Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86289128
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,56 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86288958
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -226,6 +227,79 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86288781
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -204,6 +207,40 @@ class AstBuilder extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68044/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662
**[Test build #68044 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68044/consoleFull)**
for PR 15662 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628
What are you going to add? `compressed` already exists on vectors...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15747
**[Test build #68050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68050/consoleFull)**
for PR 15747 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15747
[SPARK-14393][SQL][DOC] update doc for python and R
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
minor doc update that should go to master & branch-2.1
## How was this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68043/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86287258
--- Diff: python/pyspark/find_spark_home.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+#!/usr/bin/python
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86287252
--- Diff: python/pyspark/find_spark_home.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+#!/usr/bin/python
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745
**[Test build #68043 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68043/consoleFull)**
for PR 15745 at commit
Github user adrian-wang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15011
Thanks for your kind review @cloud-fan @gatorsmile , this helps our
enabling for BigBench on Spark 2.x
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746#discussion_r86286402
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1703,9 +1723,9 @@ print.summary.KSTest <- function(x, ...) {
setMethod("spark.randomForest", signature(data =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746
**[Test build #68049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68049/consoleFull)**
for PR 15746 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746#discussion_r86286287
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/regression.py ---
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ def featureImportances(self):
@inherit_doc
class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86286268
--- Diff: dev/run-pip-tests-2 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86286233
--- Diff: dev/run-pip-tests-2 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15746
[SPARK-18239][SPARKR] Gradient Boosted Tree for R
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Gradient Boosted Tree for R
Since this is relatively isolated I'd like to have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68041/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
**[Test build #68041 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68041/consoleFull)**
for PR 15743 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86285663
--- Diff: dev/run-pip-tests-2 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #68048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68048/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Thank you so much, @viirya . I added the testcase and fixed related bug
again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15538
@rxin One of our weekly Spark jobs is choking, and fixing it could take the
rest of the week. I suggest someone else take the lead on the Parquet 1.9
upgrade if they can devote their time to it.
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86285288
--- Diff: dev/run-pip-tests-2 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #68047 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68047/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741
**[Test build #68046 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68046/consoleFull)**
for PR 15741 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741
The only failure seems to be irrelevant.
```
[info] BasicSchedulerIntegrationSuite:
[info] - job with fetch failure *** FAILED *** (1 second, 889 milliseconds)
[info]
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662
This sounds a right and critical fix to me; otherwise we are unable to
resolve the columns of predicates in the case sensitive JDBC sources.
@sureshthalamati Could you post the
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15011
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662#discussion_r86284309
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -790,4 +807,23 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
val
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r86284252
--- Diff: dev/run-pip-tests-2 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662#discussion_r86284284
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -790,4 +807,23 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
val
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662#discussion_r86284204
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -23,9 +23,11 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15691
Merging to master and 2.1! Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15691
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Merging to master and 2.1! Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
@rxin: That makes sense then. The final change in SPARK-18129 will involve
some additional changes to the build process. People who are officially allowed
to make releases will need to register on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68040/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741
**[Test build #68040 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68040/consoleFull)**
for PR 15741 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
**[Test build #68045 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68045/consoleFull)**
for PR 15523 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523#discussion_r86282864
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -89,7 +89,14 @@ case class FilterExec(condition:
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662
Thank you very much for the feed back @gatorsmile . Addressed the review
comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662
**[Test build #68044 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68044/consoleFull)**
for PR 15662 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
LGTM except one comment for the test.
cc @hvanhovell for second look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523#discussion_r86282324
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -89,7 +89,14 @@ case class FilterExec(condition:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86282010
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -226,6 +227,63 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68028 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68028/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68028/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745
**[Test build #68043 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68043/consoleFull)**
for PR 15745 at commit
Github user snodawn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15726
@viirya I test both inserting overwrite a new partition and a existing
partition. Of cause, inserting overwrite a new partition runs faster.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15691
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68039/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745
**[Test build #68042 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68042/consoleFull)**
for PR 15745 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68042/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15691
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68034/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
**[Test build #68039 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68039/consoleFull)**
for PR 15671 at commit
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745
[SPARK-18207][SQL] Fix a compilation error due to HashExpression.doGenCode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR avoids a compilation error due to more than 64KB Java
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745
**[Test build #68042 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68042/consoleFull)**
for PR 15745 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15745
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15691
**[Test build #68034 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68034/consoleFull)**
for PR 15691 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15726
@ericl Thanks. Looks like we have more than one level lock (at least two in
`HiveExternalCatalog`, `HiveClientImpl`). This might hard to tackle.
Although it is still possibly to have a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15744
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user ClassNotFoundExp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15744
hive.exec.stagingdir have no effect
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68037/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
**[Test build #68037 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68037/consoleFull)**
for PR 15725 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
**[Test build #68041 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68041/consoleFull)**
for PR 15743 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68029/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
**[Test build #68029 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68029/consoleFull)**
for PR 15702 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677#issuecomment-258050659 was on
the past commit. I resolved the conflicts twice.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68027/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
**[Test build #68027 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68027/consoleFull)**
for PR 15677 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68033/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68018/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #68018 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68018/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15742
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
**[Test build #68033 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68033/consoleFull)**
for PR 15677 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15742
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68036/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15742
**[Test build #68036 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68036/consoleFull)**
for PR 15742 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68031/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15741
**[Test build #68040 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68040/consoleFull)**
for PR 15741 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
**[Test build #68031 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68031/consoleFull)**
for PR 15677 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
@sethah I agree that manually listing traceable params is prone to mistake.
I think we can log all params expect some params which are labeled `dont-log`
in the individual algorithms. Or we
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68038/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 699 matches
Mail list logo
