Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329#discussion_r93118975
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/JavaUserDefinedTypedAggregation.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496#discussion_r93112496
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -705,6 +705,23 @@ def __eq__(self, other):
return Vectors._equals(self.indices, self.va
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496#discussion_r93116390
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -705,6 +705,23 @@ def __eq__(self, other):
return Vectors._equals(self.indices, self.va
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496#discussion_r93116698
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -705,6 +705,23 @@ def __eq__(self, other):
return Vectors._equals(self.indices, self.va
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496#discussion_r93113956
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -705,6 +705,23 @@ def __eq__(self, other):
return Vectors._equals(self.indices, self.va
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322#discussion_r93117073
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -206,6 +201,36 @@ class StreamExecution(
st
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10605#discussion_r93116743
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeInMemorySorter.java
---
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
import java.util.Comp
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16240
/cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
Hi, @rxin and @falaki .
If there are some committers to review this part, I think you are the best
persons.
Could you give some opinion about this when you have some time?
---
If your
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322#discussion_r93114298
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -206,6 +201,36 @@ class StreamExecution(
st
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70374/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
**[Test build #70374 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70374/testReport)**
for PR 16329 at commit
[`d059d5d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user neggert commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15018
@srowen Addressed your comments and fixed some style issues.
Some updated timings:
Alternating decreasing input
val x = (1 to length).toArray.map(_.toDouble)
val
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322#discussion_r93113059
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -206,6 +201,36 @@ class StreamExecution(
s
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
I'm not sure whether that change would be a problem, but I wonder if a
system where listeners can "opt in" to this behavior wouldn't be better. e.g.,
`EventLoggingListener` can slow down the bus, hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70377 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70377/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
[`fb74f62`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fb
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
cc @tdas @brkyvz @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322#discussion_r9324
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamTest.scala ---
@@ -240,7 +241,7 @@ trait StreamTest extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLC
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
> You are right, that's why the executor service is single threaded which
guarantees ordered processing of the events per listener.
But this is still substantially different from the ord
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70376 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70376/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
[`8fbb387`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16321
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70369/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16321
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16321
**[Test build #70369 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70369/testReport)**
for PR 16321 at commit
[`471740b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16326
Oh I see, you're saying if there are old files for the partition, the
INSERT INTO will cause those to become visible. That is a little confusing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70375 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70375/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
[`185f177`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/18
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
Can we create some higher level logical grouping and put these queries into
multiple files? It's not as useful to dump 200 queries in one file.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16314
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16314
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70367/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16314
**[Test build #70367 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70367/testReport)**
for PR 16314 at commit
[`abff69c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
**[Test build #70374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70374/testReport)**
for PR 16329 at commit
[`d059d5d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d0
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16332
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16332
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Merging to master/2.1. @xuanyuanking can you open a backport for 2.0, if we
also need to merge this to that branche?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16288
@srowen it looks like 2.0 has a different plan from master. I pushed a fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70366/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
**[Test build #70366 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70366/testReport)**
for PR 16296 at commit
[`8dafb9d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Go for it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
Could we split the test suites based on the subquery types?
- [With
aliases](https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190410(v=sql.105).aspx).
- With IN or NOT IN
- [Sub
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r89886595
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -232,6 +225,13 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
**[Test build #70373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70373/testReport)**
for PR 16053 at commit
[`ecd0731`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ec
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r89889108
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -247,28 +248,29 @@ class CoarseGrainedSche
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r89872502
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,179 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r89872712
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,179 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r89895008
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -993,6 +993,12 @@ class DAGScheduler(
JavaUtils.buffe
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93096132
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subq01-in-subquery.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,452 @@
+-- A test suite for IN predicate subquery
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70372/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
[`ccb2a51`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cc
Github user dusenberrymw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263#discussion_r93093157
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -135,12 +135,12 @@ def _load_from_socket(port, serializer):
break
if not sock:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
This change is ready for review @rxin, @zsxwing, @kayousterhout
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70365/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16338
**[Test build #70365 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70365/testReport)**
for PR 16338 at commit
[`c86dc72`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16282
**[Test build #70370 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70370/testReport)**
for PR 16282 at commit
[`fd63513`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fd
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
**[Test build #70371 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70371/testReport)**
for PR 16189 at commit
[`9cff80f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16321
**[Test build #70369 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70369/testReport)**
for PR 16321 at commit
[`471740b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/47
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16321
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16282
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
**[Test build #70368 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70368/testReport)**
for PR 16189 at commit
[`d87c8f6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d8
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053#discussion_r93091673
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,119 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16339
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user alunarbeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16339
@dongjoon-hyun Please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user alunarbeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16339
[SPARK-18917][SQL] Add Skip Partition Check Flag to avoid list all leaf
files in append mode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently saving a dataframe in append mode
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93090592
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subq01-in-subquery.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,452 @@
+-- A test suite for IN predicate subquery
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16295
This looks fine, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
Also I need to fix up the Mesos functionality here. I deliberately posted
a broken Mesos version to verify my hypothesis that there are no end-to-end
Mesos tests (this code would have failed
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16303
Closing in favor of the other PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user vanzin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16303
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
@witgo @kayousterhout where do we stand on this and
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053? Both still viable alternatives?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053 is still missing pe
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
Thanks for the review @squito. I got sidetracked from this at the end of
last week and forgot to post the results of some benchmarks @shivaram and I did
on a 20-machine m2.4xlarge EC2 machine
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r93087921
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -432,6 +465,93 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
/**
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r93087804
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -432,6 +465,93 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16314
**[Test build #70367 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70367/testReport)**
for PR 16314 at commit
[`abff69c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ab
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16314
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
**[Test build #70366 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70366/testReport)**
for PR 16296 at commit
[`8dafb9d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70361/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057
**[Test build #70361 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70361/testReport)**
for PR 16057 at commit
[`23089fa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16336
Ur, that's true. The effective benefit might be tiny. I'll keep a few days
and close this if there is no response from the others.
Thank you for review.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70360/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
**[Test build #70360 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70360/testReport)**
for PR 16291 at commit
[`66e4f12`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053#discussion_r93080712
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,119 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70359/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70359 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70359/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
[`6746265`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
In Spark, we can use the following way to send the whole query to the
underlying data source.
```SQL
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE jdbcTable
USING jdbc
OPTIONS (
url "jdbc:postgre
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16335
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70358/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16335
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r93079839
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,179 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16335
**[Test build #70358 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70358/testReport)**
for PR 16335 at commit
[`54f0b77`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70362/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
**[Test build #70362 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70362/testReport)**
for PR 16337 at commit
[`c2ca009`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r93078511
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -139,29 +139,6 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends SparkFunSu
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r93077759
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/local/LocalSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -59,6 +62,12 @@ private[spark] class LocalEndpoint(
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16332
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
201 - 300 of 428 matches
Mail list logo
