Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19119
Sure
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116#discussion_r136905307
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -163,14 +163,15 @@ object SparkBuild extends PomBuild {
val configUrlV =
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
I am not opposing the solution of the staging directory, but just want to
understand what kind of services we can guarantee.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
Even renaming staging location is not atomic, right? Hive users might still
see the extra data during the rename, right?
I am not sure how Hive works. If our underlying system is Linux,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116#discussion_r136904086
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -163,14 +163,15 @@ object SparkBuild extends PomBuild {
val configUrlV =
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116#discussion_r136903766
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -163,14 +163,15 @@ object SparkBuild extends PomBuild {
val configUrlV =
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19116
**[Test build #81397 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81397/testReport)**
for PR 19116 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19128
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user sphinx-jiang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19128
Merge pull request #1 from apache/master
9.5 update
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19111
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81395/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19111
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19111
**[Test build #81395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81395/testReport)**
for PR 19111 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082#discussion_r136900835
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -244,6 +246,89 @@ case class HashAggregateExec(
501 - 514 of 514 matches
Mail list logo
