[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on pull request #29032: [SPARK-32217] Plumb whether a worker would also be decommissioned along with executor

cloud-fan commented on pull request #29032: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-662829893 I agree `host` is better as it's general to any deployment model. I think we should only use `worker` when it refers to the standalone worker. Maybe we can start following

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on pull request #29032: [SPARK-32217] Plumb whether a worker would also be decommissioned along with executor

cloud-fan commented on pull request #29032: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-662805220 I have a general question (not related to this PR): We have deprecated the usage of "multi-workers on one host", so host and worker should be the same thing. However, in the

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on pull request #29032: [SPARK-32217] Plumb whether a worker would also be decommissioned along with executor

cloud-fan commented on pull request #29032: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-659846826 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on pull request #29032: [SPARK-32217] Plumb whether a worker would also be decommissioned along with executor

cloud-fan commented on pull request #29032: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-659314357 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on pull request #29032: [SPARK-32217] Plumb whether a worker would also be decommissioned along with executor

cloud-fan commented on pull request #29032: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-658911046 ok to test This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on