Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17006
Hi @ndimiduk, it seems failed to build. Extending `NamedExpression` seems
breaking `ResolveAliases`.
I tested this with the codes below:
```scala
Seq(Tuple1(Tuple1(1) ::
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826#discussion_r102129943
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -1178,4 +1178,34 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16996
**[Test build #73198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73198/testReport)**
for PR 16996 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16996
this is a minor improvement, it is better to keep the same value between
sparkConf and hadoopConf, and add some loginfo for user debug.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73197/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #73197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73197/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73195/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #73195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73195/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #73197 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73197/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73196/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #73195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73195/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73194 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73194/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r102126586
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -114,22 +114,30 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
val tablePath
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73193/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r102126306
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -139,6 +140,13 @@ case class HiveTableScanExec(
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17008
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17008
LGTM. Just checked the console output. It already passes the build.
Thank! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17002
uh... I missed that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17008
I meet the same error in branch master :
**overriding lazy value sessionState in class SparkSession of type
org.apache.spark.sql.internal.SessionState; lazy value sessionState has weaker
access
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17008
**[Test build #73192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73192/testReport)**
for PR 17008 at commit
Github user ZunwenYou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17000
Hi, @MLnick
You are right, sliceAggregate splits an array into smaller chunks before
shuffle.
It has three advantage
Firstly, the shuffle data is less than treeAggregate during the
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17002
@gatorsmile @rxin
the latest success test build at commit a0c22a8 not the latest commit
7d3cdd6.
The open session state will cause the TestSQLContext compile failed, I have
make a
GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17008
[SPARK-19669][HOTFIX][SQL] sessionState access privileges compiled in
TestSQLContext
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In
Github user ZunwenYou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17000
Hi, @MLnick
You are right, sliceAggregate splits an array into smaller chunks before
shuffle.
It has three advantage
Firstly, the shuffle data is less than treeAggregate during the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73191 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73191/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73191/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r102121338
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -139,6 +140,13 @@ case class HiveTableScanExec(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17007
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user 10110346 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17007
change 'var' to 'val' for better Specification
Signed-off-by: liuxian
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73191/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16998
> I do not get your points. What does this mean? Constraint propagation is
a bottom up mechanism for inferring the constraints. Can you elaborate your
idea in the more formal way.
We fully
Github user Gauravshah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16842
@brkyvz can I do something to take it forward ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16726
Great!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r102117217
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1494,4 +1495,149 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818#discussion_r102115145
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/WindowSpec.scala ---
@@ -180,16 +180,20 @@ class WindowSpec private[sql](
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73190/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #73190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73190/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16851
ping @srowen again. Is this ready to go? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #73190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73190/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user lxsmnv commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16995
@HyukjinKwon the problem that I have found was in CSVFileFormat. So its
more of csv specific. However, it can be a problem of some other data source
types, but not all - it will depend on data
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17006
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user ndimiduk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17006
[SPARK-17636] Parquet filter push down doesn't handle struct fields
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Changes `DataSourceStrategy#translateFilter` to operate on a
Github user lxsmnv commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16995
@viirya I've removed a duplicate call for getOrInferFileFormatSchema.
Thanks for pointing out.
@maropu I've added the test case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73189 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73189/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73189/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73189 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73189/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73188/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
**[Test build #73188 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73188/testReport)**
for PR 16977 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
**[Test build #73188 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73188/testReport)**
for PR 16977 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16726
can you hold it for a while? I'm removing the `MetastoreRelation` entirely.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15604
Hi @kayousterhout and @squito,
This PR is ready to re-review.
All feedbacks are welcome and thanks in advance ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Yes, it can be merged as-is. I would create a JIRA for the builder
interface, and start working on it simultaneously.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz Just for clarification, can this PR be merged as-is with a separate
Jira/PR for adding a builder interface or is the builder interface a
prerequisite for merging this?
---
If your project
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
This LGTM from a code and API pov, but I can't strongly speak to the
security side.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Cannot figure out what's exactly causing the test to fail. Error message is
not informative. Any help please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16999
Ah, yes. It seems they are new ones by some rescent commits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73187/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73187 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73187/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73187 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73187/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73186/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73186/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73186/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73185 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73185/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73185/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73185 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73185/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17004
cc @cloud-fan @tejasapatil
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73184 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73184/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73184/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17002
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73184/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17002
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17003
Merged to 2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17003
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17003
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73178/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17003
**[Test build #73178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73178/testReport)**
for PR 17003 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73183/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73183 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73183/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17002
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73176/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17002
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17002
**[Test build #73176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73176/testReport)**
for PR 17002 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17005
**[Test build #73183 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73183/testReport)**
for PR 17005 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73180/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17004
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17004
**[Test build #73180 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73180/testReport)**
for PR 17004 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16726
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16726
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73179/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16726
**[Test build #73179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73179/testReport)**
for PR 16726 at commit
101 - 200 of 394 matches
Mail list logo