Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15626
**[Test build #67605 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67605/consoleFull)**
for PR 15626 at commit
[`3cf14fa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user tcondie commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15626
@koeninger Thanks for pointing this out. I have revised to serialization
procedure to use org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.JsonUtils
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67604/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`9a6fff6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15471
**[Test build #67602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67602/consoleFull)**
for PR 15471 at commit
[`666b609`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
**[Test build #67603 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67603/consoleFull)**
for PR 14553 at commit
[`0a56e4a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15471
@shivaram sorry for delay getting back to this. Please take another look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15471#discussion_r85230441
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/RBackendHandler.scala
---
@@ -83,7 +86,29 @@ private[r] class RBackendHandler(server: RBackend)
Github user frreiss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
Updated the branch and addressed new review comments. Looks like my last
push missed a one-line change to memory.scala. Tests are running now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15471#discussion_r85229665
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/RBackend.scala ---
@@ -110,6 +115,11 @@ private[spark] object RBackend extends Logging {
val bo
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15624
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15633
**[Test build #67601 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67601/consoleFull)**
for PR 15633 at commit
[`6f8a3a0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15612
@rxin I am not sure I like this better than previous version.
We have traded an RDD reference for a boolean, and enforced constrain that
the 'major' RDD must be the first to get zipped against (a
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15624
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15639
Can you create a JIRA ticket and add it to the title?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15634
FileLister? FileListing?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
cc @srinathshankar
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553#discussion_r85227714
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/memory.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +126,23 @@ case class MemoryStream[A : Encoder](id: In
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553#discussion_r85227658
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/memory.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +126,23 @@ case class MemoryStream[A : Encoder](id: In
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15612#discussion_r85227464
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ZippedPartitionsRDD.scala ---
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ private[spark] class ZippedPartitionsPartition(
priva
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15633
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67595/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15633
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15633
**[Test build #67595 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67595/consoleFull)**
for PR 15633 at commit
[`01e73bb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67594/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67594/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`012c124`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67597/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
**[Test build #67597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67597/consoleFull)**
for PR 15647 at commit
[`77f05ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67599/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
@jkbradley No problems at all, it's always better to have more reviewers.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
**[Test build #67599 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67599/consoleFull)**
for PR 15647 at commit
[`77f05ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15642
Please update the PR description.
LGTM. cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
@cloud-fan Could you take a look at this? The code changes look good to me.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Could you take another pass at changes? especially the argument types. I
think this PR still has many related issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85220068
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1141,6 +1174,21 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionTraini
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85220020
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -777,6 +787,20 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85218915
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -777,6 +787,20 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85220866
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1390,7 +1505,8 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionSummary
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85220059
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -919,6 +948,10 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85218235
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -721,7 +730,8 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[s
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85218200
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -698,7 +706,8 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[s
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85219325
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -777,6 +787,20 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85218415
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -777,6 +787,20 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85220713
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1243,6 +1291,73 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionSummar
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85218947
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -777,6 +787,20 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85220564
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1243,6 +1291,73 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionSummar
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85220449
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1243,6 +1291,73 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionSummar
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r85220375
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1243,6 +1291,73 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionSummar
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r85221940
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -251,7 +259,12 @@ case class InSet(child: Express
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15627
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67600/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15627
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15627
**[Test build #67600 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67600/consoleFull)**
for PR 15627 at commit
[`a3eb6d4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
@jkbradley Thanks for your input. I'm happy to review this, but wanted to
get clarification before proceeding. I can take a look in the next couple of
days.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15626
So it looks like this is the json format being used for kafka offsets:
[{"_1":{"hash":0,"partition":0,"topic":"t"},"_2":2},{"_1":{"hash":0,"partition":1,"topic":"t"},"_2":2}]
My m
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r85217860
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -435,8 +458,15 @@ case class EqualTo(left: Expres
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
@sethah Thanks for pinging, and for bringing up those old design
discussions (which are still the best options I know of). @WeichenXu123 sorry
I've been slow to respond; I'm trying to keep up!
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r85217483
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -55,8 +55,20 @@ abstract class RDG extends
Github user zsxwing closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15646
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15627
**[Test build #67600 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67600/consoleFull)**
for PR 15627 at commit
[`a3eb6d4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15640
**[Test build #67598 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67598/consoleFull)**
for PR 15640 at commit
[`ec0516b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
GitHub user skambha opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15649
[SPARK-18121][SQL] Unable to query global temp views when hive support is
enabled
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Issue:
Querying on a global temp view throws Tabl
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
**[Test build #67599 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67599/consoleFull)**
for PR 15647 at commit
[`77f05ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r85214549
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -77,9 +89,21 @@ case class Rand(seed: Long
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12195
thank you @jkbradley for the detailed explanation :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12195
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15640#discussion_r85213183
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -220,4 +220,12 @@ class SparkSqlParserSuite extends
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12195
LGTM
merging with master
Thanks @keypointt !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
**[Test build #67597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67597/consoleFull)**
for PR 15647 at commit
[`77f05ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
**[Test build #67596 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67596/consoleFull)**
for PR 15647 at commit
[`77f05ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15516
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67596/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15516
merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
**[Test build #67596 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67596/consoleFull)**
for PR 15647 at commit
[`77f05ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15640#discussion_r85212670
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -220,4 +220,13 @@ class SparkSqlParserSuite extends
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15646
Merging to 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Thanks for the update! On a last glance through, I spotted a few things to
fix up. Since some had to do with wording, I thought it'd be easier just to
send a PR to your PR. Can you please revie
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r85209471
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -657,10 +777,22 @@ case class StringLPad(s
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
**[Test build #67592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67592/consoleFull)**
for PR 15644 at commit
[`46aae86`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15646
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15646
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67591/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15646
**[Test build #67591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67591/consoleFull)**
for PR 15646 at commit
[`eba011a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15633
**[Test build #67595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67595/consoleFull)**
for PR 15633 at commit
[`01e73bb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67594 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67594/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`012c124`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15631
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67589/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15631
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15631
**[Test build #67589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67589/consoleFull)**
for PR 15631 at commit
[`9fc3537`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15648
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15638#discussion_r85201732
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/regression.py ---
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ def featureImportances(self):
@inherit_doc
class RandomForestRegressor(JavaEst
GitHub user ashangit opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15648
[SPARK-18119][SPARK-CORE] Namenode safemode check is only performed on one
namenode which can stuck the startup of SparkHistory server
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67593/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
**[Test build #67593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67593/consoleFull)**
for PR 15647 at commit
[`1ead234`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srinathshankar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15640#discussion_r85200011
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -220,4 +220,13 @@ class SparkSqlParserSuite extends
Github user srinathshankar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15640#discussion_r85199895
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -220,4 +220,12 @@ class SparkSqlParserSuite extends
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15640
Hi, @hvanhovell .
Could you review this PR when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
201 - 300 of 543 matches
Mail list logo
