Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15292
LGTM except 2 minor comments, thanks for working on it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #66595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66595/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11211
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11211
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66590/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mateiz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8318
Cool, good to know that there's another ASF project that does it. We should
go for it then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11211
**[Test build #66590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66590/consoleFull)**
for PR 11211 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15292#discussion_r82515285
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -229,13 +229,9 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user jpiper closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14861
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jpiper commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14861
Looks like this was actually added in #15140, so we can close this :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15159
@holdenk that's correct.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15159
**[Test build #66594 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66594/consoleFull)**
for PR 15159 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15218
@zhzhan I am curious why this is the case for the jobs being mentioned.
This pr should have an impact if the locality preference of the taskset
being run is fairly suboptimal to begin with, no ?
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14215
@wgtmac I hope this one is merged into 2.1 but I believe I am not supposed
to decide it. I will anyway take out of the vectorized one described in the PR
then.
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14861
**[Test build #66593 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66593/consoleFull)**
for PR 14861 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13493
PR is updated, @holdenk @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13493
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13493
**[Test build #66589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66589/consoleFull)**
for PR 13493 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13493
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66589/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
**[Test build #66592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66592/consoleFull)**
for PR 10307 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66592/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
**[Test build #66592 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66592/consoleFull)**
for PR 10307 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66591/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
**[Test build #66591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66591/consoleFull)**
for PR 10307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
**[Test build #66591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66591/consoleFull)**
for PR 10307 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15389
Maybe @hyukjinkwon could also do a review pass while we wait for @davies or
someone with commit privileges to come by and do a final review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15404
Can you close this pull request? If it's an attempt at backporting you can
just make a new PR once you get it sorted out.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650
WIP
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11211
**[Test build #66590 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66590/consoleFull)**
for PR 11211 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11211
Conflicts is resolved.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13493
**[Test build #66589 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66589/consoleFull)**
for PR 13493 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Awesome, thanks for updating. I'm at PyData this weekend so will be a bit
slow on my end.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
@vanzin @holdenk @BryanCutler PR is updated, please help review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15399
Hi, @gatorsmile .
Could you review this PR when you have sometime?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66588/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #66588 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66588/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
Github user praveendareddy21 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14375
@MechCoder
can you review and merge this PR?
refer https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248 for discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #66588 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66588/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #66587 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66587/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66587/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #66587 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66587/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82513101
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512794
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82513082
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/DecisionTreeRegressorWrapper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512650
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -791,4 +791,59 @@ test_that("spark.kstest", {
expect_match(capture.output(stats)[1],
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512708
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15334
Saw @viirya submitted a PR for the same issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7793
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512809
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512689
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512723
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512914
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512937
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512799
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512787
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512727
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512770
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82513063
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/DecisionTreeClassifierWrapper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690#discussion_r82512912
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1427,3 +1447,185 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
cat(summaryStr, "\n")
invisible(x)
}
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r82512997
--- Diff: python/pyspark/conf.py ---
@@ -101,13 +101,25 @@ def __init__(self, loadDefaults=True, _jvm=None,
_jconf=None):
self._jconf =
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r82512981
--- Diff: python/pyspark/conf.py ---
@@ -118,28 +130,28 @@ def setIfMissing(self, key, value):
def setMaster(self, value):
"""Set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15404
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user yintengfei opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15404
Branch 2.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r82512714
--- Diff: python/pyspark/conf.py ---
@@ -149,35 +161,53 @@ def setAll(self, pairs):
:param pairs: list of key-value pairs to set
"""
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15360
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66586/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15360
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15360
**[Test build #66586 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66586/consoleFull)**
for PR 15360 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287
+1 for closing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287
This has been stale for a while, we should close this if there is no update
here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933
@hellertime Are you able to rebase?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13077
@devaraj-kavali Are you still able to update this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
@drcrallen Are you still planning to update this? It's quite a useful
feature, so hoping this can get in. Also since Fine grain mode is depcreated I
don't think we need to update it too.
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15334
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15334
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66585/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15334
**[Test build #66585 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66585/consoleFull)**
for PR 15334 at commit
Github user bkpathak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12691
Hi @holdenk I am still interested in working on this but it looks like I
pull and merged with a master branch instead of rebasing it. Can I close it and
open another pull request. Or how should I
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
@hvanhovell, after my investigations, I have added code to generate
`UnsafeArrayData' at two code paths. Could you please review this again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
GitHub user bkpathak reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12691
[Spark-14761][SQL][WIP] Reject invalid join methods when join columns are
not specified in PySpark DataFrame join.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PySpark, the
Github user bkpathak closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12691
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bkpathak closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12691
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user bkpathak reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12691
[Spark-14761][SQL][WIP] Reject invalid join methods when join columns are
not specified in PySpark DataFrame join.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PySpark, the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15360
**[Test build #66586 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66586/consoleFull)**
for PR 15360 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15360
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15371
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15371
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66584/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15371
**[Test build #66584 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66584/consoleFull)**
for PR 15371 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15334
**[Test build #66585 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66585/consoleFull)**
for PR 15334 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12578
I'm going to move the discussions over to JIRA.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15371
**[Test build #66584 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66584/consoleFull)**
for PR 15371 at commit
Github user seyfe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15371#discussion_r82509108
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/TaskMetrics.scala
---
@@ -326,36 +324,13 @@ private[spark] object TaskMetrics extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66583/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
**[Test build #66583 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66583/consoleFull)**
for PR 15044 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9
@MLnick I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Where are we
discarding cluster centers?
Maybe we should say that the `initialModel` always takes precedence over
`k`. So we can just
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66582/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
**[Test build #66582 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66582/consoleFull)**
for PR 15044 at commit
Github user paberline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8384
Hi @holdenk - thanks for taking the time to look at this. I understand this
PR
might be too esoteric for Spark core. I will close it once @mengxr
@jkbradley and @davies confirm.
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
