Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400#discussion_r72897142
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user eyalfa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400
@cloud-fan, any update on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
**[Test build #63075 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63075/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14258#discussion_r72950957
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/install.R ---
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
#' \code{without-hadoop}.
#'
#' @param hadoopVersion Version of Hadoop to install. Default
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14258#discussion_r72950905
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/install.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14435
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14435
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63074/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14435
**[Test build #63074 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63074/consoleFull)**
for PR 14435 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14391
cc @mengxr what's the plan for UDT? Is it a public API now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user phalodi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14436
@srowen @rxin Hey guyss i make changes as you suggested but yeah it not
exactly what you suggested, i change in example which is also reflect in
documentation, so please review it and give give
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14436
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user phalodi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14436
modify java example which is also refelect in documentation exmaple
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify java example which is also reflect in document.
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14363
Well, Spark SQL is not announced to be fully compatible with hive, I think
it's reasonable to have some issues. cc @rxin @yhuai should we fix this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks for working on this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63073/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
**[Test build #63073 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63073/consoleFull)**
for PR 14155 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14363
@cloud-fan There is a case that i met. The varchar(length)/char(length)
type is not a String Type. But now SparkSQL consider them a string type. So
there are different result with the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14435
**[Test build #63074 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63074/consoleFull)**
for PR 14435 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14435
[SPARK-16756][SQL][WIP] Add `sql` function to LogicalPlan and `NonSQLPlan`
trait
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a part of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14434
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63072/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14434
**[Test build #63072 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63072/consoleFull)**
for PR 14434 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63070/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673
**[Test build #63070 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63070/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14401
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601
@hhbyyh could you update the since annotations to target `2.1.0`?
@jkbradley if you have a chance to review would be great. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118
Here are some findings as I dug a little:
1. Since https://github.com/databricks/spark-csv/pull/102(Jul, 2015), we
would cast `""` as `null` for all types other than strings. For strings,
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
cc also @xsankar who was interested on the related JIRAs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14363
Your concern is valid. We are missing the test cases for verifying these
scenarios.
I saw a discussion in a wechat group about the issue in integration between
Hive and Spark. They are
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896#discussion_r72931611
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/recommendation.py ---
@@ -332,6 +338,20 @@ def getFinalStorageLevel(self):
"""
return
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
**[Test build #63073 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63073/consoleFull)**
for PR 14155 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r72930383
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -359,40 +357,6 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14391
ping @cloud-fan Please take a look this. Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
@yhuai As 2.0 is released now, do you have time to check this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63069/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
**[Test build #63069 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63069/consoleFull)**
for PR 14433 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
LGTM pending since tags. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
@junyangq Yanbo has pointed me an example of adding weightcol. I will
update this PR tomorrow.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14434
**[Test build #63072 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63072/consoleFull)**
for PR 14434 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63071/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673
**[Test build #63071 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63071/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14434
cc @yhuai @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14434
[SPARK-16828][SQL] remove MaxOf and MinOf
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
These 2 expressions are not needed anymore after we have `Greatest` and
`Least`. This PR
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673
**[Test build #63071 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63071/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673
**[Test build #63070 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63070/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
**[Test build #63069 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63069/consoleFull)**
for PR 14433 at commit
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
[SPARK-16829][SparkR]:sparkR sc.setLogLevel doesn't work
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
./bin/sparkR
GitHub user cloud-fan reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673
[SPARK-13853][SQL] QueryPlan sub-classes should override producedAttributes
to fix missingInput
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some operators will produce new
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
301 - 354 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
