Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #72406 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72406/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
**[Test build #72405 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72405/testReport)**
for PR 16762 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
cc @cloud-fan @gatorsmile @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72403/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
**[Test build #72403 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72403/testReport)**
for PR 16803 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
Did the comparison. The results match what DB2 returned. Do you think we
can remove some duplicate test cases in `SubquerySuite.scala`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72401/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72401 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72401/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72404/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72404/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16794
that would be great @actuaryzhang - I think SPARK-11976 would be the place
to start.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
this is the CRAN check error:
```
* checking for missing documentation entries ... WARNING
Undocumented S4 methods:
generic 'to_date' and siglist 'Column,missing'
generic
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72400/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
**[Test build #72400 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72400/testReport)**
for PR 16783 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Where is this file
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/ScriptTransformationExec.scala
?
Your PR needs to remove it
Github user ooq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349#discussion_r99481369
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/FixedLengthRowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702#discussion_r99481277
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/script/ScriptTransformationExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,337 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702#discussion_r99481193
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/script/ScriptTransformationExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,337 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
So far, we do not have any end-to-end test case for `ScriptTransformation`
without enabling Hive support. The test cases we have are all in hive/test:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
**[Test build #72403 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72403/testReport)**
for PR 16803 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72404 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72404/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72402/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72402 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72402/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72402 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72402/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
I just changed the log message, but not sure if it clear enough.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jinxing64 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16807
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user jinxing64 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
[SPARK-19398] Change one misleading log in TaskSetManager.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Log below is misleading:
```
if (successful(index)) {
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16807
[SPARK-19398] Change one misleading log in TaskSetManager.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Log below is misleading:
```
if (successful(index)) {
Github user jinxing64 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72401 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72401/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
**[Test build #72400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72400/testReport)**
for PR 16783 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Hi, @gatorsmile .
Could you review this PR for fixing maven build?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16798#discussion_r99480025
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/scalar-subquery/scalar-subquery-predicate.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
+-- A test
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16798#discussion_r99480006
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/scalar-subquery/scalar-subquery-predicate.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
+-- A test
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16794
@felixcheung I'll be happy to look into this and fix it. Do you want me to
open a new JIRA or just create a PR against SPARK-19460?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16802#discussion_r99479814
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/exists-subquery/exists-joins-and-set-ops.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+-- Tests
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16794
that's awesome - it's likely a recent change we have missed. If you dig
through the history of various related JIRAs you should be able to pinpoint a
couple of places (at least 2, on top of my
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72397/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #72397 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72397/testReport)**
for PR 16138 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r99479616
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala ---
@@ -162,6 +162,27 @@ abstract class OrcSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72398/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16794
@felixcheung I am in favor of the first proposal to support dot in names.
I'm curious why this was not supported yet since we can create DataFrame in
Spark with dot in names?
```
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #72398 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72398/testReport)**
for PR 16043 at commit
GitHub user actuaryzhang reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16794
[SPARK-19452][SparkR] Fix bug in the name assignment method
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The names method fails to check for validity of the assignment values.
Github user actuaryzhang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16794
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72399/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
**[Test build #72399 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72399/testReport)**
for PR 16762 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
I might need more time to review this PR. Will keep posting my comments in
the next week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702#discussion_r99479053
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/script/ScriptTransformationExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,337 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16739
hmm, not as far as I can see:
```
> df2 <- repartition(df1, 10)
> getNumPartitions(df2) # right after repartition the number of partition
is greater than the original numSlices
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
Thanks! @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
Bringing back schema inference is certainly a much cleaner option, although
I imagine doing this in the old manner would negate the performance
improvements brought by #14690 for any non-Spark 2.1
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16794
opened SPARK-19460.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16792#discussion_r99478139
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1272,16 +1272,18 @@ def replace(self, to_replace, value, subset=None):
"""Returns a new
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
**[Test build #72399 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72399/testReport)**
for PR 16762 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
hmm, this seems like a reasonable approach. With these changes:
- collect on timestamp would get `c("POSIXct", "POSIXt")`
- coltypes output will not change
@shivaram what do you
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800#discussion_r99477755
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1376,6 +1376,10 @@ setGeneric("spark.kstest", function(data, ...) {
standardGeneric("spark.kstest")
#' @export
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #72398 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72398/testReport)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #72397 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72397/testReport)**
for PR 16138 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #72396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72396/testReport)**
for PR 16138 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72396/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #72396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72396/testReport)**
for PR 16138 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72394/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
**[Test build #72394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72394/testReport)**
for PR 16138 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72395/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
**[Test build #72395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72395/testReport)**
for PR 16762 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16806
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16806
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72388/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16806
**[Test build #72388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72388/testReport)**
for PR 16806 at commit
Github user eyalfa commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043#discussion_r99475332
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/complexTypesSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user eyalfa commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043#discussion_r99475106
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/complexTypesSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user eyalfa commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043#discussion_r99475096
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/complexTypesSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72386/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16636
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16636
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72387/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
**[Test build #72386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72386/testReport)**
for PR 16765 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16636
**[Test build #72387 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72387/testReport)**
for PR 16636 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800#discussion_r99474739
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1376,6 +1376,10 @@ setGeneric("spark.kstest", function(data, ...) {
standardGeneric("spark.kstest")
#'
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696#discussion_r99474494
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/StatsEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -18,12 +18,41 @@
package
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99474371
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -489,6 +491,29 @@ class StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72393/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
