SaurabhChawla100 commented on pull request #29045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29045#issuecomment-659392227
@cloud-fan / @dongjoon-hyun - The test build is failing with following
error
```
Test build #125949 has finished for PR 29045 at commit c0f6209.
This
SaurabhChawla100 commented on pull request #29045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29045#issuecomment-658561486
Retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
SaurabhChawla100 commented on pull request #29045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29045#issuecomment-657978027
> Can you be more specific about the problem? Are you saying that the actual
file schema doesn't match the table schema specified by the user?
So in case of orc
SaurabhChawla100 commented on pull request #29045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29045#issuecomment-657455284
> @dongjoon-hyun / @maropu - Its seems like some issue happened after I
rebase this current branch with the master branch.
>
> Its now showing number of files
SaurabhChawla100 commented on pull request #29045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29045#issuecomment-657451506
@dongjoon-hyun / @maropu - Its seems like some issue happened after I
rebase this current branch with the master branch.
Its now showing number of files change
SaurabhChawla100 commented on pull request #29045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29045#issuecomment-657186265
> Thank you for updating, but could you update the PR description with the
reproducible example? If someone is following the example, it will not fail
because they
SaurabhChawla100 commented on pull request #29045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29045#issuecomment-657185061
> @SaurabhChawla100 . Thanks for updating. Apache Spark has two ORC
implementations `native` and `hive`. Could you add the following test coverage
more?
>
> 1.
SaurabhChawla100 commented on pull request #29045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29045#issuecomment-655888981
> Thank you for your contribution, @SaurabhChawla100 .
> In order to prevent the future regression, could you make a UT with your
example, please?
Sure I will
