Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19099
**[Test build #81299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81299/testReport)**
for PR 19099 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19099
cc @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19060
Previous parquet link is broken. The official one is
https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/blob/master/parquet-hadoop/src/test/java/org/apache/parquet/hadoop/example/TestInputOutputFormat.java
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19099
[SPARK-21652][SQL] Fix rule confliction between InferFiltersFromConstraints
and ConstantPropagation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For the given example below,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19060
**[Test build #81298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81298/testReport)**
for PR 19060 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r136457345
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -120,6 +120,33 @@ class CrossValidatorSuite
}
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r136456379
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -120,6 +120,33 @@ class CrossValidatorSuite
}
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082#discussion_r136455832
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -244,6 +246,92 @@ case class HashAggregateExec(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18883#discussion_r136451595
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,10 @@ object MimaExcludes {
// [SPARK-19937] Add remote bytes read to disk.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19097
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19097
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18883#discussion_r136450775
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,10 @@ object MimaExcludes {
// [SPARK-19937] Add remote bytes read to disk.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18883#discussion_r136448647
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,10 @@ object MimaExcludes {
// [SPARK-19937] Add remote bytes read to disk.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
**[Test build #81297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81297/testReport)**
for PR 18975 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81293/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098
**[Test build #81293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81293/testReport)**
for PR 19098 at commit
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136443263
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/InsertIntoDataSourceDirCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18883#discussion_r136443138
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,10 @@ object MimaExcludes {
// [SPARK-19937] Add remote bytes read to disk.
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136439466
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertSuite.scala ---
@@ -534,4 +534,83 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extends QueryTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19097
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19097
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81292/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19097
**[Test build #81292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81292/testReport)**
for PR 19097 at commit
Github user aray commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18306#discussion_r136436631
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -562,6 +563,8 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
}
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136436585
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertSuite.scala ---
@@ -534,4 +534,83 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extends QueryTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19089
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19089
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81290/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098
The asserts are wrong if this can be called from user code. It should be
`require`. The reason is, basically, exactly this. If you don't have assertions
on this argument is accepted.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19089
**[Test build #81290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81290/testReport)**
for PR 19089 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19093
**[Test build #81296 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81296/testReport)**
for PR 19093 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81291/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19093
LGTM pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
**[Test build #81291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81291/testReport)**
for PR 18975 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19093
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098
@srowen , the assertion is from the Spark `ColumnarBatch`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18704
**[Test build #81295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81295/testReport)**
for PR 18704 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098#discussion_r136427951
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1308,10 +1308,6 @@ class
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19093
I'm ok with this change
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818
**[Test build #81294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81294/testReport)**
for PR 18818 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18692
Sorry for the delay. @jiangxb1987 will submit a simple fix for the issue
you mentioned. That will not be a perfect fix but it partially resolve the
issue. In the future, we need to move the
Github user aokolnychyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18692
@gatorsmile what is our decision here? Shall we wait until SPARK-21652 is
resolved? In the meantime, I can add some tests and see how the proposed rule
works together with all others.
---
If
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818
LGTM except one comment. Thanks for working on it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user aray commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818#discussion_r136421644
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -582,6 +582,7 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136421034
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/InsertIntoDataSourceDirCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user aray commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19080#discussion_r136419947
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/physical/partitioning.scala
---
@@ -284,24 +241,17 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818#discussion_r136419981
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -582,6 +582,7 @@ class
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136419843
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveDirCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136418390
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveStrategies.scala ---
@@ -155,6 +156,9 @@ object HiveAnalysis extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136418037
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -140,6 +141,9 @@ case class
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136417593
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -1509,4 +1509,84 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818#discussion_r136416655
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -582,6 +582,7 @@ class
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098
Hm, I wonder how that results in an assertion? that's a normal error case
and shouldn't cause an assert. Is it from a third-party library in this case,
like Arrow? really we should fix that somehow
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098
LGTM. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098#discussion_r136413800
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1308,10 +1308,6 @@ class
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r136413085
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1261,4 +1264,55 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098
**[Test build #81293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81293/testReport)**
for PR 19098 at commit
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19098
[SPARK-21583][HOTFIX] Removed intercept in test causing failures
Removing a check in the ColumnarBatchSuite that depended on a Java
assertion. This assertion is being compiled out in the
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18306#discussion_r136410312
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -562,6 +563,8 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r136409601
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1261,4 +1264,55 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18697
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81286/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18697
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18697
**[Test build #81286 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81286/testReport)**
for PR 18697 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r136408878
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1261,4 +1264,55 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r136408531
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1261,4 +1264,55 @@ class
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r136408063
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1261,4 +1264,55 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r136407451
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1261,4 +1264,55 @@ class
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r136406559
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1261,4 +1264,55 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18837
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81289/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
**[Test build #81289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81289/testReport)**
for PR 18270 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18837
There are still some small issues (minor style nits, duplicating conf keys
instead of using `CONSTANT.key`), but well. I can't really comment on the
functionality itself so I'll trust your guys'
Github user smurching commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
@WeichenXu123 That approach sounds reasonable to me.
My main thought (& this might be obvious) is on the implementation level --
as long as we implement this by adding an
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r136404583
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1261,4 +1264,55 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19097
**[Test build #81292 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81292/testReport)**
for PR 19097 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19097
[SPARK-17107][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Remove redundant pushdown rule for Union
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Also remove useless function `partitionByDeterministic` after the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19072
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19072
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81283/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19072
**[Test build #81283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81283/testReport)**
for PR 19072 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
Hi, @marmbrus , @liancheng , @yhuai .
Could you give me some advice about this ORC upgrade PR?
I tried to minimize the diff of PR, so I didn't remove the unused old one.
Thank you
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
@jaceklaskowski Maybe you can fix the PR title next time. Thanks for your
work!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19065
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81288/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19065
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19065
**[Test build #81288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81288/testReport)**
for PR 19065 at commit
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
That was really quick! Thanks a lot @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
**[Test build #81291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81291/testReport)**
for PR 18975 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81287/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19089
**[Test build #81290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81290/testReport)**
for PR 19089 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538
**[Test build #81287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81287/testReport)**
for PR 18538 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81285/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
**[Test build #81285 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81285/testReport)**
for PR 19078 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
**[Test build #81289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81289/testReport)**
for PR 18270 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
That commit is the code changes I suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
101 - 200 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
