Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #63289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63289/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14513
**[Test build #63298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63298/consoleFull)**
for PR 14513 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63287/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14513
@davies Updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
**[Test build #63287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63287/consoleFull)**
for PR 14511 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701#discussion_r73774422
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -199,6 +209,19 @@ private[sql] case class
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73774227
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
**[Test build #63297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63297/consoleFull)**
for PR 14472 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14266
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14266
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63296/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14266
**[Test build #63296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63296/consoleFull)**
for PR 14266 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14266
**[Test build #63296 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63296/consoleFull)**
for PR 14266 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701#discussion_r73773948
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -368,73 +378,75 @@ class
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14176
@davies @sameeragarwal I updated more results in the benchmark PR
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14266 .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14266
@davies Added some test results with larger number of distinct keys.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14510
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
**[Test build #63295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63295/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14510
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63286/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14510
**[Test build #63286 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63286/consoleFull)**
for PR 14510 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
Is this a bug fix? If yes, shouldn't we merge it in 2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user keypointt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14489#discussion_r73773463
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ setOldClass("structType")
#'\dontrun{
#' sparkR.session()
#' df <-
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14489#discussion_r73773220
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ setOldClass("structType")
#'\dontrun{
#' sparkR.session()
#' df <-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746
**[Test build #63294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63294/consoleFull)**
for PR 11746 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746
Thanks for the review @vanzin! Style issues have been fixed and renamed
'Launch' to 'Run' where appropriate.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14516
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14516
**[Test build #63293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63293/consoleFull)**
for PR 14516 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14516
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63293/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746#discussion_r73771605
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverRunner.scala ---
@@ -78,49 +80,53 @@ private[deploy] class DriverRunner(
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746#discussion_r73771392
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverRunner.scala ---
@@ -53,9 +53,11 @@ private[deploy] class DriverRunner(
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14513
@davies Makes sense. I'll update the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14311
**[Test build #3204 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3204/consoleFull)**
for PR 14311 at commit
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14513
It's not necessary, but more clear (consistent)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14509
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14509
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63285/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14509
**[Test build #63285 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63285/consoleFull)**
for PR 14509 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746
Looks sane to me, but needs some style updates.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746#discussion_r73770621
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverRunner.scala ---
@@ -168,7 +173,24 @@ private[deploy] class DriverRunner(
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14516
screenshot above. it looks like some lines are cutout, but that was just
an artifact of the screenshot, those lines are not modified.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746#discussion_r73770529
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverRunner.scala ---
@@ -78,49 +80,53 @@ private[deploy] class DriverRunner(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14497
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14513
@davies It should be fine right? Now we don't have recursions. We don't
need to force `dictionaryIds` instance outside of `ColumnVector` class to use
that method.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14516
**[Test build #63293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63293/consoleFull)**
for PR 14516 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14516
![screenshot](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/4534389/17452512/8e523b04-5b24-11e6-8972-fc700d3adc8c.png)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63288/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14516
[SPARK-15702][DOCS] Changed programming guide to not reference old
accumulator API in Scala
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the programming guide, the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109
**[Test build #63288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63288/consoleFull)**
for PR 14109 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14508
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14508
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63284/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14514
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14514
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63292/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14514
**[Test build #63292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63292/consoleFull)**
for PR 14514 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14508
**[Test build #63284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63284/consoleFull)**
for PR 14508 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14497
Thanks for reviewing! I am merging this to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746#discussion_r73769000
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverRunner.scala ---
@@ -53,9 +53,11 @@ private[deploy] class DriverRunner(
@volatile
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746#discussion_r73768915
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverRunner.scala ---
@@ -78,49 +80,53 @@ private[deploy] class DriverRunner(
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746#discussion_r73768879
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverRunner.scala ---
@@ -78,49 +80,53 @@ private[deploy] class DriverRunner(
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14461
I forgot to comment, but I did check this out and it runs well, I still
think the link on the app summary is redundant though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746#discussion_r73768813
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverRunner.scala ---
@@ -78,49 +80,53 @@ private[deploy] class DriverRunner(
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746#discussion_r73768836
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverRunner.scala ---
@@ -78,49 +80,53 @@ private[deploy] class DriverRunner(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14500
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63283/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14515
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14500
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user dafrista opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14515
[SPARK-16926] [SQL] Remove partition columns from partition metadata.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This removes partition columns from column metadata of partitions
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14500
**[Test build #63283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63283/consoleFull)**
for PR 14500 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14514
**[Test build #63292 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63292/consoleFull)**
for PR 14514 at commit
GitHub user mgummelt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14514
document that Mesos cluster mode supports python
update docs to be consistent with SPARK-14645
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14645
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14513
We should also update VectorizedColumnReader.decodeDictionaryIds() to use
the new method.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14176
Let's hold on this, if we are going to have single implementation for fast
hash map (based on the benchmark result in another PR), do need to merge this
fancy implementation choosing. cc @rxin
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14513
**[Test build #63291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63291/consoleFull)**
for PR 14513 at commit
GitHub user ooq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14513
[SPARK-16928][SQL] Recursive call of ColumnVector::getInt() breaks JIT
inlining
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In both `OnHeapColumnVector` and `OffHeapColumnVector`, we
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14513
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14508
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63281/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14508
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14389
Which part do you want me to update? I thought you've already committed the
changes needed. Let me know and I will update this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12694
Update: I thought about using argument files, but they're only supported by
javac (`javac @argfile`) and not by java. So if fixing anything, I'm in favor
of:
- removing the use of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14508
**[Test build #63281 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63281/consoleFull)**
for PR 14508 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118
You can specify "com.databricks.spark.csv" as the source.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:58 PM, djk121 wrote:
> Is there a way to fall back to the old
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14512
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14512
**[Test build #63290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63290/consoleFull)**
for PR 14512 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14512
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63290/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14512
**[Test build #63290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63290/consoleFull)**
for PR 14512 at commit
GitHub user mgummelt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14512
[WIP] Add SSL support to dispatcher and spark-submit
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14510
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14484
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14484
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63280/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14484
**[Test build #63280 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63280/consoleFull)**
for PR 14484 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109
**[Test build #63288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63288/consoleFull)**
for PR 14109 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #63289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63289/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14371
Looks pretty good, can you remove the wip from the pr title?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14371#discussion_r73765309
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/FileBasedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -231,13 +232,17 @@ private[streaming] class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14371#discussion_r73765169
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala
---
@@ -443,6 +445,9 @@ private[state]
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14109#discussion_r73765222
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -996,19 +1013,24 @@ private class LeastSquaresCostFun(
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14371#discussion_r73765083
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala
---
@@ -278,14 +278,15 @@ private[state]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
**[Test build #63287 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63287/consoleFull)**
for PR 14511 at commit
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
@skonto Can you take a look at this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511#discussion_r73764731
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -358,14 +358,12 @@ private[spark] class
GitHub user mgummelt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
[SPARK-16927] [SPARK-16923] Override task properties at dispatcher.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- enable setting default properties for all jobs submitted through
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14308
Thanks @srowen!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
101 - 200 of 485 matches
Mail list logo