Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590
Can you change the tile to "JVM object" rather than "Java object"?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
@srowen @tgravescs any chance you'd be able to take a look at this before
spark summit?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590
**[Test build #67356 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67356/consoleFull)**
for PR 15590 at commit
[`c8ec18b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15504
**[Test build #3369 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3369/consoleFull)**
for PR 15504 at commit
[`c188461`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590
[SPARK-17949][SQL] A Java object based aggregate operator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a new hash-based aggregate operator named
`ObjectHashAggregateE
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15504
**[Test build #3368 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3368/consoleFull)**
for PR 15504 at commit
[`c188461`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user zsxwing closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15454
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15454
Since I have not yet heard complaints about this for 1.6, and this one may
break some user's job, I'm going to close it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553#discussion_r84549552
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -337,17 +343,27 @@ class StreamExecution(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67355 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67355/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`de6c00d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67354/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67354 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67354/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`4294510`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user olarayej commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
@felixcheung @falaki I have addressed all your comments. Shall we merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67351/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67354 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67354/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`4294510`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
**[Test build #67351 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67351/consoleFull)**
for PR 11336 at commit
[`1338d71`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67353/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67353 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67353/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`390c2db`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67352/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
**[Test build #67352 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67352/consoleFull)**
for PR 15589 at commit
[`585b55b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15504
**[Test build #3368 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3368/consoleFull)**
for PR 15504 at commit
[`c188461`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67353 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67353/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`390c2db`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
**[Test build #67352 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67352/consoleFull)**
for PR 15589 at commit
[`585b55b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
[SPARKR][branch-2.0] R merge API doc and example fix
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes for R doc
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
You can mer
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15463
Hah - I wish I had that much insight into Jenkins. I just think it was just
flaky esp. given the github DNS issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
**[Test build #67351 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67351/consoleFull)**
for PR 11336 at commit
[`1338d71`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15476
Thanks very much @yhuai !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15463
Whoa! Jenkins disrespects @kayousterhout -- bad Jenkins! Or did you
actually fix something @shivaram ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
**[Test build #67350 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67350/consoleFull)**
for PR 14553 at commit
[`47eee52`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15463
**[Test build #67349 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67349/consoleFull)**
for PR 15463 at commit
[`cd6d240`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67348/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
**[Test build #67348 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67348/consoleFull)**
for PR 11336 at commit
[`ed1b382`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15463
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67347/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
**[Test build #67348 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67348/consoleFull)**
for PR 11336 at commit
[`ed1b382`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67347 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67347/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`f40e72f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553#discussion_r84539662
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -336,17 +342,27 @@ class StreamExecution(
}
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15410
I would say just not displaying it would be fine, so making the `else if`
an `if`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67347 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67347/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`f40e72f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15580
**[Test build #67344 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67344/consoleFull)**
for PR 15580 at commit
[`d3ddaf7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
**[Test build #67345 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67345/consoleFull)**
for PR 15553 at commit
[`ec49e8b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
**[Test build #67346 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67346/consoleFull)**
for PR 15539 at commit
[`2a96537`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553#discussion_r84538526
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -336,17 +342,27 @@ class StreamExecution(
}
Github user frreiss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
I've been running tests since this morning; should have updates in soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10881
@1236897 Just try `git checkpick` this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15580#discussion_r84537308
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/OutputWriter.scala
---
@@ -77,19 +77,22 @@ abstract class OutputWriterFactory ext
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
@frreiss could you update the PR? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15476
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
> The biggest problem of this proposal is, invalidating the cache may be
slow if there are a lot of cache entries.
I don't think this is really an issue. Conservatively assuming ~1us per
evic
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15476
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15584
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553#discussion_r84533967
--- Diff: sql/hive-thriftserver/pom.xml ---
@@ -41,11 +41,8 @@
${project.version}
- org.apache.spark
- spark-
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15516
I think you've committed a jar file by accident
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
hi - where are we on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
Changes done, please do let me know of any other comments, thanks !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15586
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
merged to master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575
@rxin : Yes. There was a comment over there [0] but based on code it does
not look like its moving rows across input partitions (cc @chenghao-intel who
added that).
[0] :
https://githu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
merged to master, thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15576
merged to master, thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15576
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575
ExpandExec should follow child's output partitioning and ordering,
shouldn't it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user shearerp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
SPARK-14241 doesn't just occur with union and coalesce, it also occurs with
filter and probably other operations. Hopefully this PR will address all of
those situations. I strongly agree with the e
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15580
cc @HyukjinKwon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15571
I've also merged this into `branch-2.0` (2.0.2)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user nchammas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
@mengxr - I think this PR will also address
[SPARK-14241](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14241).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15571
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15580#discussion_r84522329
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetOutputWriter.scala
---
@@ -140,16 +143,17 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15587
It should be the implementation to mark them as serializable, shouldn't it?
Maybe we should document it properly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
Actually can we move these tests into a query file test?
In sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests
and check SQLQueryTestSuite
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84426029
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/NormalEquationSolver.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84437865
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -44,35 +46,52 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquaresModel(
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84433100
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/NormalEquationSolver.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84438222
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -44,35 +46,52 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquaresModel(
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84512313
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -85,73 +104,198 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84433034
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/NormalEquationSolver.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15516
**[Test build #67342 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67342/consoleFull)**
for PR 15516 at commit
[`bedc93f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15588
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user Astralidea opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15588
[SPARK-18039][Scheduler] fix bug maxRegisteredWaitingTime does not work
The synchronous mode of driver and executor is through dummy job is only
ensure 1 executor connect to driver.
In my cl
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15483
It would be good to post on the design / interfaces before you get too far.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15463
Thanks @kayousterhout for support but I think problem still continues. Is
there any contact to get support?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
Ping.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539#discussion_r84508947
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/TableFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -42,24 +43,21 @@ class TableFileCatalog(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15586
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67339/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15586
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15586
**[Test build #67339 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67339/consoleFull)**
for PR 15586 at commit
[`4ea0539`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15587
[SPARK-18051][Spark Core] fix bug of custom PartitionCoalescer causing
serialization exception
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
mark `PartitionCoalescer` and `Parti
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15587
**[Test build #67341 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67341/consoleFull)**
for PR 15587 at commit
[`2d88eaa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15463
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15463
I think Jenkins can not be triggered ;) Is there any other way to trigger?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
201 - 300 of 402 matches
Mail list logo