GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14187
[SPARK-16485][ML][DOC] Fix privacy of GLM members, rename sqlDataTypes for
ML, doc fixes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixing issues found during 2.0 API checks:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14184
**[Test build #62268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62268/consoleFull)**
for PR 14184 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62276/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183
**[Test build #62276 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62276/consoleFull)**
for PR 14183 at commit
Github user GayathriMurali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14112
@jkbradley I am sorry, I have been held up with something else. I am
looking on ways to add this to DistribtedLDA model. I will have something by
EOD today.
---
If your project is set up
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14173#discussion_r70705110
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -235,20 +248,16 @@ setMethod("cast",
function(x, dataType) {
if (is.character(dataType)) {
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14178#discussion_r70704632
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -111,19 +111,17 @@ head(df)
SparkR supports operating on a variety of data sources through the
`SparkDataFrame`
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14148
Many interesting observation after further investigation. Will post the
findings tonight. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14178#discussion_r70704012
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -138,6 +136,18 @@ printSchema(people)
# |-- age: long (nullable = true)
# |-- name: string (nullable = true)
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14177
Is there a reason why `enableHiveSupport = F` is required in all the test
cases ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14171
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158#discussion_r70703229
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/AllExecutionsPage.scala
---
@@ -146,11 +158,35 @@ private[ui] abstract class
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14090
@felixcheung Could you take one more look at this ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
I think thats where we are today. All query tests use LA and the harness
configures that. The problem before this PR was this one suite was setting LA
(due to its base class), and then UTC (due
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14171
Merging this to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183
**[Test build #62277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62277/consoleFull)**
for PR 14183 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183
Merging to master and 2.0. Tests dont matter here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183
**[Test build #62276 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62276/consoleFull)**
for PR 14183 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
They should extend a test that explicitly sets that if so, or else it only
happens to be set because of test ordering. The issue really is that it gets
set for all remaining tests not in SQL. That
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183#discussion_r70700875
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -626,52 +626,48 @@ The result tables would look something like the
following.
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183#discussion_r70700829
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -626,52 +626,48 @@ The result tables would look something like the
following.
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183#discussion_r70700857
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -626,52 +626,48 @@ The result tables would look something like the
following.
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183#discussion_r70700752
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -626,52 +626,48 @@ The result tables would look something like the
following.
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14112
@GayathriMurali I'd like to accelerate getting this merged. Please let me
know if you'd like help with it, especially with adding the fix for other LDA
classes. (We can collaborate on the same
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34
**[Test build #51 has
finished](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/51/consoleFull)**
for PR 34 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62271/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
**[Test build #62271 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62271/consoleFull)**
for PR 14182 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
All the tests in SQL are written to assume `Los_Angeles`, so I think this
is actually desired. Otherwise people have to configure their machine
specially to run spark tests.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62260/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #62260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62260/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
It may be a secondary point, but `QueryTest` should reset the timezone like
the code being removed does. Right now it means that the timezone default stays
changed for any other tests in the JVM.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
Thanks, merging to master and 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
Created JIRA
[SPARK-16531](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16531)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
**[Test build #62275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62275/consoleFull)**
for PR 14022 at commit
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
@tgravescs, I think addressed the comments mentioned above.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62259/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
**[Test build #62259 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62259/consoleFull)**
for PR 14022 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62274/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14186
Yeah! : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14186
Pretty trivial :), but LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62258/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62258 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62258/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
Error message from build: `ERROR: Step ?Publish JUnit test result report?
failed: No test report files were found. Configuration error?`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
Merging with master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14186
**[Test build #62273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62273/consoleFull)**
for PR 14186 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62266/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
**[Test build #62266 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62266/consoleFull)**
for PR 14147 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14184
**[Test build #62272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62272/consoleFull)**
for PR 14184 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14186
[SPARK-16530] [SQL] [TRIVIAL] Wrong Parser Keyword in ALTER TABLE CHANGE
COLUMN
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Based on the [Hive SQL
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62257/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #62257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62257/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
**[Test build #62271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62271/consoleFull)**
for PR 14182 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
**[Test build #62270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62270/consoleFull)**
for PR 14167 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62270/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62256/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #62256 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62256/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
We should put this in 2.0 for whoever merges.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
LGTM, can you make a JIRA? Its a little scary to change tests w/o one in
case there is flakiness.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162#discussion_r70688262
--- Diff:
common/network-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/yarn/YarnShuffleService.java
---
@@ -70,6 +70,11 @@
private static final
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
**[Test build #62270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62270/consoleFull)**
for PR 14167 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
minor suggestion on docs, otherwise looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162#discussion_r70687988
--- Diff:
common/network-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/yarn/YarnShuffleService.java
---
@@ -70,6 +70,11 @@
private static
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183#discussion_r70687523
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -626,52 +626,95 @@ The result tables would look something like the
following.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62269/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62269/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14183#discussion_r70687380
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -626,52 +626,95 @@ The result tables would look something like the
following.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62269/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14184
**[Test build #62268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62268/consoleFull)**
for PR 14184 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14185
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user andreweduffy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14185
[SPARK-16511][SUBMIT] Expose SparkLauncher's ProcessBuilder for user
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expose the `ProcessBuilder` in `SparkLauncher`, as well as
Github user kishorvpatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670#discussion_r70686785
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -288,7 +288,11 @@ where `[base-app-id]` is the YARN application ID.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62267/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62267/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14184
[SPARK-16529][SQL][TEST] `withTempDatabase` should set `default` database
before dropping
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`SQLTestUtils.withTempDatabase` is a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62267/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34
**[Test build #51 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/51/consoleFull)**
for PR 34 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
**[Test build #62266 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62266/consoleFull)**
for PR 14147 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62265/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
**[Test build #62265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62265/consoleFull)**
for PR 14182 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62261/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
201 - 300 of 681 matches
Mail list logo
