Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
Thank you, @tejasapatil . I see.
Although this is not applicable for ORC/Parquet hive tables, the PR looks
useful for me.
Could you put the condition and limitation in PR description?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
**[Test build #85946 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85946/testReport)**
for PR 20206 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
**[Test build #85945 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85945/testReport)**
for PR 20226 at commit
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20216
Dear Sir, However, the real spark big data environment, a very large number
of workers, every day running a very large number of applications, has
completed a very large number of
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
Jenkins retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
Jenkins retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user fjh100456 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20087
@gatorsmile
I'd change the precedence.
For Parquet, if `hive.exec.compress.output` is true, keep the old
precedence, otherwise, get compression from HiveOption.
For Orc, because
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20214
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85942/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20214
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20214
**[Test build #85942 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85942/testReport)**
for PR 20214 at commit
Github user merlintang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19885
@jerryshao and @steveloughran thanks for your comments and review.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20224
I totally agree to add unique ID. This is because all of the generated code
by whole-stage codegen has the same class name. It makes us hard to debug in a
production environment.
On the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20096
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85934/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20096
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20096
**[Test build #85934 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85934/testReport)**
for PR 20096 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20087
**[Test build #85944 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85944/testReport)**
for PR 20087 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85936/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
**[Test build #85936 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85936/testReport)**
for PR 20206 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
Jenkins test this please.
Previous test case failure is not related to the PR
```
org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite.(It is not a
test it is a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20227
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user xubo245 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20227
[SPARK-23035] Fix warning: TEMPORARY TABLE ... USING ... is deprecated and
use TempViewAlreadyExistsException when create temp view
Fix warning: TEMPORARY TABLE ... USING ... is deprecated
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85932/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872
**[Test build #85932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85932/testReport)**
for PR 19872 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85941/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20224
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85940/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
**[Test build #85941 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85941/testReport)**
for PR 20226 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20224
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20224
**[Test build #85940 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85940/testReport)**
for PR 20224 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20214
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85933/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20214
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20214
**[Test build #85933 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85933/testReport)**
for PR 20214 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19885
LGTM. @merlintang please fix the PR title, thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
@dongjoon-hyun : I tried it out over master and since the table scan goes
via codegen, it wont show the table name. Will update the PR description with
this finding. Lets move this discussion
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226#discussion_r160843749
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ case class HiveTableScanExec(
Github user mccheah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20192
Good to merge here?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
**[Test build #85943 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85943/testReport)**
for PR 20226 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226#discussion_r160843166
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ case class HiveTableScanExec(
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226#discussion_r160841853
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ case class HiveTableScanExec(
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20210
Thank you! @HyukjinKwon .
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
Then, specifically, what happens in this PR for Parquet/ORC table which is
converted to data source tables with `convertMetastoreParquet/Orc`? Now, both
parameters are `true` by default.
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20218#discussion_r160840909
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ class
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
@dongjoon-hyun : For Spark native tables, the table scan node is abstracted
out as a `WholeStageCodegen` node in the DAG. A codegen node might be doing
more things besides table scan so it is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
It looks useful, @tejasapatil . Given that this is one line addition, why
don't you handle the others?
> For this JIRA, I am scoping those for hive table scans only.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20223
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20223
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85929/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20223
**[Test build #85929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85929/testReport)**
for PR 20223 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20210
D'oh. I really did this with the script by `branch-2.3` but I don't know
what happened .. Will manually push it. Thanks.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19330
Aha, I think we can't touch the stable interface (`MapType`) until the next
release (v3.0). So, I think we need to hold this for a while. Or, we need to
look for other approaches to fix this.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20218#discussion_r160838671
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
**[Test build #85941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85941/testReport)**
for PR 20226 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20214
**[Test build #85942 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85942/testReport)**
for PR 20214 at commit
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
[SPARK-23034][Hive][UI] Display tablename for `HiveTableScan` node in UI
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For queries which scan multiple tables, it will be
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20224
One comment as to using `ThreadLocal[Integer]` for keeping track of the
IDs: I did have an alternative implementation of this PR that declares
`WholeStageCodegenExec` as:
```scala
case
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20217#discussion_r160834039
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/catalog.py ---
@@ -255,26 +255,67 @@ def registerFunction(self, name, f,
returnType=StringType()):
>>> _ =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20225
**[Test build #85939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85939/testReport)**
for PR 20225 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20224
**[Test build #85940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85940/testReport)**
for PR 20224 at commit
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20224
jenkins retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20216
Since this is a UI change can you post screenshots, and I'm not 100%
convinced on the necessity of this when we already have jump links at the top
of most pages.
---
GitHub user jose-torres opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20225
[SPARK-23033] Don't use task level retry for continuous processing
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Continuous processing tasks will fail on any attempt number
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20224
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85938/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20224
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user rednaxelafx opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20224
[SPARK-23032][SQL] Add a per-query codegenStageId to WholeStageCodegenExec
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**Proposal**
Add a per-query ID to the codegen
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
Could you update the PR title to include the component such as
`[SPARK-22975][SS] MetricsReporter should not throw exception when there was no
progress reported`?
---
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189#discussion_r160829638
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/MetricsReporter.scala
---
@@ -39,14 +35,18 @@ class MetricsReporter(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189#discussion_r160829808
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -424,6 +424,31 @@ class StreamingQuerySuite extends
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189#discussion_r160829544
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/MetricsReporter.scala
---
@@ -39,14 +35,18 @@ class MetricsReporter(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189#discussion_r160829605
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/MetricsReporter.scala
---
@@ -39,14 +35,18 @@ class MetricsReporter(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189#discussion_r160829571
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/MetricsReporter.scala
---
@@ -39,14 +35,18 @@ class MetricsReporter(
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20211#discussion_r160829658
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/RelationalGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -457,13 +458,26 @@ class RelationalGroupedDataset
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20223
**[Test build #85937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85937/testReport)**
for PR 20223 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
**[Test build #85936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85936/testReport)**
for PR 20206 at commit
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20163
Given the above discussion, do we have consensus on all of the following:
- Update the documentation for PySpark UDFs to warn about the behavior of
mismatched declared `returnType` vs actual
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20222
**[Test build #85935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85935/testReport)**
for PR 20222 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20096
**[Test build #85934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85934/testReport)**
for PR 20096 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20096
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20222
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20211#discussion_r160826435
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/group.py ---
@@ -233,6 +233,27 @@ def apply(self, udf):
| 2| 1.1094003924504583|
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20214
**[Test build #85933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85933/testReport)**
for PR 20214 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20214
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872
**[Test build #85932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85932/testReport)**
for PR 19872 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204#discussion_r160821469
--- Diff: python/test_coverage/sitecustomize.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85928/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872
**[Test build #85928 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85928/testReport)**
for PR 19872 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20174
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85930/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20174
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20174
**[Test build #85930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85930/testReport)**
for PR 20174 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20151#discussion_r160817581
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -34,17 +34,39 @@ private[spark] class
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20218#discussion_r160816667
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20174
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20174
LGTM, merging to master and branch-2.3. Thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20222
argh. i'll bump the job timeout now.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:19 PM, UCB AMPLab
wrote:
> Test FAILed.
> Refer to this link for build results
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20174
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85927/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20174
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20174
**[Test build #85927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85927/testReport)**
for PR 20174 at commit
101 - 200 of 417 matches
Mail list logo