Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20629
**[Test build #88307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88307/testReport)**
for PR 20629 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20659
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88299/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20659
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20659
**[Test build #88299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88299/testReport)**
for PR 20659 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20701
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/1561/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20701
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20701
**[Test build #88306 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88306/testReport)**
for PR 20701 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88303/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
**[Test build #88303 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88303/testReport)**
for PR 20812 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20817
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20817
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88301/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20817
**[Test build #88301 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88301/testReport)**
for PR 20817 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
@jerryshao
Thanks for comment;
Yes, this change is only for `sc.addJar` and the jars will be named with a
prefix when executor `updateDependencies`.
---
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20824#discussion_r175050086
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/FileCommitProtocol.scala ---
@@ -145,15 +146,23 @@ object FileCommitProtocol {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20846
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20846
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user liutang123 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20846
[SPARK-5498][SQL][FOLLOW] add schema to table partition
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When query a orc table witch some partition schemas are different from
Github user liutang123 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20846
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user liutang123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20846
[SPARK-5498][SQL][FOLLOW] add schema to table partition
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When query a orc table witch some partition schemas are different from
table
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20827
**[Test build #88305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88305/testReport)**
for PR 20827 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20827
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20827
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/1560/
Github user gczsjdy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20809
@viirya Yes, but this is only for people who will investigate on Spark
code, and it also requires manual efforts. Isn't it better if we get this
automatically?
---
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20800#discussion_r175039379
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -511,6 +511,14 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
*/
def isLocal:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20845
**[Test build #88304 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88304/testReport)**
for PR 20845 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20845
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user caneGuy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20845
[SPARK-23708][CORE] Correct comment for function addShutDownHook in
ShutdownHookManager
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Comment below is not right.
```
/**
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19573
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/1559/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19573
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20831#discussion_r175030682
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryRelation.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +69,15 @@ case class InMemoryRelation(
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20808#discussion_r175030155
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
*
Github user maropu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20808
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20795#discussion_r175029024
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1192,11 +1195,23 @@ class Analyzer(
* @see
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20795#discussion_r175026674
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1192,11 +1195,24 @@ class Analyzer(
* @see
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20795#discussion_r175026010
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1192,11 +1195,24 @@ class Analyzer(
* @see
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20795#discussion_r175025479
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1192,11 +1195,23 @@ class Analyzer(
* @see
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20795#discussion_r175023480
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1192,11 +1195,23 @@ class Analyzer(
* @see
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20795#discussion_r175022409
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1192,11 +1195,23 @@ class Analyzer(
* @see
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20799
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20799
Thanks for the review, let me merge to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20683
Don't really understand the issue itself. Which filesystem used this case?
Why is it not possible to use Hadoop-compatible filesystem like HDFS for
instance? This supports atomic rename. [See
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20844
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20844
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20844
@cloud-fan pls take a look, this is a small change. Thanks a lot.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
GitHub user ConeyLiu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20844
[SPARK-23707][SQL] Fresh 'initRange' name to avoid method name conflicts
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should call `ctx.freshName` to get the `initRange` to avoid name
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20827#discussion_r175019770
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -324,14 +324,14 @@ case class
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20579#discussion_r175019613
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -542,6 +542,11 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20809
For the case, shouldn't we just set `SPARK_SCALA_VERSION`?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20800#discussion_r175018339
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -511,6 +511,14 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
*/
def
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20808#discussion_r175017634
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
Does it only fix the jars added by `sc.addJar` or using non-yarn mode?
Because yarn uses distributed cache at start, so it has a different code path,
right?
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88300/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
**[Test build #88303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88303/testReport)**
for PR 20812 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
**[Test build #88300 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88300/testReport)**
for PR 20841 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/1558/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
**[Test build #88302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88302/testReport)**
for PR 20812 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/1557/
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20806
@WeichenXu123 The `seqOp`/`comOp` can be arbitrary and works on domain
objects, I'm not sure if built-in agg functions can satisfy all the use of it.
For example, it seems hard to express
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20579#discussion_r175013773
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -542,6 +542,11 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20794
@mgaido91 the PR has conflict with branch 2.3, so I don't cherry-pick it to
2.3. If you want to backport, please create another backport PR.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20817
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20817
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/1556/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20817
**[Test build #88301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88301/testReport)**
for PR 20817 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
**[Test build #88300 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88300/testReport)**
for PR 20841 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/1555/
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20817
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20794
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20659
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/1554/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20659
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20817
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20795
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20817
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88290/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20795
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88292/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88298/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
**[Test build #88293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88293/testReport)**
for PR 19222 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88293/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20817
**[Test build #88290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88290/testReport)**
for PR 20817 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20795
**[Test build #88292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88292/testReport)**
for PR 20795 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
**[Test build #88298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88298/testReport)**
for PR 20841 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20659
**[Test build #88299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88299/testReport)**
for PR 20659 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20794
Merging to master and brach 2.3. Thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812#discussion_r175010008
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -752,11 +752,10 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20822
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88296/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20822
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20822
**[Test build #88296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88296/testReport)**
for PR 20822 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
**[Test build #88298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88298/testReport)**
for PR 20841 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/1553/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20841
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20812
@jiangxb1987
Thanks a lot for review. I will refine soon !
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20788
**[Test build #88297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/88297/testReport)**
for PR 20788 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20788
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
301 - 400 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
