Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71255/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
**[Test build #71255 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71255/testReport)**
for PR 16561 at commit
[`0e82340`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
@vijoshi Can you solve the conflict?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
thanks, I will keep track of this after hive and datasource unified .
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549/files#r95670788
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
**[Test build #71264 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71264/consoleFull)**
for PR 15945 at commit
[`6bd225f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71264/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
**[Test build #71264 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71264/consoleFull)**
for PR 15945 at commit
[`6bd225f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
**[Test build #71258 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71258/testReport)**
for PR 16549 at commit
[`569a58f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71258/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16523#discussion_r95790319
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -132,6 +132,26 @@ test_that("spark.kmeans", {
expect_true(summary2$is.loaded)
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16562
This functionality is so obscure I'd suspect it should be deprecated. Does
anyone have a thought about that?
In any event, it's fair enough to document it.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16213
**[Test build #71263 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71263/testReport)**
for PR 16213 at commit
[`7f8336c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16562
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user mcuelenaere opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16562
Document local[*,F] master modes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala contains
LOCAL_N_FAILURES_REGEX master mode
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71262/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
**[Test build #71262 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71262/testReport)**
for PR 15945 at commit
[`da25be6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16213
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71260/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16213
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16213
**[Test build #71260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71260/testReport)**
for PR 16213 at commit
[`1b89a0a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
**[Test build #71262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71262/testReport)**
for PR 15945 at commit
[`da25be6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/da
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454 has been merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
thanks, merging to maser/2.1/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945#discussion_r95782977
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/QueryExecution.scala ---
@@ -90,18 +92,27 @@ class QueryExecution(val sparkSession: SparkSess
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71257/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574
**[Test build #71257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71257/testReport)**
for PR 12574 at commit
[`32fde78`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945#discussion_r95782620
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/QueryExecution.scala ---
@@ -90,18 +92,27 @@ class QueryExecution(val sparkSession: SparkS
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
**[Test build #71261 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71261/testReport)**
for PR 16550 at commit
[`beb4fd8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/be
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
LGTM except https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549/files#r95670788
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16213
**[Test build #71260 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71260/testReport)**
for PR 16213 at commit
[`1b89a0a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16560
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71252/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16560
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15018
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16560
**[Test build #71252 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71252/testReport)**
for PR 16560 at commit
[`d2c651c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16379
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
updated. Merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16533
@rdblue Unified `udf` which supports all cases (`udf(f)`, decorator with
parentheses and without, decorator with `returnType`) could be implemented like
this:
```python
def _udf(f, re
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
@hvanhovell @cloud-fan Could you check this? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15928
**[Test build #71259 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71259/testReport)**
for PR 15928 at commit
[`d7be870`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d7
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474#discussion_r95778417
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -135,11 +135,21 @@ class FileScanRDD(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
**[Test build #71258 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71258/testReport)**
for PR 16549 at commit
[`569a58f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/56
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474#discussion_r95777107
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -135,11 +135,21 @@ class FileScanRDD(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474#discussion_r95777029
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -135,11 +135,21 @@ class FileScanRDD(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15018#discussion_r95775162
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/IsotonicRegression.scala
---
@@ -312,10 +313,19 @@ class IsotonicRegression private (private
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
this patch is ready for review. Anyone?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574
**[Test build #71257 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71257/testReport)**
for PR 12574 at commit
[`32fde78`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/32
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14812
**[Test build #71256 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71256/testReport)**
for PR 14812 at commit
[`2e567cc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16440
Merged to 2.1/2.0 as well. I agree, it's a clean fix for a non-trivial
problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16527
@wangyum one more though. I note that there are actually three instances in
this file where a collection is trimmed to match a max retained number of
things. See this quite related change:
https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71254/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536
**[Test build #71254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71254/testReport)**
for PR 16536 at commit
[`c936813`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
**[Test build #71255 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71255/testReport)**
for PR 16561 at commit
[`0e82340`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71250/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
**[Test build #71250 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71250/testReport)**
for PR 16550 at commit
[`beb4fd8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
[SPARK-18209][SQL] Alias the view with its child by mapping the columns by
index
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a follow-up to address the comments
htt
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16555
**[Test build #3525 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3525/testReport)**
for PR 16555 at commit
[`44388a1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user ash211 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
You covered my concerns!
I think this will fix some parts of this problem for sure, not sure if it
covers every possible case though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16555
**[Test build #3525 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3525/testReport)**
for PR 16555 at commit
[`44388a1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71253/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512
**[Test build #71253 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71253/testReport)**
for PR 16512 at commit
[`8b722b5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16538
Thanks @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536
**[Test build #71254 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71254/testReport)**
for PR 16536 at commit
[`c936813`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c9
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16415
If you closed SPARK-19007, please update the title to match the new JIRA
@zdh2292390
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16558
(@ash211 could you standardize the title? if it's a fix-up of SPARK-13671
it should start with `[SPARK-13671]`)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
Is there not a library method for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16554
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16554
LGTM, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
Make sure you update the pull request and jira ticket description before
you merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r95753220
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -52,7 +55,43 @@ private[spark] class TaskDescription(
val addedF
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512
**[Test build #71253 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71253/testReport)**
for PR 16512 at commit
[`8b722b5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8b
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
LGTM on the behavior
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16560
**[Test build #71252 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71252/testReport)**
for PR 16560 at commit
[`d2c651c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d2
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16560
[SPARK-19179][YARN] Change spark.yarn.access.namenodes config and update
docs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`spark.yarn.access.namenodes` configuration cannot actua
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16559
Do we not have something similar already? cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
@ash211
Thank you so much for your comment. I've changed accordingly.
Could you please give another look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16538
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16538
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71251/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
**[Test build #71251 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71251/testReport)**
for PR 16454 at commit
[`6078c7d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16548
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16548
Merged into master and branch-2.1. Thanks for reviewing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16516#discussion_r95745585
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ private[classification] trait LogisticRe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16559
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
also cc @rxin to take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gczsjdy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16559
cc @chenghao-intel @adrian-wang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
GitHub user gczsjdy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16559
Add expression index and test cases
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expression Index returns the value of index n (right) of the array/map
(left).
To be consistent
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
**[Test build #71251 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71251/testReport)**
for PR 16454 at commit
[`6078c7d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/60
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
301 - 400 of 407 matches
Mail list logo
