Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14100
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14100
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61945/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14100
**[Test build #61945 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61945/consoleFull)**
for PR 14100 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
@gatorsmile This is the benchmark results. No significant difference.
Before this patch:
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_71-b15 on Linux
3.19.0-25-generic
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r70018330
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +654,145 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13890
**[Test build #61950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61950/consoleFull)**
for PR 13890 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61944/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
**[Test build #61944 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61944/consoleFull)**
for PR 14099 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071#discussion_r70017144
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreRelation.scala ---
@@ -162,25 +147,28 @@ private[hive] case class MetastoreRelation(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14028
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61943/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14028
**[Test build #61943 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61943/consoleFull)**
for PR 14028 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
**[Test build #61949 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61949/consoleFull)**
for PR 14102 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
Also - rather than having concrete implementations for all of these, why
don't we use RuntimeReplaceable?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61946/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
**[Test build #61946 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61946/consoleFull)**
for PR 14082 at commit
Github user husseinhazimeh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14101
@mengxr @sethah can you review this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
**[Test build #61948 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61948/consoleFull)**
for PR 14102 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
[SPARK-16434][SQL][WIP] Avoid record-per type dispatch in JSON when reading
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14101
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
Thanks a lot @tgravescs and @vanzin for your suggestions, I will change the
codes accordingly, greatly appreciate your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
GitHub user husseinhazimeh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14101
[SPARK-16431] [ML] Add a unified method that accepts single instances to
feature transformers and predictors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Current feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071#discussion_r70012893
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -403,17 +400,18 @@ object
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14094
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14094
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61936/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14094
**[Test build #61936 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61936/consoleFull)**
for PR 14094 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70012365
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
For this one I think we should consider supporting only foldable literals
for the path component.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14100
**[Test build #61945 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61945/consoleFull)**
for PR 14100 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
**[Test build #61946 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61946/consoleFull)**
for PR 14082 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13991
**[Test build #61947 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61947/consoleFull)**
for PR 13991 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14100
[SPARK-16433][SQL]Improve StreamingQuery.explain when no data arrives
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Display `No physical plan. Waiting for data.` instead of `N/A`
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
LGTM. Thanks @dongjoon-hyun -- Merging this to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Hi, @shivaram .
Now, it's ready for review again.
Please let me know if there is something to do more.
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61942/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user keypointt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70011796
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
**[Test build #61942 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61942/consoleFull)**
for PR 14096 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
Ping!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13374
@jurriaan should this be called quoteAll rather than escapeAll?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
LGTM except some minor comments, it's pretty close! One easy-to-ignore
comment: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680/files#r69849567
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user keypointt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70011133
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user keypointt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70011061
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680#discussion_r70010656
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680#discussion_r70010528
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -341,63 +327,115 @@ public UnsafeArrayData
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
**[Test build #61944 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61944/consoleFull)**
for PR 14099 at commit
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14099
[SPARK-16432] Empty blocks fail to serialize due to assert in
ChunkedByteBuffer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's possible to also change the callers to not pass in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14028
**[Test build #61943 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61943/consoleFull)**
for PR 14028 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
**[Test build #61942 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61942/consoleFull)**
for PR 14096 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14028
Thanks @yhuai! I just addressed your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70009456
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14098
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61941/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14098
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61940/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
**[Test build #61941 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61941/consoleFull)**
for PR 14096 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14098
**[Test build #61940 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61940/consoleFull)**
for PR 14098 at commit
Github user keypointt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70008864
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
**[Test build #61941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61941/consoleFull)**
for PR 14096 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70008649
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70008186
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -281,6 +300,174 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61938/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70008001
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
**[Test build #61938 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61938/consoleFull)**
for PR 14096 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70007837
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -682,11 +682,12 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user keypointt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70007444
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70007341
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14098
**[Test build #61940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61940/consoleFull)**
for PR 14098 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70007113
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70006954
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096#discussion_r70006844
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1804,11 +1804,11 @@ test_that("describe() and summarize() on a
DataFrame", {
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096#discussion_r70006591
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1804,11 +1804,11 @@ test_that("describe() and summarize() on a
DataFrame", {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61935/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
**[Test build #61935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61935/consoleFull)**
for PR 14096 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14097
**[Test build #61937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61937/consoleFull)**
for PR 14097 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14097
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14097
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61937/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70005830
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -236,29 +246,43 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14098
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14098
**[Test build #61939 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61939/consoleFull)**
for PR 14098 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14098
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61939/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70005741
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -52,13 +51,23 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{AccumulatorV2,
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70005706
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -153,6 +162,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14098
**[Test build #61939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61939/consoleFull)**
for PR 14098 at commit
Github user sharkdtu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
@tgravescs fixed the description and style
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14098
@liancheng Can you review it? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70005525
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14098
[SPARK-16380][SQL][Example]:Update SQL examples and programming guide for
Python language binding
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
**[Test build #61938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61938/consoleFull)**
for PR 14096 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70005272
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70005147
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70004452
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096#discussion_r7000
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1804,11 +1804,11 @@ test_that("describe() and summarize() on a
DataFrame", {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071#discussion_r70004411
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -939,42 +940,33 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
101 - 200 of 591 matches
Mail list logo