Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r112370906
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,432 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r112370321
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,432 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17684
Ok, could you write a comment in the code to explain it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r112368956
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,432 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
**[Test build #75969 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75969/testReport)**
for PR 17695 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75969/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r112368367
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,432 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17670#discussion_r112368162
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2606,4 +2607,15 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17670
okay, I'll fix soon. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582
**[Test build #75970 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75970/testReport)**
for PR 17582 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17631
this doesn't seem safe in general. spark treats quotes as a valid part of
the name, eg:
```scala
scala> val df = sc.parallelize(1 to 10).map { x => (x, (x + 1).toLong, (x -
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
**[Test build #75969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75969/testReport)**
for PR 17695 at commit
Github user anabranch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
This should be on hold until a JIRA resolution, I'd like to hear what
others say.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user anabranch opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
[SPARK-20400][DOCS] Remove References to 3rd Party Vendor Tools
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Simple documentation change to remove explicit vendor references.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
**[Test build #75968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75968/testReport)**
for PR 15125 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75968/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582
**[Test build #75967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75967/testReport)**
for PR 17582 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
**[Test build #75968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75968/testReport)**
for PR 15125 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17670
As @jaceklaskowski said, it would be good to fill `numSlices` in the rule
`ResolveTableValuedFunctions`, if it is None.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75964/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
**[Test build #75964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75964/testReport)**
for PR 17680 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17670#discussion_r112366125
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2606,4 +2607,15 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r112365872
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1635,21 +1636,49 @@ def toDF(self, *cols):
return DataFrame(jdf, self.sql_ctx)
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r112365773
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1635,21 +1636,49 @@ def toDF(self, *cols):
return DataFrame(jdf, self.sql_ctx)
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
Can I use the Jenkins test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r112365501
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -182,6 +182,23 @@ def loads(self, obj):
raise NotImplementedError
+class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649
Any update?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17636
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
@BryanCutler Are you going to update this for arrow 0.3?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
Please move ArrowConverters.scala somewhere else that's not top level, e.g.
execution.arrow
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75963/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
**[Test build #75963 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75963/testReport)**
for PR 17680 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
@ericl Ok. Thanks for pointing that. I will try to add the test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674
merged to master. thanks! one step closer to parity
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16781#discussion_r112362704
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/ParquetHiveCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -141,4 +160,326 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75961/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #75961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75961/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16781
@ueshin I've pushed an update which addresses your comments. I also
realized that partitioned tables weren't handled correctly! I fixed that as
well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672#discussion_r112362340
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,43 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16781
**[Test build #75966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75966/testReport)**
for PR 16781 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75962/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
**[Test build #75962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75962/testReport)**
for PR 17680 at commit
Github user umesh9794 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17631
@marmbrus @squito @vanzin , may I ask you to review this PR ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user umesh9794 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17631
@marmbrus @squito @vanzin , may I ask you to review this PR ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17678
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582#discussion_r112358891
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/ApiRootResource.scala ---
@@ -184,14 +184,27 @@ private[v1] class ApiRootResource extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17636
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17636
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75960/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17636
**[Test build #75960 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75960/testReport)**
for PR 17636 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17689#discussion_r112358516
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ trait StreamSourceProvider {
Github user yucai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17678
No, ObjectHashAggregateExec dose not support codegen.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17495
**[Test build #75965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75965/testReport)**
for PR 17495 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17690
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17678
Is there a codegen version we need to worry about?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17690
Thanks - merging in master/branch-2.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
**[Test build #75964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75964/testReport)**
for PR 17680 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17692
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17692
Merging in master/branch-2.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
**[Test build #75963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75963/testReport)**
for PR 17680 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
cc @davies too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
I added a test case so that we make sure it does not push down filters in
`FileFormat` when there are filters with nested column access. For me, I could
not find related test in the test cases
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
**[Test build #75962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75962/testReport)**
for PR 17680 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17694
Please remove the boilerplate message at the end of your PR description.
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17691
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17691
Thanks! Merging to master, 2.2 and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #75961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75961/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650
thanks, merging to master/2.2!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17694
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17480
OK, I will do the work at weekends.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75956/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user vundela opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17694
[SPARK-12717][PYSPARK] Resolving race condition with pyspark broadcasâ¦
â¦ts when using multiple threads
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In pyspark when
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lvdongr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17620
You can see the main method in Master.scala.
def main(argStrings: Array[String]) {
Utils.initDaemon(log)
val conf = new SparkConf
val args = new
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665
**[Test build #75956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75956/testReport)**
for PR 17665 at commit
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
It seems more reasonable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user lvdongr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17620
This happend at the time the previous master leader remove the died worker
,clear the worker's node on persistEngine(we use zookeeper),But before the
worker node was removed from the zookeeper ,the
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
shall we follow `CREATE VIEW` and support both `OR REPLACE` and `IF NOT
EXISTS`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17692
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75959/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17692
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17692
**[Test build #75959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75959/testReport)**
for PR 17692 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680#discussion_r112347873
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -536,4 +537,43 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17691
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17691
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75957/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17691
**[Test build #75957 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75957/testReport)**
for PR 17691 at commit
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
The synax of DBMS like this` CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION `, it means that if
function exists we will replace it, otherwise create one. But i think we'd
better not destroy the original
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467
@budde - thanks for taking time to review it. Appreciate it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112347174
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -249,6 +252,17 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17636
**[Test build #75960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75960/testReport)**
for PR 17636 at commit
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112346805
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -147,6 +152,14 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75958/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
