Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061#discussion_r90287638
--- Diff: kubernetes/README.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# Pre-requisites
+* maven, JDK and all other pre-requisites for building Spark.
+
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
**[Test build #69416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69416/consoleFull)**
for PR 16082 at commit
[`ab51ae3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16060
Merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009#discussion_r90287240
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1188,7 +1188,9 @@ categorical features. The number of bins is set by
the `numBuckets` parameter. I
that the number
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
I built and tested this branch, and it resolves the issue I was having with
reading Spark 2.1 tables in earlier versions of Spark. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
I think the comment on `#mergeSpillsWithFileStreams` needs to be updated
slightly to include encryption, but other than that lgtm.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
**[Test build #69415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69415/consoleFull)**
for PR 16082 at commit
[`9735e20`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080#discussion_r90286503
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -232,17 +233,26 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(conf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16070
**[Test build #69414 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69414/consoleFull)**
for PR 16070 at commit
[`776269f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16070
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15910
**[Test build #69413 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69413/consoleFull)**
for PR 15910 at commit
[`b1f7b23`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69410/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
**[Test build #69410 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69410/consoleFull)**
for PR 16079 at commit
[`9f67fd8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
**[Test build #69412 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69412/consoleFull)**
for PR 16082 at commit
[`43019db`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
GitHub user lins05 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
[SPARK-18652] Include the data in pyspark package.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since we already include the python examples in the pyspark package, we
should include
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16031#discussion_r90277233
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/historypage.js
---
@@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ jQuery.extend( jQuery.fn.dataTableExt.oSort, {
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16077
install.spark() checks if SPARK_HOME is set or the Spark Jar can be found
in the cache location.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69409/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
**[Test build #69409 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69409/consoleFull)**
for PR 15620 at commit
[`fd0ab34`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
**[Test build #69408 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69408/consoleFull)**
for PR 16079 at commit
[`563645f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user a-roberts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15736
Passed on your question to our JIT developers
> The sense* of the test can have an impact of the VM interpreter
performance, but that is not usually much of a component of actual throughpu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
**[Test build #69411 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69411/consoleFull)**
for PR 15979 at commit
[`876e5c7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69408/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079#discussion_r90250928
--- Diff: sbin/spark-daemon.sh ---
@@ -176,11 +175,11 @@ run_command() {
case "$mode" in
(class)
- execute_command nice -n "$SP
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
**[Test build #69410 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69410/consoleFull)**
for PR 16079 at commit
[`9f67fd8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057#discussion_r90250288
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -714,6 +714,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079#discussion_r90247203
--- Diff: sbin/spark-daemon.sh ---
@@ -124,9 +124,8 @@ if [ "$SPARK_NICENESS" = "" ]; then
fi
execute_command() {
- local command="$@"
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079#discussion_r90244270
--- Diff: sbin/spark-daemon.sh ---
@@ -124,9 +124,8 @@ if [ "$SPARK_NICENESS" = "" ]; then
fi
execute_command() {
- local command="$@"
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16077
Is this means that it will install spark package each time when starting a
new session in interactive mode? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057#discussion_r90243317
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -714,6 +714,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057#discussion_r90243278
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -714,6 +714,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15991
since its just in the history server and pretty isolated seems ok. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057#discussion_r90240521
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -714,6 +714,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
**[Test build #69409 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69409/consoleFull)**
for PR 15620 at commit
[`fd0ab34`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15910#discussion_r90215100
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -769,11 +768,11 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"KMeansModel"),
#' # multinomial logistic regression
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15736
Hm why does the order matter - maybe helps branch prediction? I doubt we
even know how the bytecode orders this let alone how it is JITted and whether
it will gather branching info on this one branch
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620#discussion_r90233749
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -64,19 +64,72 @@ case class If(pr
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90232704
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -590,7 +591,12 @@ object ScalaReflection extends ScalaReflec
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90231949
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -590,7 +591,11 @@ object ScalaReflection extends ScalaReflec
Github user a-roberts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15736
I see, so doing the != comparison first which is likely to be true more of
the time so we're not consistently failing this check then entering the else
```
def getComparator[K](keyCo
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620#discussion_r90231018
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -64,19 +64,72 @@ case class If(predicate:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69406/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
**[Test build #69408 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69408/consoleFull)**
for PR 16079 at commit
[`563645f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620#discussion_r90230044
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -64,19 +64,72 @@ case class If(predicate:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
**[Test build #69406 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69406/consoleFull)**
for PR 16080 at commit
[`89f1625`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user manishatGit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
@srowen I scanned this page and Spark programming guide for other Java code
examples, apart from Self-Contained Application on Quick-start-guide page,
other code examples have no such problems.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69404/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
**[Test build #69404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69404/consoleFull)**
for PR 16079 at commit
[`563645f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057#discussion_r90224278
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -714,6 +714,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69407/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
**[Test build #69407 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69407/consoleFull)**
for PR 16081 at commit
[`6b01304`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15736
(Particularly) as the number of partitions increase, "if (a._1 != b._1)"
might be better for bpt reasons.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69405/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
**[Test build #69405 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69405/consoleFull)**
for PR 11974 at commit
[`83b5b8e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079#discussion_r90221737
--- Diff: sbin/spark-daemon.sh ---
@@ -176,11 +175,11 @@ run_command() {
case "$mode" in
(class)
- execute_command nice -n "$SPA
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079#discussion_r90221689
--- Diff: sbin/spark-daemon.sh ---
@@ -124,9 +124,8 @@ if [ "$SPARK_NICENESS" = "" ]; then
fi
execute_command() {
- local command="$@"
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
**[Test build #69407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69407/consoleFull)**
for PR 16081 at commit
[`6b01304`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user manishatGit opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
[SPARK][EXAMPLE] Added missing semicolon in quick-start-guide example
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added missing semicolon in quick-start-guide java example code
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69403/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
**[Test build #69403 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69403/consoleFull)**
for PR 15979 at commit
[`70dd650`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057#discussion_r90219716
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -714,6 +714,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057#discussion_r90219640
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -714,6 +714,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15958
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067
thanks, merging to master/2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
**[Test build #69406 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69406/consoleFull)**
for PR 16080 at commit
[`89f1625`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
cc @rxin @yhuai @mallman
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
[SPARK-18647][SQL] do not put provider in table properties for Hive serde
table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark 2.1, we make Hive serde tables case-preservin
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16076
cc @jkbradley @MLnick @sethah
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
**[Test build #69405 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69405/consoleFull)**
for PR 11974 at commit
[`83b5b8e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
@MLnick I have to add a transtyping denseGrad in the expression returned by
seqOp from DenseVector to Vector. The only way I could find to do it with the
API are: `Vectors.fromBreeze(denseGra
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69401/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
**[Test build #69401 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69401/consoleFull)**
for PR 12896 at commit
[`a439899`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
Hi, @hvanhovell .
Could you review this PR? This PR now is the new fix + the reverted commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620#discussion_r90211997
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CodeGenerationSuite.scala
---
@@ -97,6 +97,38 @@ class CodeGeneration
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15958
LGTM. Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620#discussion_r90211519
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -64,19 +64,72 @@ case class If(pr
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620#discussion_r90211285
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -64,19 +64,72 @@ case class If(pr
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620#discussion_r90211169
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -64,19 +64,72 @@ case class If(pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69396/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
Hello @MLnick,
Sorry that my push of a new version just crossed with your suggestion.
I'll test you suggestion. Thanks to for having written it, I didn't get
that Sean's hint
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067
**[Test build #69396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69396/consoleFull)**
for PR 16067 at commit
[`54c0dd1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
**[Test build #69402 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69402/consoleFull)**
for PR 11974 at commit
[`c27f128`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69402/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15958
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69395/
Test PASSed.
---
401 - 500 of 601 matches
Mail list logo
