Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62497/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
**[Test build #62497 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62497/consoleFull)**
for PR 14174 at commit
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14204
@ajbozarth Thanks for pointing out how to fix this. I'll try to fix it
tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
First of all, I will update this right now.
Second, 10+ rules mean?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62494/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
Sure. I've been looking that. It's on my list.
I'll make a JIRA issue and proceed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
**[Test build #62494 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62494/consoleFull)**
for PR 14022 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Is there a better way to handle sql generation that's not adding 10+ rules?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Can you update this now the sql generation pull request has been merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14252
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
@dongjoon-hyun can you also look into having stable identifiers for
gen_attr? Right now the golden files look really weird because gen_attr is used
more than once.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
Oh, thank you for merging, @rxin ! Also, thank you for review, @gatorsmile
and @liancheng .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
This looks pretty solid! I left some non-critical comments around
readability and structuring. I'll take a pass on the test suites once those are
addressed.
---
If your project is set up
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71254476
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/RowBasedHashMapGenerator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,338 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14252#discussion_r71254442
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -115,9 +115,11 @@ class SparkSession private(
/**
* A
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
Thanks - merging in master / 2.0.
I'm also merging this in 2.0 since it is a test only change and will reduce
merge conflicts.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71254165
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71254034
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253992
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#discussion_r71254024
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ShuffleIndexRecord.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253933
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253903
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253796
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
@techaddict Can you test the performance with and without your change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ooq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253773
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62495/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253765
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
**[Test build #62495 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62495/consoleFull)**
for PR 14251 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253615
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253373
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253434
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253283
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253225
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253164
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253124
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#discussion_r71253134
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ShuffleIndexCache.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13950
I'll try and take a look at this tomorrow
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71253029
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71252969
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Sorry I couldn't get to this today, I'll do my best to take a look in the
morning
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
I'll try to take a look at this tomorrow
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174#discussion_r71252862
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/RowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14204
I'll try to take a look at this tomorrow, but you're failing MiMa tests
because you added a param to `ExecutorInfo` which is part of the developer api.
You'll have to add an exclude to
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#discussion_r71251461
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ShuffleIndexCache.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#discussion_r71251332
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ShuffleIndexInformation.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#discussion_r71251280
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ShuffleIndexCache.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#discussion_r71251245
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockResolver.java
---
@@ -66,6 +67,16 @@
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#discussion_r71251177
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ShuffleIndexRecord.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#discussion_r71251123
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ShuffleIndexInformation.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
Ah. I see. I missed that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62491/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
**[Test build #62491 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62491/consoleFull)**
for PR 14132 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
@dongjoon-hyun again we cannot change the type checking for coalesce. Let's
not confuse analyzer level type coercion with type checking in expressions for
resolution.
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62493/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user benmccann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13986
>At least run the script that updates the deps/ files to see that impact
Can you point me to the script you're referring to?
> Figure out what the upside is in updating to 1.8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
**[Test build #62493 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62493/consoleFull)**
for PR 14235 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251#discussion_r71247244
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2965,4 +2965,19 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14250
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
**[Test build #62499 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62499/consoleFull)**
for PR 14251 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14250
LGTM. Merging this to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
**[Test build #62498 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62498/consoleFull)**
for PR 14174 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
Yep. Thank you for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14252#discussion_r71243812
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -115,9 +115,11 @@ class SparkSession private(
/**
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
We need that checking. Coalesce supports multiple types because in the
analyzer (TypeCoercion) we explicitly coerce the types.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
Basically, `Coalesce` also should accept various types.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
I'll check them more.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
I think so since NullFunctionSuite is passed. If there is side-effect, I
will handle them too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
**[Test build #62489 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62489/consoleFull)**
for PR 14022 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
**[Test build #62497 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62497/consoleFull)**
for PR 14174 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62489/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14252
**[Test build #62496 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62496/consoleFull)**
for PR 14252 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
Doesn't this break coalesce's type checking?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14252
[SPARK-16615][SQL] Expose sqlContext in SparkSession
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch removes the private[spark] qualifier for
SparkSession.sqlContext, as discussed
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
**[Test build #62495 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62495/consoleFull)**
for PR 14251 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14251
[SPARK-16602][SQL] Coalesce should support various types.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```
sql("select nvl('0', '1'), nvl('0', 1)")
```
## How
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62488/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
**[Test build #62488 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62488/consoleFull)**
for PR 14022 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62485/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
**[Test build #62485 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62485/consoleFull)**
for PR 14022 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
**[Test build #62494 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62494/consoleFull)**
for PR 14022 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14250
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62492/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14250
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14250
**[Test build #62492 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62492/consoleFull)**
for PR 14250 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
Jenkins is restarted, but the current last commit is efaa4d0 having the
passed Jenkins test. Could you review and merge this first if possible, @rxin ?
```
Test build #62469 has
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
**[Test build #62493 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62493/consoleFull)**
for PR 14235 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
Hmm, HiveCompatibilitySuite has some dependency on `gen_attr_`. I reverted
the last attempt.
I will try as another PR as planed before.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14225
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14225
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62484/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14225
**[Test build #62484 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62484/consoleFull)**
for PR 14225 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62487/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14235
**[Test build #62487 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62487/consoleFull)**
for PR 14235 at commit
101 - 200 of 513 matches
Mail list logo
