Github user azmras commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429#discussion_r94367710
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -382,18 +382,30 @@ def _hijack_namedtuple():
return
global _old_namedtuple # or it
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
**[Test build #70806 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70806/testReport)**
for PR 16233 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94367053
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -377,6 +378,39 @@ case class
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94366859
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -377,6 +378,39 @@ case class
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94366640
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -510,32 +510,94 @@ class Analyzer(
*
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
ping @srowen @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
**[Test build #70805 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70805/testReport)**
for PR 12135 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Just for your reference, below is the conversion charts of MS SQL Server.
It includes both implicit and explicit conversion rules.
**
for PR 15240 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
**[Test build #70803 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70803/testReport)**
for PR 15324 at commit
Github user scwf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15240
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
**[Test build #70799 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70799/testReport)**
for PR 15324 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70799/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
**[Test build #70802 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70802/testReport)**
for PR 15324 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
**[Test build #70801 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70801/testReport)**
for PR 16371 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94364696
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -510,32 +510,94 @@ class Analyzer(
* Replaces
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
**[Test build #70800 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70800/testReport)**
for PR 16233 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
@WeichenXu123 Thanks! Will take a look once I get back from vacation (in a
week). Happy new year!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371#discussion_r94363919
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -88,19 +92,19 @@ abstract class Collect
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371#discussion_r94363879
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -88,19 +92,19 @@ abstract class Collect
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371#discussion_r94363844
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/RewriteDistinctAggregatesSuite.scala
---
@@ -16,16 +16,16 @@
*/
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
The test case coverage in the suite `CSVInferSchemaSuite.scala` looks
random. I am afraid the future code changes could easily break the existing
type inference rules. Could you improve it in a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
**[Test build #70799 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70799/testReport)**
for PR 15324 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70795/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
**[Test build #70795 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70795/testReport)**
for PR 16320 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
@brkyvz I update code and attach a running result screenshot, waiting for
your review, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
**[Test build #70798 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70798/testReport)**
for PR 16320 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
Yep. I added the testcase, too. @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user merlintang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819#discussion_r94361979
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -216,5 +218,37 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16255#discussion_r94361717
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ object RemoveAliasOnlyProject
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
**[Test build #70797 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70797/testReport)**
for PR 15880 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16255#discussion_r94361709
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ object RemoveAliasOnlyProject
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16448
**[Test build #70796 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70796/testReport)**
for PR 16448 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
I assumed this one. Right?
```scala
val path = "/tmp/test1"
Seq(s"${Long.MaxValue}1", "2015-12-01 00:00:00",
"1").toDF().coalesce(1).write.text(path)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422#discussion_r94361604
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -300,10 +300,21 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
Please add the test case?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r94360417
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/in-subquery/simple-in.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+-- Automatically generated by
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819#discussion_r94360355
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -216,5 +218,37 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819#discussion_r94360173
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -216,5 +218,37 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r94360158
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/in-subquery/simple-in.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+-- Automatically generated by
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r94359988
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/in-subquery/simple-in.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+-- Automatically generated by
Github user merlintang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819#discussion_r94359244
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -216,5 +218,37 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16456
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user liujianhuiouc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16456
[SPARK-18994] clean up the local directories for application in future by
annother thread
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
clean up the directories of the app by
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
**[Test build #70794 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70794/testReport)**
for PR 15324 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70794/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user mpjlu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16452
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16452
@sethah , thanks, I got it wrong. I will close it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
Thank you again, @cloud-fan and @HyukjinKwon . I updated the fallback
datatype.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
**[Test build #70795 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70795/testReport)**
for PR 16320 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320#discussion_r94358461
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ private[csv] object
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320#discussion_r94358447
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ private[csv] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70793/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320#discussion_r94358365
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ private[csv] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
**[Test build #70793 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70793/testReport)**
for PR 16454 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16453
**[Test build #70792 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70792/testReport)**
for PR 16453 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16453
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70792/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16453
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16452
@mpjlu This is the behavior I get:
scala
scala> import org.apache.spark.ml.classification.LogisticRegression
import org.apache.spark.ml.classification.LogisticRegression
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16438
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923#discussion_r94358078
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -305,40 +316,84 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16438
LGTM, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422#discussion_r94357987
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -300,10 +300,21 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user neurons commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16455
@tdas could you accept this small PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320#discussion_r94357821
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ private[csv] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16455
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401
@cloud-fan In the current stage, we have Filter, Agg, Join, Project, etc.
Although there are only four plans, the `if` code is still repeated. Moreover,
in the future, when we have other kind of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
**[Test build #70794 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70794/testReport)**
for PR 15324 at commit
GitHub user neurons opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16455
[MINOR][DOCS] Remove the duplicated word/ typo in Streaming Docs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the section **Handling Late Data and Watermarking** in Structured
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
**[Test build #70793 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70793/testReport)**
for PR 16454 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
The test failure is caused by another issue. I've submitted another PR to
fix it: #16454. Once that is fixed, this test can be passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
[SPARK-19055][SQL][PySpark] Fix SparkSession initialization when
SparkContext is stopped
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SparkSession initialization, we
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16448
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16448#discussion_r94357410
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -346,6 +346,46 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
Found a bug filed in a JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19035. This PR does not resolves
it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401
> Then we need to modify all the existing implementation of statistics and
do if(cboEnabled) test in each of them. That would be tedious.
hm? I think we only need to do `if(cboEnabled)`
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
@gatorsmile it conflicts with branch 2.0, please send a new PR, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16452
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16452
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70790/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16452
**[Test build #70790 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70790/testReport)**
for PR 16452 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16453
**[Test build #70792 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70792/testReport)**
for PR 16453 at commit
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16453
[SPARK-19054][ML] Eliminate extra pass in NB
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
eliminate unnecessary extra pass in NB's train
## How was this patch tested?
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15829
Sure. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16452
If both threshold and thresholds are not set, the master will return
thresholds.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16452
What is not right? Could you be more specific? The behavior for master
branch seems to align with the comments, but maybe I'm missing it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70791/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
**[Test build #70791 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70791/testReport)**
for PR 15324 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user Tagar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923#discussion_r94356127
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -305,40 +316,84 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
**[Test build #70791 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70791/testReport)**
for PR 15324 at commit
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
