[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-07 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-655182927 **[Test build #125233 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125233/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-07 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654952432 **[Test build #125233 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125233/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-07 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654907314 **[Test build #125194 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125194/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-07 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654668685 **[Test build #125194 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125194/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-07 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654644087 **[Test build #125166 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125166/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654569914 **[Test build #125166 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125166/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654565606 **[Test build #125162 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125162/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654559977 **[Test build #125162 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125162/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654553242 **[Test build #125146 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125146/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654512253 **[Test build #125146 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125146/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654285031 **[Test build #125094 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125094/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654278495 **[Test build #125040 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125040/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654059270 **[Test build #125040 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125040/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654054352 **[Test build #125035 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125035/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654047169 **[Test build #125035 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125035/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-06 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654041829 **[Test build #124991 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/124991/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-05 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653966444 **[Test build #124991 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/124991/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-05 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653965383 **[Test build #124928 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/124928/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

2020-07-05 Thread GitBox
SparkQA commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653931843 **[Test build #124928 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/124928/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit