Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20034
thanks, merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20036
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20036#discussion_r158753678
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ class CodegenContext
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20075
**[Test build #85417 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85417/testReport)**
for PR 20075 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20075
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85417/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20075
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user Ngone51 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20056
It seems something wrong while testing 'ReplayListenerSuite':
```
[info] ReplayListenerSuite:
[info] - Simple replay (97 milliseconds)
[info] - Replay compressed inprogress log file
Github user MJFND commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14658
Okay, but even if not then increasing the number of shuffle partition
should fix it, but its not.
On Dec 26, 2017 8:51 PM, "Guoqiang Li" wrote:
> Spark
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14658
Spark 2.2 has fixed this issue.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20036#discussion_r158752728
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala
---
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ case class InputAdapter(child:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18906
Right, let's go ahead. Please let me know anyone has an explicit objection
for this one.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
Do we have to sacrifice one of them? If we do then I agree deeply nested
expression is more common than a long chain of arithmetic expressions and we
should get this patch. I think we should
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18906#discussion_r158752315
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+
--- End diff --
Let's remove this line
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18906
**[Test build #85419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85419/testReport)**
for PR 18906 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18906
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20082#discussion_r158752147
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -95,7 +95,10 @@ object MimaExcludes {
// [SPARK-21087] CrossValidator, TrainValidationSplit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158751974
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GenerateExec.scala ---
@@ -57,19 +59,15 @@ private[execution] sealed case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158751868
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/PlanParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -276,22 +276,28 @@ class PlanParserSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158751828
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ColumnPruningSuite.scala
---
@@ -38,54 +38,69 @@ class ColumnPruningSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158751840
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -628,14 +628,14 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158751759
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ColumnPruningSuite.scala
---
@@ -38,54 +38,69 @@ class ColumnPruningSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158751546
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -444,12 +444,22 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20075#discussion_r158751340
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -560,10 +560,55 @@ cancelJobGroup <- function(sc, groupId) {
#'}
#' @note setJobDescription since 2.3.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20061
**[Test build #85418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85418/testReport)**
for PR 20061 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158751339
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -444,12 +444,22 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20075
**[Test build #85417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85417/testReport)**
for PR 20075 at commit
Github user zuotingbing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20025
Could you please merge this to Master? Thanks @felixcheung
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user Ngone51 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20056#discussion_r158751285
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/LiveListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -25,14 +25,13 @@ import scala.collection.JavaConverters._
import
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158751132
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -608,8 +608,8 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
**[Test build #85416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85416/testReport)**
for PR 19683 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158751010
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1605,7 +1607,8 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158750949
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20075
Yup, they should be handled too. Let me update.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16611
Hi @gatorsmile, WDYT about this PR? I was looking through my old PRs to
close or update. I wonder if you think it looks fine to go ahead to you.
---
Github user jvican commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19675
Is there any ticket that describes what needs to be done? Otherwise, could
you elaborate on it a that I have a clearer idea of what you need to have a
100% working 2.12-compatible Spark? Is the 1%
Github user gerashegalov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20055
agreed @srowen, this is a better fix although no other goal seemed
affected. Thanks for suggestion!
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85414/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
**[Test build #85414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85414/testReport)**
for PR 19683 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20056
**[Test build #85415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85415/testReport)**
for PR 20056 at commit
Github user MJFND commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14658
If "Remote Shuffle Blocks cannot be more than 2 GB" then setting up
spark.sql.shuffle.partitions=value, where value should be such that it has 2gb
per executor, like for 200GB of data, we can have
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070#discussion_r158744300
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/QuantileDiscretizerExample.scala
---
@@ -31,12 +31,11 @@ object QuantileDiscretizerExample {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070#discussion_r158744230
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/CorrelationExample.scala
---
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ object CorrelationExample {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070#discussion_r158744186
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/graphx/Analytics.scala ---
@@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ object Analytics extends Logging {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070#discussion_r158744360
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/CustomReceiver.scala
---
@@ -82,9 +82,9 @@ class CustomReceiver(host: String, port:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070#discussion_r158744210
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/ChiSquareTestExample.scala
---
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ object ChiSquareTestExample {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070#discussion_r158744255
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/DeveloperApiExample.scala
---
@@ -169,10 +169,10 @@ private class MyLogisticRegressionModel(
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20075
getLocalProperty Should not be returning invisible, I think.
Also can you check if we need to fail for key == NA?
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20073
Fair enough. Calling it, is good enough.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
**[Test build #85414 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85414/testReport)**
for PR 19683 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
**[Test build #85413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85413/testReport)**
for PR 19683 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85413/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
**[Test build #85413 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85413/testReport)**
for PR 19683 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20059
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85411/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20059
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20059
**[Test build #85411 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85411/testReport)**
for PR 20059 at commit
Github user uzadude commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158737578
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -846,12 +846,13 @@ class Analyzer(
//
Github user uzadude commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r158737560
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20084
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85412/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20084
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20084
**[Test build #85412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85412/testReport)**
for PR 20084 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20082
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85410/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20082
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20082
**[Test build #85410 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85410/testReport)**
for PR 20082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20085
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user bdrillard commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20085
cc: @marmbrus
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user bdrillard opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20085
[SPARK-22739][Catalyst][WIP] Additional Expression Support for Objects
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a work-in-progress adding additional `Expression`
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070
@srowen I rechecked all scala examples and this is commulative PR for the
same.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user bdrillard commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20010#discussion_r158724861
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -158,11 +213,8 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user bdrillard commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20010#discussion_r158728293
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -158,11 +169,6 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20084
**[Test build #85412 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85412/testReport)**
for PR 20084 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20055
Ping @gerashegalov
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
@gatorsmile created #20084 for adding tests. Thanks.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
GitHub user mgaido91 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20084
[SPARK-22904][SQL] Add tests for decimal operations and string casts
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Test coverage for arithmetic operations leading to:
1.
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070
You're correct - I missed other packages. I will re-confirm soon. Thanks.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070
In scala ? I don't think so. I am re-iterating and doing double check.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070
I think there are many more examples of this; a quick search suggests there
are about 40 example files that have some string concatenation.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20067
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20067
LGTM
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20067#discussion_r158725996
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2760,6 +2760,17 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
To be honest, I think more correct fix might be just to `_reserialize` but
just want to avoid any potential regression by avoiding class check and using
existing workaround used.
---
Github user chetkhatri closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20071
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20071
@srowen Thanks, Addressed and changes done.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070
@srowen also i did merge another similiar PR with graphx to here. so Just
FYI - we are good.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20056
Just fix and push a commit. It will retest it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20059
**[Test build #85411 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85411/testReport)**
for PR 20059 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
I just took a look. This looks actually going to bigger change because we
will need manually deal with the different de/serializers cases in Python side
as well, for example:
```
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20059#discussion_r158722622
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -528,51 +576,91 @@ specific to Spark on Kubernetes.
-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20083
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user pianista215 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20083
Supporting different host for Spark-shuffle
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding an option as spark.shuffle.service.host let you to specify different
ip for the
Github user advancedxy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20082#discussion_r158721239
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -95,7 +95,10 @@ object MimaExcludes {
// [SPARK-21087] CrossValidator, TrainValidationSplit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20082
**[Test build #85410 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85410/testReport)**
for PR 20082 at commit
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20070
@srowen Absolutely correct, this all in one shot. I did changes in all.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
@cloud-fan @srowen I am good with changes proposed. please do merge.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user advancedxy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20082
>Please explain in the JIRA/PR description about your use case that need to
access the stageAttemptId in the executor - we must provide a very good reason
to make such a change to a public
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20082
**[Test build #85409 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85409/testReport)**
for PR 20082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20082
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85409/
Test FAILed.
---
101 - 200 of 312 matches
Mail list logo