Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17574
**[Test build #75618 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75618/testReport)**
for PR 17574 at commit
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17574
[SPARK-20264][SQL] asm should be non-test dependency in sql/core
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
sq/core module currently declares asm as a test scope dependency.
Transitively
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569#discussion_r110510848
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -225,20 +225,28 @@ case class Invoke(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569#discussion_r110510800
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -608,7 +616,7 @@ case class MapObjects
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569#discussion_r110510776
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -577,7 +584,7 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569#discussion_r110510779
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -586,7 +593,7 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569#discussion_r110510765
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -356,7 +361,8 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569#discussion_r110510773
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -365,7 +371,8 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r110510575
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2230,6 +2230,8 @@ class Analyzer(
val
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r110510454
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2230,6 +2230,8 @@ class Analyzer(
val
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17573
Thanks! Merging to master/2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17573
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17562
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17562
Thanks! Merging to master/2.1/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17573
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75617/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17573
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17573
**[Test build #75617 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75617/testReport)**
for PR 17573 at commit
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17567
LGTM.
Are there any performance test reports?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75616/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546
**[Test build #75616 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75616/testReport)**
for PR 17546 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
@cloud-fan could you please review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569
@cloud-fan could you please review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17573
[SPARK-20262][SQL] AssertNotNull should throw NullPointerException
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AssertNotNull currently throws RuntimeException. It should throw
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17573
**[Test build #75617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75617/testReport)**
for PR 17573 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546
**[Test build #75616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75616/testReport)**
for PR 17546 at commit
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546#discussion_r110495345
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -736,6 +736,12 @@ object SQLConf {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17469
It seems somethine goes wrong with @holdnk and Jenkins. I think I dont have
a permission to trigger this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17567
**[Test build #3646 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3646/testReport)**
for PR 17567 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
**[Test build #3647 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3647/testReport)**
for PR 17527 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17572
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user vijaykramesh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17572
I'm not sure if I should open my own jira for this issue or if that is
handled by the project maintainers? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user vijaykramesh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17572
String interpolation required for error message
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This error message doesn't get properly formatted because of a missing `s`.
Currently
Github user map222 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17469
@HyukjinKwon Do I need to do something to start the Jenkins test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17570
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17570
Merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75614/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569
**[Test build #75614 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75614/testReport)**
for PR 17569 at commit
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546#discussion_r110480494
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -736,6 +736,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.checkValue(weight =>
Github user Downchuck commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13206
may be fixed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17558
agreed, why would the jar be missing?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17567
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17570
**[Test build #3645 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3645/testReport)**
for PR 17570 at commit
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17546#discussion_r110466604
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -736,6 +736,12 @@ object SQLConf {
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557#discussion_r110465373
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -906,6 +910,24 @@ predicted <- predict(model, df)
head(predicted)
```
+
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
right, tests don't run example anyway...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75610/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
**[Test build #75610 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75610/testReport)**
for PR 17568 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
**[Test build #3647 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3647/testReport)**
for PR 17527 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17567
**[Test build #3646 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3646/testReport)**
for PR 17567 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17567
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75609/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17567
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17567
**[Test build #75609 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75609/testReport)**
for PR 17567 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75615/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
**[Test build #75615 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75615/testReport)**
for PR 17571 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557#discussion_r110459968
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -906,6 +910,24 @@ predicted <- predict(model, df)
head(predicted)
```
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
**[Test build #75613 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75613/testReport)**
for PR 17571 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75613/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
**[Test build #75615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75615/testReport)**
for PR 17571 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571#discussion_r110457676
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/glm.R ---
@@ -44,8 +44,9 @@ gaussianGLM2 <- glm(label ~ features, gaussianDF, family
= "gaussian")
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571#discussion_r110457466
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/glm.R ---
@@ -44,8 +44,9 @@ gaussianGLM2 <- glm(label ~ features, gaussianDF, family
= "gaussian")
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571#discussion_r110457459
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/glm.R ---
@@ -44,8 +44,9 @@ gaussianGLM2 <- glm(label ~ features, gaussianDF, family
= "gaussian")
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
@felixcheung
Just noticed that the current example for logistic regression in the
programming guide did not seem to be a good one. It did not converge using
IRWLS, and Quasi-Newton
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571#discussion_r110457201
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/glm.R ---
@@ -44,8 +44,9 @@ gaussianGLM2 <- glm(label ~ features, gaussianDF, family
= "gaussian")
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
**[Test build #75613 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75613/testReport)**
for PR 17571 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569
**[Test build #75614 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75614/testReport)**
for PR 17569 at commit
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17571
[SPARK-20258][Doc][SparkR] Fix SparkR logistic regression example in
programming guide (did not converge)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkR logistic
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75608/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
**[Test build #75608 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75608/testReport)**
for PR 17527 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17566
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17566
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75607/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17566
**[Test build #75607 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75607/testReport)**
for PR 17566 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
thanks, I find it rather odd but probably by design that the current
directory is different when running `R CMD check .tgz`. will need to look at
the more
---
If your project is set up for
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557#discussion_r110450322
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -906,6 +910,24 @@ predicted <- predict(model, df)
head(predicted)
```
+
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
Got it. LGTM. Thanks for explanation. I'm fine with merging this to master !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17570
**[Test build #3645 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3645/testReport)**
for PR 17570 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17570
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17570
Jenkins, add to whitelist.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17553
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17553
merged to master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17553
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17553
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75612/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17553
**[Test build #75612 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75612/testReport)**
for PR 17553 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
There are two parts to the branch-2.1 fix
First, the reason why the test failed was because `SPARK_HOME` was not set
before calling `spark.install()` when running as a package. This
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17553
**[Test build #75612 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75612/testReport)**
for PR 17553 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17570
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569
**[Test build #75611 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75611/testReport)**
for PR 17569 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75611/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user adrian-ionescu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17570
[SPARK-20255] Move listLeafFiles() to InMemoryFileIndex
## What changes were proposed in this pull request
Trying to get a grip on the `FileIndex` hierarchy, I was confused by the
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17553
Issues fixed. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17569
**[Test build #75611 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75611/testReport)**
for PR 17569 at commit
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
