042 at commit
[`edeeb14`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
@srowen thanks for the comment. Yea, I noticed that and I'm fixing this to
remove only shuffle files generated by `ShuffleExchange`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
#13804
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61707/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
Just for reference, what PR or JIRA is this backporting?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
**[Test build #61712 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61712/consoleFull)**
for PR 14043 at commit
[`a519540`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61707 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61707/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
[`6b82f6c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61706/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
[Minor][Core][backport] Fix display wrong free memory size in the log
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Free memory size displayed in the log is wrong (used memory), fix
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
**[Test build #61706 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61706/consoleFull)**
for PR 14036 at commit
[`ff97457`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14021
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
I don't think we do this in general. The shuffle files are supposed to
remain to potentially be reused if the stage needs to be re-executed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14021
Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61705/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61705 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61705/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
[`e21bdd9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13981
@MechCoder I left some inline comments. Thanks for adding this test case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14025
@liancheng Yes. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13981#discussion_r69410786
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/DecisionTreeRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -36,10 +37,21 @@ class DecisionTreeRegressorSuite
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13981#discussion_r69410553
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/DecisionTreeRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +108,15 @@ class DecisionTreeRegressorSuite
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14037
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14037
merging to master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12203
Maybe as you mentioned - skip adding to distributed cache and log warning -
is enough, throwing exception will fail the application and this is actually
not a fatal problem. I'm OK to change the c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14040
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14040
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61704/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14040
**[Test build #61704 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61704/consoleFull)**
for PR 14040 at commit
[`298ced4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user RicoGit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12203
Thanks, i understand this is different problems. What will you advice me? I
think that this is not good solution: `require(localizedPath != null)` just
fails with exception message "requirements fai
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14042
**[Test build #61711 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61711/consoleFull)**
for PR 14042 at commit
[`edeeb14`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14042
[SPARK-16329] [SQL] [Backport-1.6] Star Expansion over Table Containing No
Column #14040
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Star expansion over a table containing zero col
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12203
Can you make sure the problem you met is exactly the same as what this PR
solved? Since the exception stack you pasted in the StackOverFlow is different
from What I pasted here before. From you ex
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14037
Based on my understanding, previously, we had an Analyzer rule
`PreInsertionCasts`, which generates `InsertIntoHiveTable`
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13754/files#diff-ee66e11b56c2136
Github user janplus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
@cloud-fan Thank you for review.
I did some code style fixes as you suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61710 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61710/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
[`922e6e7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61709 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61709/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
[`3e3a794`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
**[Test build #61708 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61708/consoleFull)**
for PR 14041 at commit
[`5312215`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
[SPARK-16359][STREAMING][KAFKA] unidoc skip kafka 0.10
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
during sbt unidoc task, skip the streamingKafka010 subproject and filter
kafka 0.10
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69408201
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +656,163 @@ case class StringRPad(str:
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69408152
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +656,163 @@ case class StringRPad(str:
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69408137
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +656,163 @@ case class StringRPad(str:
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13804
OK, let me do it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user RicoGit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12203
Thanks for reply. I have [problem with running spark job with
oozie](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38144022/oozie-spark-action-requirement-failed).
This patch solves my problem. I applied this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user maropu reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
[SPARK-16317][SQL] Add a new interface to filter files in FileFormat
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to add an interface for filtering files in `FileFormat` not t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
**[Test build #61706 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61706/consoleFull)**
for PR 14036 at commit
[`ff97457`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user maropu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
@liancheng Could you review this after v2.0 released?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61707 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61707/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
[`6b82f6c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14037
LGTM, do you know why we have this before?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r69407742
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +284,75 @@ case class Divide(left: Express
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61701/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69407701
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +96,61 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerato
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
**[Test build #61701 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61701/consoleFull)**
for PR 14038 at commit
[`6770309`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69407665
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +96,61 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerator(
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69407641
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +96,61 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerato
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69407647
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
package org.apache.s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61705 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61705/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
[`e21bdd9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61702/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69407596
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +96,61 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerato
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
**[Test build #61702 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61702/consoleFull)**
for PR 14039 at commit
[`4e56d5b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004#discussion_r69407577
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ComplexTypeSuite.scala
---
@@ -246,4 +246,31 @@ class ComplexTypeSuite ext
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69407567
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +96,61 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerato
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69407491
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +96,61 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerator(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69407515
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
package org.apache.spark
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69407409
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +96,61 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerato
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14006
**[Test build #61703 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61703/consoleFull)**
for PR 14006 at commit
[`47c7b16`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14006
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14006
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61703/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13532
merging to master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69407065
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +96,61 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerato
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13532
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14037
cc @rxin @cloud-fan @liancheng @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69406936
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +96,61 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerator(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14037
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14037
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61700/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69406896
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +96,61 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerator(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14037
**[Test build #61700 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61700/consoleFull)**
for PR 14037 at commit
[`5530269`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13804
hi @jerryshao, let's also back-port this into 1.6.x
([MemoryStore.scala#L395](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/branch-1.6/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala#L395))
may
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14025
@WeichenXu123 Is this ready for review? If yes, please remove the WIP tag
in the PR description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14040
**[Test build #61704 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61704/consoleFull)**
for PR 14040 at commit
[`298ced4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69406199
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +656,163 @@ case class StringRPad(st
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69406176
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +656,163 @@ case class StringRPad(st
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14040
[SPARK-16329] [SQL] [Backport-2.0] Star Expansion over Table Containing No
Column
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Star expansion over a table containing zero column doe
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69406035
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +656,163 @@ case class StringRPad(st
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14006
**[Test build #61703 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61703/consoleFull)**
for PR 14006 at commit
[`47c7b16`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
**[Test build #61702 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61702/consoleFull)**
for PR 14039 at commit
[`4e56d5b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14039
[SPARK-15896][SQL] Clean up shuffle files just after jobs finished
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since `ShuffleRDD` in a SQL query could not be reuse later, this pr is to
r
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14025
cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
**[Test build #61701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61701/consoleFull)**
for PR 14038 at commit
[`6770309`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
[SPARK-16317][SQL] Add a new interface to filter files in FileFormat
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to add an interface for filtering files in `FileFormat` not to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14037
**[Test build #61700 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61700/consoleFull)**
for PR 14037 at commit
[`5530269`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14037
[SPARK-16358] [SQL] Remove LogicalPlan Node InsertIntoHiveTable
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
LogicalPlan `InsertIntoHiveTable` is useless. Thus, we can remove it fro
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
