Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106840886
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -55,108 +52,6 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106840806
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1354,9 +1354,8 @@ test_that("column functions", {
# passing option
df <-
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17356
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17356
merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106840346
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +63,37 @@ abstract class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106840345
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -382,11 +383,17 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user liujianhuiouc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17208
ok, I will update that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106840206
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1354,9 +1354,8 @@ test_that("column functions", {
# passing option
df <-
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106840169
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/FailureSafeParser.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106840126
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/FailureSafeParser.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74850/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106840034
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -382,11 +383,17 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
thanks, merging to master/2.1/2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
**[Test build #74850 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74850/testReport)**
for PR 17354 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74846/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
**[Test build #74846 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74846/testReport)**
for PR 17274 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
Does it make sense to introduce some counts to decide how many new JoinPlan
we build?
We can find out what we pruned in the search. It can easy for us to ensure
no regression happened
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17356
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74861/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17356
**[Test build #74861 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74861/testReport)**
for PR 17356 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17356
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Thank you @felixcheung, @brkyvz and @maropu.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r106838695
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerSource.scala ---
@@ -26,35 +26,39 @@ private[spark] class BlockManagerSource(val
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
**[Test build #74860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74860/testReport)**
for PR 17354 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74860/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106838506
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1354,9 +1354,8 @@ test_that("column functions", {
# passing option
df <-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74847/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106838434
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1354,9 +1354,8 @@ test_that("column functions", {
# passing option
df <-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74847 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74847/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106838131
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +63,37 @@ abstract class SubqueryExpression(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17358
**[Test build #74863 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74863/testReport)**
for PR 17358 at commit
601 - 635 of 635 matches
Mail list logo
