Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
`SET LOCATION` can also be done over individual partitions of the table.
Are you planning to handle that as well in this PR ? If it already works,
please add test case(s) for that.
---
If
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#discussion_r100695733
--- Diff: R/pkg/DESCRIPTION ---
@@ -54,5 +54,5 @@ Collate:
'types.R'
'utils.R'
'window.R'
-RoxygenNote: 5.0.1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72782/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72782 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72782/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72781/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72781 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72781/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16902
**[Test build #72786 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72786/testReport)**
for PR 16902 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16686
Hi @kayousterhout, a fix to `KafkaSourceSuite.subscribing topic by pattern
with topic deletions` is here: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16902
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72779/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72779/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16902
ok all 100 times of `KafkaSourceSuite` passed.
now revert back to one normal pass of testing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16902
**[Test build #72784 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72784/testReport)**
for PR 16902 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16902
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16902
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72784/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72777/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72771/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
**[Test build #72771 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72771/testReport)**
for PR 16899 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #72785 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72785/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72777/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72776/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72776/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16902
**[Test build #72784 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72784/testReport)**
for PR 16902 at commit
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16902
[SPARK-19564][SS][KAFKA] KafkaOffsetReader's consumers should not be in the
same group
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `KafkaOffsetReader`, when error occurs, we
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16902
Let's start by running only KafkaSourceSuite for 100 times
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lw-lin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72780/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72780 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72780/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72775/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72775/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72783/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72783 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72783/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
@cloud-fan I remove the islenient param, the tests passed, it seems remove
islenient is ok
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
@kayousterhout
Thanks a lot for the clear explanation. It makes great sense to me and help
me understand the logic a lot. Also I think the way of testing is very good and
make the code very
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72783/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16901
@kayousterhout @squito @markhamstra
As mentioned in #16620 , I think it might make sense to make this pr.
Please take a look. If you think it is too trivial, I will close.
---
If your
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100692456
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +142,26 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100692415
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +142,26 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100692348
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +142,26 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16901
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16901
[SPARK-19565] Improve DAGScheduler tests.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is related to #16620.
When fetch failed, stage will be resubmitted. There can be
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72774/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
**[Test build #72774 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72774/testReport)**
for PR 16674 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72778/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72778/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72782/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72781/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72780/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11192
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72779/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72778/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user lw-lin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
ok, all 100 times of `KafkaSourceSuite` passed.
let's now do a full pass of testing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Thanks @cloud-fan for your detailed review. I will keep in mind those
comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72769/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72777 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72777/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72769 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72769/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777#discussion_r100690775
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +386,67 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72768/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72768 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72768/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72773/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72773/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72776/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72766/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72766 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72766/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72765/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72775 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72775/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72765 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72765/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
**[Test build #72774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72774/testReport)**
for PR 16674 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72773 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72773/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Let's start by running only `KafkaSourceSuite` for 1000 times
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72772/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100689894
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -617,13 +617,17 @@ class Analyzer(
private
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
[SPARK-19564][SS][KAFKA] KafkaOffsetReader's consumers should not be in the
same group
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100689818
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveSQLViewSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72767/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
**[Test build #72767 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72767/testReport)**
for PR 16898 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
**[Test build #72770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72770/testReport)**
for PR 16899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72770/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
**[Test build #72771 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72771/testReport)**
for PR 16899 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
**[Test build #72770 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72770/testReport)**
for PR 16899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72764/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
[DO_NOT_MERGE][Test] Investigate KafkaSourceSuite flakiness
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch
201 - 300 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
