Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17717
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17717
Thanks! Merging to master and 2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76067 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76067/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17727
Fair enough. Let's do it here. Quoting directly from the code:
> Converts a logical plan into zero or more SparkPlans. This API is
exposed for experimenting with the query planner
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Jenkins retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76066/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76066 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76066/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76065 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76065/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76065/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76066/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76065 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76065/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76064/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76064 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76064/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Jenkins retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76063/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76063/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76064 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76064/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76063 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76063/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76062 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76062/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76062/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76062 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76062/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
[SPARK-20437][R] R wrappers for rollup and cube
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add `roolup` and `cube` methods and corresponding generics.
- Add short
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467
@budde - Not sure if we can exactly test the configured timeouts. I have
debugged the flow in my testcase to verify that the custom values are passed
down to the Kinesis backed block rdd.
---
If
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467
@budde : Implemented review changes and checked scala code style checks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683
Merged to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17719
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76061/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17719
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17727
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17727
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76060/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17719
**[Test build #76061 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76061/testReport)**
for PR 17719 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17727
**[Test build #76060 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76060/testReport)**
for PR 17727 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76059/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
**[Test build #76059 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76059/testReport)**
for PR 17712 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17717
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76058/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17717
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17717
**[Test build #76058 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76058/testReport)**
for PR 17717 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17727
Nothing here explains why you think it's misleading
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17727
**[Test build #76060 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76060/testReport)**
for PR 17727 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17719
**[Test build #76061 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76061/testReport)**
for PR 17719 at commit
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17727
[SQL][MINOR] Remove misleading comment (and tags do better)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Misleading comment removed (and tags do a better job to express
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17719#discussion_r112805934
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -68,6 +68,18 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17726
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user devaraj-kavali opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17726
[SPARK-17928] [Mesos] No driver.memoryOverhead setting for mesos cluster
mode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added a new configuration
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623#discussion_r112805879
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeExtractors.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623#discussion_r112805866
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeExtractors.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623#discussion_r112805843
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695#discussion_r112805801
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -2248,8 +2248,8 @@ should be included on Spark's classpath:
* `hdfs-site.xml`, which provides default behaviors
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
**[Test build #76059 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76059/testReport)**
for PR 17712 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17719#discussion_r112805444
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -96,14 +96,17 @@ def schema(self, schema):
By specifying the schema here, the underlying data
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yangyangyyy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697#discussion_r112805342
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/MLPairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -33,4 +33,16 @@ class MLPairRDDFunctionsSuite extends
Github user yangyangyyy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697#discussion_r112805327
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/MLPairRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -49,6 +49,18 @@ class MLPairRDDFunctions[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713#discussion_r112805110
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/negative-cases/subq-input-typecheck.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+-- The test file
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697#discussion_r112804787
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/MLPairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -33,4 +33,16 @@ class MLPairRDDFunctionsSuite extends
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713#discussion_r112804747
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -414,4 +352,269 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17716#discussion_r112804650
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLViewSuite.scala ---
@@ -160,7 +159,7 @@ abstract class SQLViewSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713#discussion_r112804589
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/negative-cases/subq-input-typecheck.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+-- The test file
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713#discussion_r112804573
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -414,4 +352,269 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17719#discussion_r112804550
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -68,6 +68,18 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697#discussion_r112804479
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/MLPairRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -49,6 +49,18 @@ class MLPairRDDFunctions[K: ClassTag, V:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17719#discussion_r112804528
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -96,14 +96,17 @@ def schema(self, schema):
By specifying the schema here, the underlying
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17697#discussion_r112804455
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/MLPairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -33,4 +33,16 @@ class MLPairRDDFunctionsSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17717
**[Test build #76058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76058/testReport)**
for PR 17717 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17717
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17724
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76055/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17717
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76056/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76057/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17717
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17724#discussion_r112804293
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSessionExtensions.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76054/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
**[Test build #76054 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76054/testReport)**
for PR 17725 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17688
LGTM too. I just quickly checked if there are similar instances but I could
not find and I checked R's one and Scala one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
gentle ping @liancheng and @davies.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17724#discussion_r112803968
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -848,6 +851,17 @@ object SparkSession {
}
/**
101 - 186 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
