Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
**[Test build #69764 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69764/consoleFull)**
for PR 16183 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16180
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69770/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16180
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16180
**[Test build #69770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69770/consoleFull)**
for PR 16180 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69763/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
**[Test build #69763 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69763/consoleFull)**
for PR 16183 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69768/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #69768 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69768/consoleFull)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
**[Test build #69771 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69771/consoleFull)**
for PR 16182 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
overall LGTM, just a few nits that would be good to fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16180
**[Test build #69770 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69770/consoleFull)**
for PR 16180 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16186
**[Test build #69769 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69769/consoleFull)**
for PR 16186 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16186#discussion_r91222579
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/memory.scala
---
@@ -70,11 +70,11 @@ case class MemoryStream[A : Encoder](id: Int,
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16186#discussion_r91222596
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamTest.scala ---
@@ -319,7 +319,6 @@ trait StreamTest extends QueryTest with
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16186#discussion_r91222589
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamTest.scala ---
@@ -231,8 +231,8 @@ trait StreamTest extends QueryTest with
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16186
[SPARK-18758][SS] StreamingQueryListener events from a StreamingQuery
should be sent only to the listeners in the same session as the query
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69761/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16165#discussion_r91222047
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
**[Test build #69761 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69761/consoleFull)**
for PR 16182 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16115
cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell too
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user seyfe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16165#discussion_r91221947
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #69768 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69768/consoleFull)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16165#discussion_r91221480
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
LGTM pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69765 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69765/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69765/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
@rxin @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16179
Hmm, those tests passed locally... let me rebase.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16177
cc @cloud-fan / @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69766/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139
**[Test build #69766 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69766/consoleFull)**
for PR 16139 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16175#discussion_r91219886
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -1110,6 +1110,14 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16185
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16185
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16185
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user c-sahuja opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16185
Update Spark documentation to provide information on how to create External
Table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Although, currently, the saveAsTable does not provide an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16184
**[Test build #69767 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69767/consoleFull)**
for PR 16184 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16184
cc @liancheng and @zsxwing. Could you take a look and see if it makes sense
please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16184
[SPARK-18753][SQL] Keep pushed-down null literal as a filter in Spark-side
post-filter for FileFormat datasources
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139
**[Test build #69766 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69766/consoleFull)**
for PR 16139 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139#discussion_r91218016
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -59,17 +59,22 @@ Given $n$ weighted observations $(w_i, a_i, b_i)$:
The number of features for each
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16165#discussion_r91218008
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139#discussion_r91217902
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -59,17 +59,22 @@ Given $n$ weighted observations $(w_i, a_i, b_i)$:
The number of features for each
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000
I disagree. It's completely possible to mount the streaming API on top of
the existing spark-core API. You just need to add the necessary hooks so that
the API code can ask the streaming module for
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16139#discussion_r91217895
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -59,17 +59,22 @@ Given $n$ weighted observations $(w_i, a_i, b_i)$:
The number of features for each
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69756/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
**[Test build #69756 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69756/consoleFull)**
for PR 16092 at commit
Github user ChorPangChan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000
@vanzin
I undertstand the story now, but im afraid i cant help to accomplish that
story.
as my first comment state,
this implementation is base on the current REST
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69765 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69765/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
@lichenglin Another PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16134 is trying
to delete the staging directory and the temporary data files (which is pretty
big in your case) after each insert.
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
@mallman OK, thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69752/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
**[Test build #69752 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69752/consoleFull)**
for PR 16109 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16179
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16179
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69757/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16179
**[Test build #69757 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69757/consoleFull)**
for PR 16179 at commit
Github user jiexiong commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
@hvanhovell, thanks for your suggestion. I will change the PR description
as suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69762/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69762 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69762/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16178
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69751/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16178
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
**[Test build #69764 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69764/consoleFull)**
for PR 16183 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16173
It existed to support several _internal_ implementations, of which there is
only one now. I don't know that it was ever intended for external
implementations.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16178
**[Test build #69751 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69751/consoleFull)**
for PR 16178 at commit
Github user lichenglin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
In fact,I'm using zeppelin to run sql.
When I restart spark interpreter , the folders are deleted.
Thank you a lot
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
**[Test build #69763 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69763/consoleFull)**
for PR 16183 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
[SPARK-18671][SS][TEST] Follow up PR to fix test for Maven
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Maven compilation seem to not allow resource is sql/test to be easily
referred
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
/cc @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16173
since the trait BroadcastFactory is design for multiple implements, is't
reasonable to provide a way to change the implement of BroadcastFactory? or
only TorrentBroadcastFactory is enough
---
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
@srowen No, I think this maybe the third of five PR. Distinct from the
first two PRs which only deal with the overlook, the PR modify the hierarchy of
classification `Model`s in the python
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r91210953
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -68,9 +69,16 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109#discussion_r91210829
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ private[kafka010] case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16180
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69760/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109#discussion_r91210695
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -811,6 +812,12 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16180
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16180
**[Test build #69760 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69760/consoleFull)**
for PR 16180 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16178
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69750/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
**[Test build #69761 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69761/consoleFull)**
for PR 16182 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69762 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69762/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109#discussion_r91210556
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaTestUtils.scala
---
@@ -286,36 +286,56 @@ class KafkaTestUtils extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16178
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16178
**[Test build #69750 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69750/consoleFull)**
for PR 16178 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16180
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69759/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16180
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16180
**[Test build #69759 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69759/consoleFull)**
for PR 16180 at commit
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
[SPARK-18754][SS] Rename recentProgresses to recentProgress
Based on an informal survey, users find this option easier to understand /
remember.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16159
Thanks, @srowen @zsxwing . My bad. I am looking into it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user merlintang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
do you exit the spark shell ? I have tested on this, and this staging file
would be removed after we exit the spark shell under spark 2.0.x.
meanwhile, the staging file are used for
101 - 200 of 596 matches
Mail list logo
