Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #85003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85003/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
[SPARK-22815] [SQL] Keep PromotePrecision in Optimized Plans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We could get incorrect results by running DecimalPrecision twice.
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
I noticed that, in the current master, spark throws an exception in runtime
if type mismatches between a given partition column type and an actual column;
```
scala> jdbcTable.show
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r157337791
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -99,6 +103,16 @@ private[sql] object
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r157337772
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -45,13 +45,51 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19985#discussion_r157337721
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamSuite.scala ---
@@ -418,6 +418,35 @@ class StreamSuite extends StreamTest {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19985#discussion_r157337723
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamSuite.scala ---
@@ -418,6 +418,35 @@ class StreamSuite extends StreamTest {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19985
**[Test build #85002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85002/testReport)**
for PR 19985 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
**[Test build #85001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85001/testReport)**
for PR 19594 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user MikhailErofeev commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19978
@squito
Your guess was right, and I can remove these blocks by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20923. I will test the performance
after this patch and refine or close the
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
plz update the doc in `DataFrameRaeder`
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/0c8fca4608643ed9e1eb3ae8620e6f4f6a017a87/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala#L248
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
**[Test build #85000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85000/testReport)**
for PR 19977 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19998
**[Test build #84999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84999/testReport)**
for PR 19998 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19998
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19998
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19998
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84997/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84996/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19981
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19998
**[Test build #84997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84997/testReport)**
for PR 19998 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
**[Test build #84996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84996/testReport)**
for PR 19977 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19981
**[Test build #84994 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84994/testReport)**
for PR 19981 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19981
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84994/
Test FAILed.
---
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
