Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19816
**[Test build #84171 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84171/testReport)**
for PR 19816 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19818
**[Test build #84174 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84174/testReport)**
for PR 19818 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
FYI, I believe the test failures are from SPARK-22595, which is fixed now.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19818
cc @kiszk @viirya @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19818#discussion_r153004995
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -413,16 +399,12 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19818
[SPARK-22604][SQL] remove the get address methods from ColumnVector
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`nullsNativeAddress` and `valuesNativeAddress` are only used in
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19814
I think we should document this in read side too if we are going to do and
actually I think it's not intended as the thirdparty one does not allow empty
string IIRC. Will take a closer look
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19816
I expect 10 ~ 15 minutes decrease. Let me wait the results before cc'ing
someone to review.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19817
**[Test build #84173 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84173/testReport)**
for PR 19817 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19816
Build started: [SparkR] `ALL`
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19817
[SPARK-22603][SQL] Fix 64KB JVM bytecode limit problem with FormatString
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `FormatString` code generation to place generated
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19815
**[Test build #84172 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84172/testReport)**
for PR 19815 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19816#discussion_r153001382
--- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -3078,101 +3091,117 @@ test_that("coalesce, repartition, numPartitions",
{
})
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19816#discussion_r153001109
--- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -3021,41 +3021,54 @@ test_that("dapplyCollect() on DataFrame with a
binary column", {
})
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19816#discussion_r153001070
--- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -3078,101 +3091,117 @@ test_that("coalesce, repartition, numPartitions",
{
})
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19816#discussion_r153000843
--- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -3021,41 +3021,54 @@ test_that("dapplyCollect() on DataFrame with a
binary column", {
})
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19816
This one is the last where I am seeing kind of hanging in few specific
tests. I think I need AppVeyor tests to see the actual elapsed time diff.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19816
**[Test build #84171 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84171/testReport)**
for PR 19816 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19816
[WIP][SPARK-21693][FOLLOWUP][R] Reduce shuffle partitions running R worker
in few tests to speed up
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup to reduce
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19815
**[Test build #84170 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84170/testReport)**
for PR 19815 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19815
cc @michal-databricks @kiszk @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19815
[SPARK-22602][SQL] remove ColumnVector#loadBytes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`ColumnVector#loadBytes` is only used as an optimization for reading
UTF8String in
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19814
As I've seen the univocity library does not support explicit quote turn off
feature on the write side.
---
-
To
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19518
In int case, the followings are the number of java byte code length for a
value
1 byte: -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (iconst_?)
2 byte: -128 ~ -2, 6 ~ 127 (bipush)
3 bytes: -32768 ~ -129, 128
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
**[Test build #84169 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84169/testReport)**
for PR 19811 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19518
The PR looks good.
Although it can solve the constant pool pressure, however, I have a
question. Does it mean every time a constant falling in short range is used in
codes, we increase 1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19752
**[Test build #84168 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84168/testReport)**
for PR 19752 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19752
@gatorsmile I added a test case to check that the execution plan is
`WholeStageCodegenExec` as expected. I also made some performance test using
almost the same code, ie.:
```
val N = 30
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19756#discussion_r152992616
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/QueryExecution.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ class QueryExecution(val sparkSession:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84167/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
**[Test build #84167 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84167/testReport)**
for PR 19811 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
**[Test build #84167 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84167/testReport)**
for PR 19811 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19814
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user gaborgsomogyi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19814
[SPARK-22484][DOC] Document PySpark DataFrame csv writer behavior wheâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PySpark API Document, DataFrame.write.csv() says that
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84165/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788
**[Test build #84165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84165/testReport)**
for PR 19788 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19773
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84164/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19773
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19773
**[Test build #84164 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84164/testReport)**
for PR 19773 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19518
Here is [a PR](https://github.com/janino-compiler/janino/pull/34) to fix a
problem regarding `sipush`.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84163/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
**[Test build #84163 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84163/testReport)**
for PR 19811 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19756
Do you mean we manually run `ReuseExchange` after the registration of
exchanges?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788
think about shuffle as a server-client framework, does your change need to
update the server side? i.e. do users need to upgrade their external shuffle
service for new spark version with this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788#discussion_r152980151
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockId.scala ---
@@ -52,8 +52,9 @@ case class RDDBlockId(rddId: Int, splitIndex: Int)
extends
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788
Also cc @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788#discussion_r152976816
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockResolverSuite.java
---
@@ -110,6 +110,13 @@ public
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788#discussion_r152976135
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockResolver.java
---
@@ -165,13 +165,23 @@ public
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788#discussion_r152976754
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockResolverSuite.java
---
@@ -110,6 +110,13 @@ public
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788#discussion_r152978408
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockId.scala ---
@@ -52,8 +52,9 @@ case class RDDBlockId(rddId: Int, splitIndex: Int)
extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18424
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user Jiri-Kremser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19802
To explain better the intentions, it doesn't try to solve of somehow
provide a compatibility layer between old and new versions of Spark, all it
does is slightly improving the UX, because
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19786
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763
thanks, merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ferdonline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19805
cc @andrewor14 since I believe you know this part of spark pretty well,
maybe you could help me integrating this.
Any idea why Jenkins didn't start the testing?
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19786
thanks, merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84161/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763
**[Test build #84161 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84161/testReport)**
for PR 19763 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19756
can we run `ReuseExchange` twice?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19786
ping @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19518
Next, I analyzed usage of constant pool entries and java bytecode ops using
`janinoc`. The summary is as follows:
```
array[4] : 6 + 0 * n entries, 6-8 java bytecode ops / read access
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
**[Test build #84166 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84166/testReport)**
for PR 19808 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84159/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
**[Test build #84159 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84159/testReport)**
for PR 19808 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84160/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
**[Test build #84160 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84160/testReport)**
for PR 19808 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19518
First of all, I have to share sad news with you. `janino` does not use
`sipush` for values from 128 to 32767. Current `janino` 3.0.7 uses `iconst...`,
`bipush`, or `ldc`. `javac` uses `sipush` for
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19756
The exchanges only register with `ExchangeCoordinator` after query
transformation. So during transformation, we don't know if two
`ExchangeCoordinator` have the same exchanges.
---
Github user yucai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788#discussion_r152962372
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/IndexShuffleBlockResolver.scala ---
@@ -196,12 +196,14 @@ private[spark] class
Github user yucai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788#discussion_r152961094
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/IndexShuffleBlockResolver.scala ---
@@ -196,12 +196,14 @@ private[spark] class
Github user Jiri-Kremser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19802#discussion_r152960380
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/TransportRequestHandler.java
---
@@ -206,6 +207,11 @@ public void
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788
**[Test build #84165 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84165/testReport)**
for PR 19788 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19802#discussion_r152959040
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/TransportRequestHandler.java
---
@@ -206,6 +207,11 @@ public void
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
**[Test build #84163 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84163/testReport)**
for PR 19811 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19773
**[Test build #84164 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84164/testReport)**
for PR 19773 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84157/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user Jiri-Kremser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19802
> Can you please explain more, and how to reproduce this issue?
Sure,
1. Start master and worker (in version 2.2.0 for instance):
```bash
cat ./python/pyspark/version.py
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
**[Test build #84157 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84157/testReport)**
for PR 19808 at commit
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19773#discussion_r152957444
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -318,16 +318,26 @@ case class AlterTableChangeColumnCommand(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84162/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
**[Test build #84162 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84162/testReport)**
for PR 19789 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808#discussion_r152953457
--- Diff: bin/spark-sql.cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+@echo off
+
+rem
+rem Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
**[Test build #84162 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84162/testReport)**
for PR 19789 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
cc @zsxwing
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user daroo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789#discussion_r152951885
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka010/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ private[spark] class KafkaRDD[K, V](
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808#discussion_r152951398
--- Diff: bin/spark-sql.cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+@echo off
+
+rem
+rem Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808#discussion_r152947466
--- Diff: bin/spark-sql.cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+@echo off
+
+rem
+rem Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84156/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19808
**[Test build #84156 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84156/testReport)**
for PR 19808 at commit
101 - 200 of 282 matches
Mail list logo
