Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
**[Test build #63464 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63464/consoleFull)**
for PR 14511 at commit
[`81f2b1c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63468/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
**[Test build #63468 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63468/consoleFull)**
for PR 14527 at commit
[`fdeb02e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14571
**[Test build #63477 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63477/consoleFull)**
for PR 14571 at commit
[`2c875dc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14571
[SPARK-16983][SQL] Add `prettyName` for row_number, dense_rank,
percent_rank, cume_dist
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, two-word window functions like
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63470/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63470 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63470/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`1107182`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74159170
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,119 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14570
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14570
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63463/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524#discussion_r74159065
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/shared.py ---
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ class HasSeed(Params):
def __init__(self):
super(HasSeed,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14570
**[Test build #63463 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63463/consoleFull)**
for PR 14570 at commit
[`0cf8f43`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14560
(BTW, it seems this is what hive does)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
**[Test build #63476 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63476/consoleFull)**
for PR 14472 at commit
[`5eb01fe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14569
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63461/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14569
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14569
**[Test build #63461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63461/consoleFull)**
for PR 14569 at commit
[`1b17aff`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63460/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
**[Test build #63460 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63460/consoleFull)**
for PR 14552 at commit
[`880a1f4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
+1 for changing this. If left as is, JIRAs like this one will be a
recurring theme. A lot of users would probably not even notice, then wind up
getting degraded results and not know why.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63475 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63475/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`4d0cd3a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74158089
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,119 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedule
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74158079
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,119 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedule
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74157953
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,119 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedule
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63469/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63469 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63469/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`f78d6aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74156824
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,119 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
CC: @hhbyyh Would you mind taking a look at this since you're familiar with
GBTs? Thanks in advance! This should be one of the most important
improvements in terms of accuracy, especially once w
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
**[Test build #3210 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3210/consoleFull)**
for PR 14547 at commit
[`fe256f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74156582
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,119 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74156410
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,119 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63466/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63466 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63466/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`81e342d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74155413
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,119 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63447/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
**[Test build #63447 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63447/consoleFull)**
for PR 14547 at commit
[`fe256f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74155283
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,119 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
**[Test build #63474 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63474/consoleFull)**
for PR 14537 at commit
[`75bca1b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63473 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63473/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`b713f23`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
Thank you so much! Then, see you later. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user rajeshbalamohan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
Thanks @mallman . Fixed review comments in latest commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
@dongjoon-hyun I'll take a look in the morning (CET)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63457/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
**[Test build #63457 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63457/consoleFull)**
for PR 14531 at commit
[`6180e80`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63472 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63472/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`8198d9c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63472/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397#discussion_r74153582
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -125,21 +125,23 @@ class Analyzer(
object CT
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
Could you review this PR again, @hvanhovell ?
Last time, I did a huge mistake, but now I think I fixed correct according
to your advice.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63472 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63472/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`8198d9c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14258#discussion_r74152794
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/install.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor lice
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12990#discussion_r74151754
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -137,6 +138,17 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf) extend
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
Hi, @cloud-fan .
Could you review this PR when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
**[Test build #63471 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63471/consoleFull)**
for PR 14472 at commit
[`0359756`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63470 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63470/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`1107182`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63459/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63459 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63459/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`46ea8a4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472
I have updated this based on review feedback. The harness is now using
hiveResultString() rather than show(), similar to the existing Hive
compatibility test.
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12990
I'll create a new pr based on this one with a higher default max tasks
(maybe 10,000?) and an on/off config when I have time this week
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63469 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63469/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`f78d6aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
So I'm still confused what offset does, even after reading the code. Can
you please write a more clear documentation? An example would help.
Also let's update the Python API as well, and add an
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74146966
--- Diff: .gitignore ---
@@ -77,3 +77,8 @@ spark-warehouse/
# For R session data
.RData
.RHistory
+.Rhistory
--- End diff --
Du
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
**[Test build #63468 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63468/consoleFull)**
for PR 14527 at commit
[`fdeb02e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
A high-level question: is it a problem when the offset is larger than `1 <<
33`? I can't really think of one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568#discussion_r74145985
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/MonotonicallyIncreasingID.scala
---
@@ -40,13 +40,14 @@ import org.apache.spark
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568#discussion_r74145557
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -993,12 +993,31 @@ object functions {
* This expression would return
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14570
Thank you so much, @hvanhovell !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14570
LGTM - I'll merge as soon as test pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14431
Sure - Appending more information to the R object is fine. Also it looks
like we actually have a handle to the RelationalGroupedDataset when we call
groupBy on the scala side
https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #63467 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63467/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
[`d9a269d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63466 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63466/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`81e342d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14570
Could you review this PR when you have some time, @hvanhovell ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475
**[Test build #63465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63465/consoleFull)**
for PR 14475 at commit
[`6ce70a9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
**[Test build #63464 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63464/consoleFull)**
for PR 14511 at commit
[`81f2b1c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14570
**[Test build #63463 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63463/consoleFull)**
for PR 14570 at commit
[`0cf8f43`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
GitHub user tejasapatil reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475
[SPARK-16862] Configurable buffer size in `UnsafeSorterSpillReader`
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16862
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12990
Yeah. That might be a much larger change though too. Ideally the history
server is smart and can load just meta data quickly to list application, then
if application actually clicked it would loa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63462 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63462/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`ea77d78`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63462/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14570
[SPARK-10601][SQL] Support `MINUS` set operator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `MINUS` set operator which is equivalent `EXCEPT DISTINCT`.
This will
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63462 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63462/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`ea77d78`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63450/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568#discussion_r74140971
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/MonotonicallyIncreasingID.scala
---
@@ -40,13 +40,14 @@ import org.apache
Github user tejasapatil closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14475
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
**[Test build #63450 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63450/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`50a34b8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14569
**[Test build #63461 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63461/consoleFull)**
for PR 14569 at commit
[`1b17aff`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14569
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14569
OK. Feel free to look for other typos to include in a PR like this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
**[Test build #63460 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63460/consoleFull)**
for PR 14552 at commit
[`880a1f4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14544
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
301 - 400 of 768 matches
Mail list logo
