Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670#discussion_r70498405
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage-template.html
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+
+
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62178/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
**[Test build #62178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62178/consoleFull)**
for PR 13704 at commit
[`a236e5e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r70494401
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -327,6 +326,32 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf) ext
Github user harishreedharan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9875
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760
This is made obsolete by #14079; @mwws could you close the PR please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13658
@subrotosanyal ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62174/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #62174 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62174/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
[`34db7bb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13824
ping @KevinGrealish?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9875
ping @harishreedharan please close the PR if you don't intend to work on it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786
@jerryshao do you plan to implement either of the above suggestions?
otherwise we should probably close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12848
@amits83 could you close this PR if you're not going to address the
comments? thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080
@lovexi you should add your commit email to your github profile, so the
commit will show proper attribution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62175/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14138
**[Test build #62183 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62183/consoleFull)**
for PR 14138 at commit
[`b574c5d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
**[Test build #62175 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62175/consoleFull)**
for PR 14139 at commit
[`5aaa96b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62179/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
**[Test build #62179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62179/consoleFull)**
for PR 14036 at commit
[`d057546`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14113
**[Test build #62181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62181/consoleFull)**
for PR 14113 at commit
[`26bddfd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
**[Test build #62182 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62182/consoleFull)**
for PR 13756 at commit
[`08b5374`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14113
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
BTW instead of a whole new format, I think this should just be an option in
the existing text format.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
**[Test build #3187 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3187/consoleFull)**
for PR 14139 at commit
[`5aaa96b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Thank you for review and merging. @rxin @hvanhovell @cloud-fan .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151#discussion_r70480438
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileWholeTextReader.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62177/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
**[Test build #62177 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62177/consoleFull)**
for PR 14036 at commit
[`dabaadb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080
Merging in master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
Since this is so localized I'll also merge to 2.0 instead of waiting for
2.0.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
I'd have preferred `key` and `value` as different parameters, but I need to
go clean up this test suite in any case, so merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14146
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
**[Test build #62176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62176/consoleFull)**
for PR 14036 at commit
[`aae3194`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62176/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14146
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
**[Test build #62180 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62180/consoleFull)**
for PR 14158 at commit
[`626f3f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
GitHub user nblintao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
[SPARK-13547] [SQL] [WEBUI] Add SQL query in web UI's SQL Tab
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For the web UI, this PR adds the raw SQL query text for each execution in
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Thank you always, @hvanhovell . Annd, sorry for the delay. Since last
Saturday, I need to do some important personal stuff offline, so the time is
limited for me. :(
---
If your project is s
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14148
Also cc @huaiy @cloud-fan @liancheng @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
LGTM - Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11293#discussion_r70475334
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -127,33 +166,30 @@ abstract class Catalog {
* @
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14148
```
Seq("parquet", "json", "orc").foreach { fileFormat =>
withTable("t1") {
withTempPath { dir =>
val path = dir.getCanonicalPath
spark.ran
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
**[Test build #62179 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62179/consoleFull)**
for PR 14036 at commit
[`d057546`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
**[Test build #62178 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62178/consoleFull)**
for PR 13704 at commit
[`a236e5e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
**[Test build #62177 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62177/consoleFull)**
for PR 14036 at commit
[`dabaadb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
**[Test build #62176 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62176/consoleFull)**
for PR 14036 at commit
[`aae3194`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70471772
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -237,6 +229,9 @@ case class Divide(left: Expressi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132#discussion_r70471534
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -347,6 +347,15 @@ querySpecification
windows?
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
For the HINT_PREFIX, I tried at the first, but still have some problem. So,
I couldn't include the very previous commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
**[Test build #62175 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62175/consoleFull)**
for PR 14139 at commit
[`5aaa96b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #62174 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62174/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
[`34db7bb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149#discussion_r70469463
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2342,6 +2342,12 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* Return the i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
**[Test build #3186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3186/consoleFull)**
for PR 14139 at commit
[`5aaa96b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14157
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62173/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14157
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14157
**[Test build #62173 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62173/consoleFull)**
for PR 14157 at commit
[`022ffc1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
**[Test build #3187 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3187/consoleFull)**
for PR 14139 at commit
[`5aaa96b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
**[Test build #3186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3186/consoleFull)**
for PR 14139 at commit
[`5aaa96b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
tes this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14150
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14154
@hvanhovell I cannot find why Hive support it from
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1856.
But now many Spark users have used Hive before, So that make some previous
these queries f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14150
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62171/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14150
**[Test build #62171 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62171/consoleFull)**
for PR 14150 at commit
[`3127733`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14139
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8883
As we expose a new way to predict, maybe it would be good to also add a
note that transform can be more efficient by broadcasting the model in certain
cases or performing other optimizations, so as t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14154
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62169/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14154
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14154
**[Test build #62169 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62169/consoleFull)**
for PR 14154 at commit
[`7b64de2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14154
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62168/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14154
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14154
**[Test build #62168 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62168/consoleFull)**
for PR 14154 at commit
[`6eb9e8e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14156
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14156
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62172/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14156
**[Test build #62172 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62172/consoleFull)**
for PR 14156 at commit
[`c7b2059`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14157
**[Test build #62173 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62173/consoleFull)**
for PR 14157 at commit
[`022ffc1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70459222
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -237,6 +229,9 @@ case class Divide(left: Expressio
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14157
[SPARK-16500][ML][MLLib][Optimizer] add LBFGS convergence warning for all
used place in MLLib
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add warning_for the following case wh
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990#discussion_r70455921
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -393,3 +394,84 @@ case class CreateNamedSt
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62166/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #62166 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62166/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
[`1592ffc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14140#discussion_r70453024
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/IsotonicRegression.scala
---
@@ -408,8 +409,12 @@ class IsotonicRegression private (private
Github user neggert commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14140#discussion_r70451628
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/IsotonicRegression.scala
---
@@ -408,8 +409,12 @@ class IsotonicRegression private (private
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149#discussion_r70448559
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2342,6 +2342,12 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* Return th
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
changes LGTM, @vanzin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14140#discussion_r70451380
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/IsotonicRegression.scala
---
@@ -408,8 +409,12 @@ class IsotonicRegression private (private
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14156
**[Test build #62172 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62172/consoleFull)**
for PR 14156 at commit
[`c7b2059`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
301 - 400 of 555 matches
Mail list logo
