Github user jmchung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
@gatorsmile Thanks for your feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
**[Test build #81352 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81352/testReport)**
for PR 19110 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19018
cc @felixcheung
I encounter RTest failed again even when this seed added.
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81350/console
error:
```
Failed
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81350/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270#discussion_r136708766
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -954,6 +954,15 @@ class Analyzer(
try {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270#discussion_r136708762
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -863,6 +854,15 @@ class Analyzer(
case q:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
**[Test build #81350 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81350/testReport)**
for PR 19110 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865#discussion_r136708714
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
package
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865#discussion_r136708708
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -2034,4 +2034,31 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270#discussion_r136708657
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -954,6 +954,15 @@ class Analyzer(
try {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81347/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
**[Test build #81347 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81347/testReport)**
for PR 18869 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
**[Test build #81351 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81351/testReport)**
for PR 19082 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270#discussion_r136708299
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/group-analytics.sql.out ---
@@ -223,12 +223,19 @@ grouping_id() can only be used with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
**[Test build #81350 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81350/testReport)**
for PR 19110 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18281
I take this PR over in #19110 because the original author is busy but we
need merge this PR soon.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865#discussion_r136708174
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -114,6 +114,17 @@ class JsonFileFormat
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
[SPARK-21027][ML][PYTHON] Added tunable parallelism to one vs. rest in both
Scala mllib and Pyspark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added tunable parallelism to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
**[Test build #81349 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81349/testReport)**
for PR 18869 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
**[Test build #81348 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81348/testReport)**
for PR 18869 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
**[Test build #81347 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81347/testReport)**
for PR 18869 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136706616
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -178,11 +179,50 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136706593
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -178,11 +179,50 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
Thanks for notification. Actually we implement the same logic with hive,
though there's a bug ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81346/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
**[Test build #81346 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81346/testReport)**
for PR 18975 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869#discussion_r136706140
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/predicate-functions.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+-- In
+select 1 in(1, 2, 3);
+select 1
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869#discussion_r136706025
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/predicate-functions.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+-- In
--- End diff --
The test cases
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
**[Test build #81346 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81346/testReport)**
for PR 18975 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869#discussion_r136704544
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/predicate-functions.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+-- In
--- End diff --
Let me
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869#discussion_r136704469
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/predicate-functions.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+-- In
+select 1 in(1, 2, 3);
+select 1
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869#discussion_r136704438
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/predicate-functions.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+-- In
--- End diff --
If we do not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19100
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19109#discussion_r136702130
--- Diff: docs/index.md ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ source, visit [Building Spark](building-spark.html).
Spark runs on both Windows and UNIX-like
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19109
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user demoonism opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19109
Update index.md
Change wording to avoid confusion
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change the wording in the installation doc to avoid confusion
## How was
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81345/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
**[Test build #81345 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81345/testReport)**
for PR 18270 at commit
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
@jinxing64 I think you may revert the changes in Spark, and use the same
logic of grouping__id as hive. Keep the wrong result consistently as hive did.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
**[Test build #81345 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81345/testReport)**
for PR 18270 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19106
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19106
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81344/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19106
**[Test build #81344 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81344/testReport)**
for PR 19106 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19108
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19108
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81343/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19108
**[Test build #81343 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81343/testReport)**
for PR 19108 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81342/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
**[Test build #81342 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81342/testReport)**
for PR 18270 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19106
**[Test build #81344 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81344/testReport)**
for PR 19106 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19106#discussion_r136696592
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/ProbabilisticClassifier.scala
---
@@ -245,6 +245,13 @@ private[ml] object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19108
**[Test build #81343 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81343/testReport)**
for PR 19108 at commit
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19108
[SPARK-21898][ML] Feature parity for KolmogorovSmirnovTest in MLlib
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Feature parity for KolmogorovSmirnovTest in MLlib.
Github user minixalpha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19090
I design two groups test cases:
- Test cases about windows command scripts options
- Examples in Spark Document
All these test cases works well.
## Test cases
Github user jmchung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
@viirya Thanks, the description of PR has been updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
**[Test build #81342 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81342/testReport)**
for PR 18270 at commit
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
@gatorsmile I had already tried to resolve grouping__id in
ResolveFunctions. But ResolveFunctions is behind ResolveGroupingAnalytics.
grouping__id may change in ResolveGroupingAnalytics.
---
If
Github user cenyuhai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270#discussion_r136695110
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/group-analytics.sql.out ---
@@ -223,12 +223,19 @@ grouping_id() can only be used with
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270#discussion_r136694895
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/group-analytics.sql.out ---
@@ -223,12 +223,19 @@ grouping_id() can only be used with
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
why failed? Couldn't I add order byï¼
```java
org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: Expected "...Y CUBE(course,
year)[ ORDER BY grouping__id, course, year]", but got "...Y
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
@jmchung Please also update the description too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81340/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
**[Test build #81340 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81340/testReport)**
for PR 18865 at commit
Github user heary-cao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19106#discussion_r136692759
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/ProbabilisticClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ import
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105#discussion_r136692400
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2714,6 +2714,40 @@ setMethod("unionAll",
union(x, y)
})
+#' Return a new
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105
**[Test build #81341 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81341/testReport)**
for PR 19105 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81341/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105
**[Test build #81341 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81341/testReport)**
for PR 19105 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19106#discussion_r136691526
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/ProbabilisticClassifier.scala
---
@@ -245,6 +245,13 @@ private[ml] object
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105
Oh, yea. I made a mistake during copying and pasting the example in the
description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105#discussion_r136691380
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2714,6 +2714,40 @@ setMethod("unionAll",
union(x, y)
})
+#' Return a new
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105#discussion_r136691370
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2714,6 +2714,40 @@ setMethod("unionAll",
union(x, y)
})
+#' Return a new
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19105
do you mean for your example in the PR description something different?
it says
```
head(union(limit(df1, 2), limit(df2, 2)))
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014#discussion_r136691195
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -304,16 +304,14 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
override def
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
**[Test build #81340 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81340/testReport)**
for PR 18865 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81338/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
**[Test build #81338 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81338/testReport)**
for PR 18975 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81339/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
**[Test build #81339 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81339/testReport)**
for PR 18865 at commit
Github user jmchung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
Thanks @viirya's suggestion, the redundant comment is removed and
`withTempPath` is applied in the test case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
**[Test build #81339 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81339/testReport)**
for PR 18865 at commit
92 matches
Mail list logo
