Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16342
**[Test build #70382 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70382/testReport)**
for PR 16342 at commit
[`258da6f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70381/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70381 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70381/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
[`299a13d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70389/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
**[Test build #70389 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70389/testReport)**
for PR 16263 at commit
[`e02695e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16232
@viirya That's not correct, the values does not have entry in the array.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16343
**[Test build #70391 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70391/testReport)**
for PR 16343 at commit
[`04fa2f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/04
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340
Merging to master/2.1/2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user merlintang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
@gatorsmile one more customer is running into this issue in the spark
1.6.x. I backport the code #16134 to here and test it manually. Please verify.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70378/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340
**[Test build #70378 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70378/testReport)**
for PR 16340 at commit
[`236efe5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16232
@davies Yes, that is an extreme case. I use it to explain how we can cause
the exception.
Even we don't consider the extreme case if we don't pass the kind of map
in, the original assert `ma
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16344
Jenkins, add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16345
**[Test build #70390 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70390/testReport)**
for PR 16345 at commit
[`b4b5552`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16344
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16341
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70380/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16341
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16341
**[Test build #70380 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70380/testReport)**
for PR 16341 at commit
[`155f9ab`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16345
cc @vanzin want to review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16345
[SPARK-17755][Core]Use workerRef to send RegisterWorkerResponse to avoid
the race condition
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The root cause of this issue is that Registe
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16344
[SPARK-18929][ML] Add Tweedie distribution in GLM
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I propose to add the full Tweedie family into the
GeneralizedLinearRegression model. T
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
**[Test build #70389 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70389/testReport)**
for PR 16263 at commit
[`e02695e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775
**[Test build #70388 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70388/testReport)**
for PR 12775 at commit
[`699730b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/69
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
We will separate this file to multiple files.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16282
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70386/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263#discussion_r93143569
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -558,6 +558,18 @@ def test_create_dataframe_from_objects(self):
self.assertEqual(df.dtypes, [("key",
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16282
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16282
**[Test build #70386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70386/testReport)**
for PR 16282 at commit
[`410c223`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263#discussion_r93143410
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -135,12 +135,12 @@ def _load_from_socket(port, serializer):
break
if not sock:
raise
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340
LGTM - pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16343
**[Test build #70387 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70387/testReport)**
for PR 16343 at commit
[`92144e4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/92
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
This is getting pretty close. Can you update the description to define more
formally semantics for timezone?
In addition, I think we also need to have a follow-up pr to focus on data
sources (
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775
Yeah, that's ok, @kayousterhout
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16343
**[Test build #70385 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70385/testReport)**
for PR 16343 at commit
[`dc6d8ed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16343
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70385/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16343
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775
LGTM -- are you ok with merging this @markhamstra, after re-testing it
since it's been so long?
Sorry for neglecting this @lirui-intel!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16343
**[Test build #70385 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70385/testReport)**
for PR 16343 at commit
[`dc6d8ed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/dc
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16282
**[Test build #70386 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70386/testReport)**
for PR 16282 at commit
[`410c223`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/41
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16282
cc @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16261
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16343
[FLAKY-TEST][DO NOT MERGE] InputStreamsSuite.socket input stream
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://spark-tests.appspot.com/test-details?suite_name=org.apache.spark
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16261
Merged this to master. Thanks @shivaram!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70375/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70375 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70375/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
[`185f177`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12436
@sitalkedia this has been inactive for a while and there were a few issues
pointed out above that haven't yet been resolved. Do you have time to work on
this? Otherwise, can you close the PR?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16314
**[Test build #70384 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70384/testReport)**
for PR 16314 at commit
[`6775639`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/67
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16338
**[Test build #70383 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70383/testReport)**
for PR 16338 at commit
[`c86dc72`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c8
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16261
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user sarutak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16338
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16342
**[Test build #70382 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70382/testReport)**
for PR 16342 at commit
[`258da6f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/25
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70377/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16341
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16341
**[Test build #70379 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70379/testReport)**
for PR 16341 at commit
[`6e0cc04`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16341
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70379/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70376/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70376 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70376/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
[`8fbb387`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16342
[SPARK-18927][SS] MemorySink for StructuredStreaming can't recover from
checkpoint if location is provided in SessionConf
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Checkpoint Loca
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16341
**[Test build #70380 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70380/testReport)**
for PR 16341 at commit
[`155f9ab`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/15
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70381 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70381/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
[`299a13d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16341
**[Test build #70379 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70379/testReport)**
for PR 16341 at commit
[`6e0cc04`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6e
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16341
[SQL] [WIP] Switch internal catalog types to use URI instead of string for
locationUri
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This should help prevent accidental incorrect conve
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16232
@viirya A map with multiple values for same key, is only used for hashed
relation, not aggregation, will also not passed into UnsafeKVExternalSorter. So
I think this is not actually a bug.
---
If y
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70373/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
**[Test build #70373 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70373/testReport)**
for PR 16053 at commit
[`ecd0731`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263#discussion_r93127142
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -558,6 +558,18 @@ def test_create_dataframe_from_objects(self):
self.assertEqual(df.dtypes, [("key",
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263#discussion_r93126957
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -135,12 +135,12 @@ def _load_from_socket(port, serializer):
break
if not sock:
raise
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340
For a bit of context on the `UnsafeSorter` changes, note that there are
currently 5 implementations of UnsafeSorterIterator but three of those are just
chaining / merging wrappers around the two i
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340#discussion_r93125739
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -94,6 +97,14 @@ public boolean hasNext() {
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340#discussion_r93125701
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillReader.java
---
@@ -51,6 +53,7 @@
private byte[] arr = n
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340
**[Test build #70378 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70378/testReport)**
for PR 16340 at commit
[`236efe5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/23
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340#discussion_r93125645
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ private[jdbc] class JDBCRDD(
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16340
[SPARK-18928] Check TaskContext.isInterrupted() in FileScanRDD, JDBCRDD &
UnsafeSorter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In order to respond to task cancellation, Spark
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70371/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
**[Test build #70371 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70371/testReport)**
for PR 16189 at commit
[`9cff80f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70368/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
**[Test build #70368 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70368/testReport)**
for PR 16189 at commit
[`d87c8f6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16282
**[Test build #70370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70370/testReport)**
for PR 16282 at commit
[`fd63513`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16282
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16282
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70370/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322#discussion_r93121938
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -206,6 +201,36 @@ class StreamExecution(
s
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
This is great! Thanks for taking the time to write up such complete
examples. I think this was a big gap in the existing docs. One other ask.
The screen-shot is great, but I'd like to see which
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70372/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70372/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
[`ccb2a51`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329#discussion_r93119785
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/UserDefinedTypedAggregation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329#discussion_r93121147
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/UserDefinedTypedAggregation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329#discussion_r93118905
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/JavaUserDefinedTypedAggregation.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
101 - 200 of 428 matches
Mail list logo
