dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #26804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26804#issuecomment-630997965
@h-vetinari . This is wrong, isn't it? Did someone (except you) say it's low
priority here? We want that, but currently it looks infeasible technically. Do
you think that
dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #26804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26804#issuecomment-630904663
@h-vetinari . Parquet is a de-facto standard in Apache Spark and is related
to all the other module. That's the reason why Parquet should not break
anything in all the
dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #26804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26804#issuecomment-630471244
@iemejia 's Avro PR (#27609) didn't pass Apache Spark UTs. And, according to
his report, this Parquet PR seems to be blocked by Avro dependency upgrade. If
we have a
