Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14596
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user jagadeesanas2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14596
[SPARK-12370] [Documentation] [Documentation should link to examples â¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When documentation is built is should reference examples f
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14594#discussion_r74374927
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -547,8 +547,7 @@ class Analyzer(
case a: Agg
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14594#discussion_r74374768
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -547,8 +547,7 @@ class Analyzer(
case a: Agg
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74374585
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,289 @@ import org.apache.spark.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74374015
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,289 @@ import org.apache.spark.ut
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74373952
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,289 @@ import org.apache.spark.ut
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63582/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397#discussion_r74373762
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2938,4 +2938,26 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Share
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74373725
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,289 @@ import org.apache.spark.ut
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
**[Test build #63582 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63582/consoleFull)**
for PR 14592 at commit
[`76defce`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397#discussion_r74373681
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2938,4 +2938,26 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Share
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14454
I'm sort of neutral on the change - it's certainly unfortunate about the
naming, but it's not such a big deal IMO. However, now that we're here I do
agree that it should be "private" so ok to make th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14595
**[Test build #63591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63591/consoleFull)**
for PR 14595 at commit
[`3b9540c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74373524
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,289 @@ import org.apache.spark.ut
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397#discussion_r74373465
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2938,4 +2938,26 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Share
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14594
Everything is tested here: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14595
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
GitHub user petermaxlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14595
[SPARK-17015][SQL] group-by/order-by ordinal and arithmetic tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds three test files:
1. arithmetic.sql.out
2. order
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14579
After looking at it and considering all the above, I would say the options
are (1) do nothing; or (2) if we want to support this use case, then we
implement a single utility method (I would say calle
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14579
@nchammas a utility method (e.g. `cached`) - actually it will be a context
manager class implemented in the same way as `closing` - will work because it
only needs to return the context manager, not
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
@yhuai I ran another benchmark for the scan operation. The results are
updated in the pr description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14594#discussion_r74373149
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -547,8 +547,7 @@ class Analyzer(
case a: A
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63579/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397#discussion_r74372952
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2938,4 +2938,26 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLConte
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
**[Test build #63579 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63579/consoleFull)**
for PR 14546 at commit
[`32c639c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63580/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74372641
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,289 @@ import org.apache.spark.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
**[Test build #63580 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63580/consoleFull)**
for PR 14592 at commit
[`1a7cdc0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14594
**[Test build #63590 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63590/consoleFull)**
for PR 14594 at commit
[`3e1b6b3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
GitHub user petermaxlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14594
[SPARK-17016][SQL] Improve group-by/order-by ordinal error reporting
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch improves error handling for group-by/order-by ordinals:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63578/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63577/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
**[Test build #63578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63578/consoleFull)**
for PR 14397 at commit
[`178813e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
**[Test build #63577 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63577/consoleFull)**
for PR 14397 at commit
[`624bb3d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
**[Test build #63589 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63589/consoleFull)**
for PR 14583 at commit
[`d23d348`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74372103
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,289 @@ import org.apache.spark.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63581/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
**[Test build #63581 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63581/consoleFull)**
for PR 14583 at commit
[`d23d348`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74371723
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,289 @@ import org.apache.spark.ut
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14579
Right I wouldn't expect it to error with subclassing - just not pipeline
successfully - but only in a very long shot corner case.
I think the try/finally with persistance is not an uncommon
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
Oracle supports it...
http://docs.oracle.com/javadb/10.10.1.2/ref/rrefsqljusing.html
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #63588 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63588/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
[`cb07c1d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14590
**[Test build #3216 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3216/consoleFull)**
for PR 14590 at commit
[`e061820`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14454
ping @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
**[Test build #63587 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63587/consoleFull)**
for PR 14559 at commit
[`57be055`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14591
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user GraceH commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
@HyukjinKwon and @srowen, here is the initial proposal. Please let me know
your comment. I will refine that with unit test later.
BTW, the readwriter.py calls high level api of jdbc(url, tabl
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14591
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592#discussion_r74370013
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/number-format.sql.out ---
@@ -19,16 +19,24 @@ struct<2147483648:bigint,(-2147483649):bigint>
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
Which NoSQL platforms support `Using Outer Join`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
**[Test build #63586 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63586/consoleFull)**
for PR 14593 at commit
[`e4a832e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63586/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
@yhuai You mean just using `sql("SELECT * FROM t").count()`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775#discussion_r74369496
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/orc/VectorizedSparkOrcNewRecordReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592#discussion_r74369492
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/number-format.sql.out ---
@@ -19,16 +19,24 @@ struct<2147483648:bigint,(-2147483649):bigint>
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592#discussion_r74369336
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/number-format.sql.out ---
@@ -19,16 +19,24 @@ struct<2147483648:bigint,(-2147483649):bigint>
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592#discussion_r74369163
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/number-format.sql.out ---
@@ -19,16 +19,24 @@ struct<2147483648:bigint,(-2147483649):bigint>
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
**[Test build #63586 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63586/consoleFull)**
for PR 14593 at commit
[`e4a832e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63583/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592#discussion_r74369002
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/number-format.sql.out ---
@@ -19,16 +19,24 @@ struct<2147483648:bigint,(-2147483649):bigint>
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
**[Test build #63583 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63583/consoleFull)**
for PR 14593 at commit
[`3cff947`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592#discussion_r74368974
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/number-format.sql.out ---
@@ -19,16 +19,24 @@ struct<2147483648:bigint,(-2147483649):bigint>
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
**[Test build #63585 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63585/consoleFull)**
for PR 13775 at commit
[`06066eb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user dafrista commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775#discussion_r74368871
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/orc/VectorizedSparkOrcNewRecordReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
I'd like to do it incrementally, and ideally one SQL testing file(xxx.sql)
one PR, but we can have many PRs at the same time, they are not likely to get
conflicted.
---
If your project is set up
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14590#discussion_r74368764
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -126,14 +129,18 @@ class SQLQueryTestSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedS
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592#discussion_r74368708
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/number-format.sql.out ---
@@ -19,16 +19,24 @@ struct<2147483648:bigint,(-2147483649):bigint>
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
**[Test build #63584 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63584/consoleFull)**
for PR 14580 at commit
[`ddb4ddd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14590#discussion_r74368596
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -126,14 +129,18 @@ class SQLQueryTestSuite extends QueryTest with
Sh
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63576/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
I think we should think out of the SQL box. We know that Spark is not a
subset of DBMS.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
**[Test build #63576 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63576/consoleFull)**
for PR 14568 at commit
[`b4d4ea6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
for the benchmark, how about we just test the scan operation?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
Also just for reviewers, the inconsistent stuffs I listed in the PR
description happen randomly across documentation. So, this fixes them to be
consistent according to style guide lines and rese
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
BTW, this is not fixing some wrong examples and inconsistent indentation
codes in `structured-streaming-programming-guide.md` because
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14564 is handling them.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
**[Test build #63583 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63583/consoleFull)**
for PR 14593 at commit
[`3cff947`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
[MINOR][DOCS] Fix style in examples and inconsistent indentation across
documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the documentation as below:
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
@cloud-fan after adding enough features to the test harness, do you think I
should port all tests over in a single pull request, or more incremental?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
Not sure which RDBMS are supporting `Using Outer Join`. `NULL` generated by
outer joins are removed. This sounds a little bit strange. After all, `NULL`
also has a meaning.
In the plan
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14592
**[Test build #63582 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63582/consoleFull)**
for PR 14592 at commit
[`76defce`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775#discussion_r74367827
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/orc/VectorizedSparkOrcNewRecordReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14588
Oh I'm so sorry. It's breaking 2.10 anyway.
I'll double check scala version compatibility next time submitting a PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user keypointt closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14588
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63575/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
**[Test build #63575 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63575/consoleFull)**
for PR 14102 at commit
[`bceda7b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14589
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
1 - 100 of 712 matches
Mail list logo