Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
**[Test build #63631 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63631/consoleFull)**
for PR 14546 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63675/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
**[Test build #63637 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63637/consoleFull)**
for PR 14397 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
@dilipbiswal yea. Only when the execution result of CommonSubquery is
asked, it will be materialized then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #63665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63665/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14609
**[Test build #63659 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63659/consoleFull)**
for PR 14609 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14586
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14607
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
**[Test build #63675 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63675/consoleFull)**
for PR 14559 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14596
**[Test build #63682 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63682/consoleFull)**
for PR 14596 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14616
**[Test build #63670 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63670/consoleFull)**
for PR 14616 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14618
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63676/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14244
merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14616
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63670/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14616
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14596
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14244
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14596
Great, that's all the occurrences, and I like that you added use of the
SPARK_GITHUB_URL property.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14593
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14574
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14618
**[Test build #63676 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63676/consoleFull)**
for PR 14618 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14618#discussion_r74552290
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -1,494 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
**[Test build #63675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63675/consoleFull)**
for PR 14559 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13893
@cloud-fan I've send a PR to add `Scanner` operator in #14619 , please have
a look at it when you have time, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14616#discussion_r74556830
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2223,3 +2223,29 @@ object TimeWindowing extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14618#discussion_r74550719
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -1,494 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229
**[Test build #63661 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63661/consoleFull)**
for PR 14229 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63663/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63658/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14618
**[Test build #63672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63672/consoleFull)**
for PR 14618 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14615#discussion_r74547698
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -155,13 +155,13 @@ class JsonFileFormat extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14615#discussion_r7454
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2494,16 +2494,18 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* @since 2.0.0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14571
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #63658 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63658/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14616
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63655/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
**[Test build #63662 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63662/consoleFull)**
for PR 14559 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
**[Test build #63663 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63663/consoleFull)**
for PR 14182 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559#discussion_r74542181
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCOptions.scala
---
@@ -20,14 +20,21 @@ package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63661/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74542484
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/LDAWrapper.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14609
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
@gatorsmile Your second query example have two different CTE subqueries.
And no one is reused in the query plan. So we will not see CommonSubquery. The
optimized plan of this query looks like:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
**[Test build #63657 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63657/consoleFull)**
for PR 14617 at commit
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14599
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397
Hi, @hvanhovell .
Could you review this again? After the last time you've seen, only the
testcase is moved into a new testsuite.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14608
adding a space LGTM. I think `UnaryMinus` is the only special case? Adding
parentheses at the outside of each expression should work for all other cases.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
thanks,merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
I think this is duplicate to the merged one #14548?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14599
closing in favor of #14608
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14609
**[Test build #63650 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63650/consoleFull)**
for PR 14609 at commit
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r74537542
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,159 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
**[Test build #63653 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63653/consoleFull)**
for PR 13409 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558
**[Test build #63654 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63654/consoleFull)**
for PR 14558 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14571
Hi, @rxin . The target suite will be `WindowQuerySuite`, I'll move all and
remove that testsuite.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
I haven't had a chance to look at the PR, but the function name
`isoreg`seems in line with
https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/stats/html/isoreg.html -- So I'd
say `spark.isoreg` sounds
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14561
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
**[Test build #63653 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63653/consoleFull)**
for PR 13409 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63653/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74517417
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,109 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
@viirya Are we driving the execution of the CommonSubquery while compiling
the main query ? For example, if we are explaining the query, we should not be
executing the CommonSubquery, right ?
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746
Hi @vanzin, have any more comments on this? Do you think it can be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14605
Argh. I really dislike `askWithRetry`. This is just another reason why.
LGTM, since this maintains the current behavior.
Merging to master / 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14610
Yes, I wrote that. It's what the test is testing, that they return the same
value. I get it, we know the implementation right now is definitely going to
pass that test always. And I don't see any
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74517443
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,109 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11746
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63651/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14608
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14610
**[Test build #63640 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63640/consoleFull)**
for PR 14610 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r74517366
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,6 +376,109 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14608
**[Test build #63634 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63634/consoleFull)**
for PR 14608 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14610
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14607
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63633/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user keypointt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14610
[SPARK-17026][MLlib][Tests] remove identical values substraction
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17026
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I'm not
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397#discussion_r74504911
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/with.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+create temporary view t as select * from values 0, 1, 2 as
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14551
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14586
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14397#discussion_r74503932
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/with.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+create temporary view t as select * from values 0, 1, 2 as t(id);
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
**[Test build #63618 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63618/consoleFull)**
for PR 13146 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14598
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14616
Can we just add a check in `ResolveAggregateFunctions`? If `groupByOrdinal`
is enabled and aggregate expressions contains integral literals, we skip it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14609
**[Test build #63638 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63638/consoleFull)**
for PR 14609 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14551
**[Test build #63630 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63630/consoleFull)**
for PR 14551 at commit
GitHub user petermaxlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14608
[SPARK-17013][SQL] Parse negative numeric literals
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch updates the SQL parser to parse negative numeric literals as
numeric
GitHub user keypointt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14609
[MINOR][Core] fix warnings on depreciated methods in
MesosClusterSchedulerSuite and DiskBlockObjectWriterSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed warnings below
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14598#discussion_r74506995
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/literals.sql.out ---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+-- Automatically generated by SQLQueryTestSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447#discussion_r74530185
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/MultilayerPerceptronClassifierExample.scala
---
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14586
**[Test build #3221 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3221/consoleFull)**
for PR 14586 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14598
**[Test build #63625 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63625/consoleFull)**
for PR 14598 at commit
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14522#discussion_r74536151
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2121,7 +2121,7 @@ setMethod("arrange",
})
#' @rdname arrange
-#' @name orderBy
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14586
**[Test build #63629 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63629/consoleFull)**
for PR 14586 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
**[Test build #63667 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63667/consoleFull)**
for PR 14559 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #63673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63673/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14571
**[Test build #63660 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63660/consoleFull)**
for PR 14571 at commit
401 - 500 of 561 matches
Mail list logo
