Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76158 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76158/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
[`0da03b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76158/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17605
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17605
**[Test build #76161 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76161/testReport)**
for PR 17605 at commit
[`3254f8e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17605
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76161/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17605
**[Test build #76164 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76164/testReport)**
for PR 17605 at commit
[`9d75094`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
**[Test build #76163 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76163/testReport)**
for PR 17765 at commit
[`bd13a01`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bd
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76152/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
**[Test build #76152 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76152/testReport)**
for PR 17765 at commit
[`07e182b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17761
@zsxwing Got it, thanks for clarifying.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
**[Test build #76162 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76162/testReport)**
for PR 17765 at commit
[`609d50e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/60
Github user redsanket commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
**[Test build #76160 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76160/testReport)**
for PR 17765 at commit
[`bd13a01`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bd
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17605
**[Test build #76161 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76161/testReport)**
for PR 17605 at commit
[`3254f8e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/32
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17755
Thanks @vanzin .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user jerryshao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17755
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76151/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
**[Test build #76151 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76151/testReport)**
for PR 17763 at commit
[`2bb83e1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17605
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76159/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17605
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17605
**[Test build #76159 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76159/testReport)**
for PR 17605 at commit
[`4b8a352`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76158 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76158/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
[`0da03b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17605
**[Test build #76159 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76159/testReport)**
for PR 17605 at commit
[`4b8a352`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4b
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17761
@mridulm this only affect codes calling `runUninterruptibly` which is not a
public API, so won't break any existing codes. The worst case of this PR is
some task needs to wait until network timeout.
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Jenkins retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76155 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76155/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
[`0da03b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
**[Test build #76157 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76157/testReport)**
for PR 17596 at commit
[`7f41155`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76155/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17724
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17761
Task interruption is part of our API iirc - kill with interrupt = true.
Doing this will break that contract - did I miss something here ?
Also, IIRC @joshrosen had done a bunch of work re
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17724
Thanks! Merging to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17724
Can we add SQL to pr title ? Extension to spark implies core, and means
something different :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user sujith71955 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649
@gatorsmile @wzhfy updated the PR by removing the 'comment' from table
properties .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
**[Test build #76156 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76156/testReport)**
for PR 17725 at commit
[`80e40ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/80
Github user markgrover commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
Kicking off another run here while I am running a run locally.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user markgrover commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17737#discussion_r113339040
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -251,15 +285,16 @@ def __iter__(self):
# string methods
_rlike_doc = """
-Retur
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76155 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76155/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
[`0da03b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0d
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
EOW, maybe.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
Thanks, do you have an approx. ETA? Knowing that will help me not ping you
too much.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17766
@JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17673
I can maybe help out a bit in a week and a bit (I've also done some poking
inside of Word2Vec) but I need to wrap up some travel and Python stuff first.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
Really busy with all sorts of things, will get to it eventually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17766
**[Test build #76154 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76154/testReport)**
for PR 17766 at commit
[`d16be2b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d1
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17766
[SPARK-20421][core] Mark internal listeners as deprecated.
These listeners weren't really meant for external consumption, but they're
public and marked with @DeveloperApi. Adding the deprecated t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17693
**[Test build #76153 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76153/testReport)**
for PR 17693 at commit
[`91bb487`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/91
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
Hi @vanzin. Any thoughts on this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17762
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17762
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76148/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17762
**[Test build #76148 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76148/testReport)**
for PR 17762 at commit
[`550c2d8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user markgrover commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
Hmm, this is weird, it ran for 4h10 mins and got killed due to a timeout.
Looking...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
**[Test build #76152 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76152/testReport)**
for PR 17765 at commit
[`07e182b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/07
GitHub user kunalkhamar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
[SPARK-20464][SS] Add a job group and an informative description for
streaming queries
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change makes it convenient to group the
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17748
LGTM, can you please merge it Tom ? Thx
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17755
Merging to 2.1 / 2.0. Please close the PR manually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17748#discussion_r113325881
--- Diff:
common/network-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/yarn/YarnShuffleService.java
---
@@ -363,25 +362,29 @@ protected File initRecoveryDb(S
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76143/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17725
**[Test build #76143 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76143/testReport)**
for PR 17725 at commit
[`80e40ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17744#discussion_r113323069
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -93,14 +92,25 @@ protected void h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17761
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17761
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76145/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17761
**[Test build #76145 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76145/testReport)**
for PR 17761 at commit
[`bde6120`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17764
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user ptkool opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17764
Add new function isNotDistinctFrom.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expose the SPARK SQL <=> operator in PySpark as a column function.
## How was this patch test
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
**[Test build #76151 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76151/testReport)**
for PR 17763 at commit
[`2bb83e1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17724
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17724
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76146/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17724
**[Test build #76146 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76146/testReport)**
for PR 17724 at commit
[`72b9cab`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
**[Test build #76150 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76150/testReport)**
for PR 17763 at commit
[`f10461b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76150/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
**[Test build #76150 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76150/testReport)**
for PR 17763 at commit
[`f10461b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17761
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76144/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17761
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17761
**[Test build #76144 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76144/testReport)**
for PR 17761 at commit
[`3d7fc4d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76149/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
**[Test build #76149 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76149/testReport)**
for PR 17763 at commit
[`e79a05a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
**[Test build #76149 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76149/testReport)**
for PR 17763 at commit
[`e79a05a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e7
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
[SPARK-13747][Core]Add ThreadUtils.awaitReady and disallow Await.ready
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `ThreadUtils.awaitReady` similar to `ThreadUtils.awaitResult`
Github user redsanket commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
ok will add it to either RuntimeInfo or ApplicationInfo. I thought it might
break the contract underneath but if it doesn't then I should add it here
thanks for the input. Will do
---
If your pr
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
Adding fields to API types is ok. It doesn't break the contract.
Adding this in the configuration is weird, because it's not a config.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user redsanket commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
@vanzin Can I add this to SparkConf.scala
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala#L58
just to have the application info here it will have t
Github user redsanket commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658#discussion_r113299115
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ApplicationEventListener.scala
---
@@ -57,4 +58,10 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationEventListe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17762
**[Test build #76148 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76148/testReport)**
for PR 17762 at commit
[`550c2d8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/55
Github user redsanket commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658#discussion_r113298757
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ApplicationEventListener.scala
---
@@ -57,4 +58,10 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationEventListe
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17762
Jenkins, ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17762
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user jsoltren opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17762
[SPARK-9103][WIP] Track Netty memory usage - take two
This patch resurrects #7753 by liyezhang556520 and #17625 by jsoltren.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Me
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76147/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76147 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76147/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
[`c3ebeba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user vundela commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17694
Thanks for your time @holdenk.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17694
Interesting, I don't think I have all of the required context to review,
but I'll try and take a look this weekend (I've got some other things happening
this week already).
---
If your project is
Github user vundela commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17694
cc @holdenk
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
101 - 200 of 329 matches
Mail list logo
