Github user schot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#issuecomment-160271652
@srowen @JoshRosen PR has been rebased to resolve the conflict on
MimaExcludes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user schot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#issuecomment-159591402
Because I merged the fix in the previous commit Jenkins retest does not
happen automatically?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user schot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#issuecomment-158928365
@srowen Yes, I added a Mima exclude.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user schot commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#discussion_r45254169
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaRDDLike.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ trait JavaRDDLike[T, This <: JavaRDDLike[T, This]]
exte
Github user schot commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#discussion_r45257971
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaRDDLike.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ trait JavaRDDLike[T, This <: JavaRDDLike[T, This]]
exte
Github user schot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#issuecomment-157352481
Although it would be nice to fix the inconsistencies in the usage of
partitions.length vs partitions.size, I agree that its better to stick to just
adding
GitHub user schot opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767
[SPARK-3580] Add Consistent Method To Get Number of RDD Partitions Across
Different Languages
I have tried to address all the comments in pull request
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447
Github user schot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9767#issuecomment-157503489
If I understand the discussion in SPARK-3266 correctly the method should
only be added to the JavaRRDLike trait and not the abstract class.
I have updated the PR
