Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78851/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388#discussion_r124716883
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/protocol/OpenBlocksFailed.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
**[Test build #78851 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78851/testReport)**
for PR 17471 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
**[Test build #78869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78869/testReport)**
for PR 18458 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78868 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78868/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
retest this plesae
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78867 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78867/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458#discussion_r124716253
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2156,28 +2178,23 @@ setMethod("date_format", signature(y = "Column", x
= "character"),
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388#discussion_r124715952
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -90,16 +96,28 @@ protected void
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78866 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78866/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388#discussion_r124715302
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/TransportConf.java
---
@@ -257,4 +257,31 @@ public Properties cryptoConf() {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18450
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18450
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78853/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388#discussion_r124715080
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/PooledByteBufAllocatorWithMetrics.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458#discussion_r124715019
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2156,28 +2178,23 @@ setMethod("date_format", signature(y = "Column", x
= "character"),
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18450
**[Test build #78853 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78853/testReport)**
for PR 18450 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78863/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78863 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78863/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r124714544
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/metric/SQLMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -267,10 +298,111 @@ class SQLMetricsSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18448
**[Test build #78865 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78865/testReport)**
for PR 18448 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
@viirya ok let's add it back
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r124714354
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/TungstenAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -367,6 +367,22 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78859/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18448#discussion_r124714226
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -132,6 +132,27 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(as.data.frame(Titanic, stringsAsFactors = FALSE))}
NULL
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
**[Test build #78859 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78859/testReport)**
for PR 18301 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18448#discussion_r124714065
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -132,6 +132,27 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(as.data.frame(Titanic, stringsAsFactors = FALSE))}
NULL
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78861 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78861/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78861/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
**[Test build #78864 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78864/testReport)**
for PR 18405 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78860/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78860/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416#discussion_r124712549
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetPrimitiveSuite.scala ---
@@ -339,6 +340,28 @@ class DatasetPrimitiveSuite extends QueryTest
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416#discussion_r124712535
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -834,6 +834,140 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
@rxin I just revert it in previous commits. @cloud-fan should I revert it
back?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78863 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78863/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
hey i didn't track super closely, but it is pretty important to show at
least one more digit, e.g. 1.7, rather than just 2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
**[Test build #78862 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78862/testReport)**
for PR 18301 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78861 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78861/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78860 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78860/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78857/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78857 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78857/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78852/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r124710724
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/metric/SQLMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -163,29 +178,45 @@ class SQLMetricsSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
**[Test build #78852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78852/testReport)**
for PR 18405 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r124710649
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/TungstenAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -367,6 +367,22 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78858/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78858 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78858/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user JackYangzg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18435
@jerryshao Ok
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r124709997
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/metric/SQLMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -163,29 +178,45 @@ class SQLMetricsSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r124710004
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/metric/SQLMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -163,29 +178,45 @@ class SQLMetricsSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r124709371
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/TungstenAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -367,6 +367,22 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r124709196
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/TungstenAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -367,6 +367,22 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r124709173
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/TungstenAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -367,6 +367,22 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78856/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
Hmm, I guess we need #16056 to fix nullability of `StaticInvoke`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
**[Test build #78856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78856/testReport)**
for PR 18458 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18448
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18448
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78854/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18448
**[Test build #78854 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78854/testReport)**
for PR 18448 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78855/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422
**[Test build #78855 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78855/testReport)**
for PR 18422 at commit
Github user zenglinxi0615 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
@jerryshao actually, this threading issue cause an infinite loop when we
restart historyserver and replaying event logs of spark apps. you can see the
jstack log in attachments of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
**[Test build #78859 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78859/testReport)**
for PR 18301 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
**[Test build #78858 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78858/testReport)**
for PR 18463 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458#discussion_r124706483
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2156,28 +2178,23 @@ setMethod("date_format", signature(y = "Column", x
= "character"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458#discussion_r124706890
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -132,6 +132,35 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(as.data.frame(Titanic, stringsAsFactors = FALSE))}
NULL
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458#discussion_r124706681
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2156,28 +2178,23 @@ setMethod("date_format", signature(y = "Column", x
= "character"),
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
Apparently, I can only reproduce this with Jenkins for now.
I tested them on the environments below:
- CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) / R version 3.4.0 / Java(TM) SE
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78848/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
**[Test build #78848 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78848/testReport)**
for PR 18301 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18463
[WIP][SPARK-21093][R] Terminate R's worker processes in the parent of R's
daemon to prevent a leak
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a retry for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78857 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78857/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18448#discussion_r124706110
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -132,6 +132,27 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(as.data.frame(Titanic, stringsAsFactors = FALSE))}
NULL
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18448#discussion_r124706139
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -132,6 +132,27 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(as.data.frame(Titanic, stringsAsFactors = FALSE))}
NULL
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78849/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
**[Test build #78849 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78849/testReport)**
for PR 13873 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422#discussion_r124705885
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -132,23 +132,40 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(as.data.frame(Titanic, stringsAsFactors = FALSE))}
NULL
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422#discussion_r124705377
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -824,32 +835,23 @@ setMethod("initcap",
column(jc)
})
-#' is.nan
-#'
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422#discussion_r124704884
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3554,21 +3493,17 @@ setMethod("grouping_id",
column(jc)
})
-#'
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422#discussion_r124705740
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -132,23 +132,40 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(as.data.frame(Titanic, stringsAsFactors = FALSE))}
NULL
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422#discussion_r124704722
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -132,23 +132,40 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(as.data.frame(Titanic, stringsAsFactors = FALSE))}
NULL
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422#discussion_r124705490
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -132,23 +132,40 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(as.data.frame(Titanic, stringsAsFactors = FALSE))}
NULL
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422#discussion_r124705601
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -132,23 +132,40 @@ NULL
#' df <- createDataFrame(as.data.frame(Titanic, stringsAsFactors = FALSE))}
NULL
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18449
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
1 - 100 of 765 matches
Mail list logo
